No, Then it's low pressure, not a vacuum.
Again. We are beings that live in one atmosphere, and you are ignoring the stored energy/ potential context.
I'm not ignoring anything of the sort. You simply do not understand it from my side because you're too far behind your shield.
Pressurized, greater than atmospheric pressure.
No, not at all.
Pressurised in pressure in all instances, no matter how low or high.
His more stored energy than air at atmosphere.
In an area, yes.
A pressurized tank will spray out if containment is lost.
If it's higher pressure internally than what's in that area externally, yes.
It will loss potential energy, and molecules to atmosphere.
It will decompress and compress external atm0osphere until it decompresses back to stacked layering.
Vacuum. Pressure and stored energy below atmospheric pressure.
Nope. No vacuum can exist.
Lower pressure than external atmospheric pressure, yes.
If a tank at vacuum loss containment, it will draw in atmosphere.
No, it won't.
The atmosphere will push into the container and compress the lower compressed molecules within that container.
The container draws nothing in.
Unless you can explain what drawing means in this instance.
It will try to equalize with atmosphere by gaining more molecules, by gaining potential energy from atmosphere.
The atmosphere will push in more compressed molecules to decompress and then recompress within the container.
The word vacuum perfectly gives clear communication of pressure and potential energy in regards of atmosphere for the processes I work with.
I know what and why it's used but I'm telling you it doesn't exist and it's simply lower pressure against higher pressure.
You could argue that evacuation of matter will never end up leaving free space, meaning a vacuum cannot and never will exist.
Again..
The word vacuum perfectly gives clear communication of pressure and potential energy in regards to atmosphere for the processes I work with.
No.
Lower pressure does not offer potential energy. It offers nothing. Only higher pressure against lower pressure offers the potential energy.
No free space?
That is what makes gases highly compressible.
Correct, no free space can make gases more compressible, not free space.
Free space. That is why evacuating a chamber of air molecules below the amount of molecules found at atmosphere will make a feather fall faster.
Evacuating a chamber by natural decompression will obviously make anything fall faster because the resistance to that fall and dense mass are reduced.
I've never denied that so why are you offering it?
As more molecules are evacuated, the faster the feather will fall.
As above, the more that molecules can naturally decompress the less resistance to a dense mass there will be so naturally the fall will be faster.
Enough vacuum created by evacuating enough air molecules, before perfect vacuum, air resistance becomes negligible so a feather, coin, and bowling ball will fall at the same rate.
No it doesn't. You see here you go again with this vacuum, as if it's offering no pressure and free space.
It can't happen and is a fallacy.
If we go down to the nitty gritty of objects falling in low pressure they will only appear to fall at the same rate but the reality is, they don't, unless the dense mass of the objects and the make-up of the objects are identical.
The only issue we have here is in allowing the fall to happen over a large elevation but you and I both know the outcome will not be both objects hitting the ground at the same time from a massive height.
And this is why low heights are used to confuse people and have them believing in a fictional force called gravity.
Now.
There has to be free space between molecules.
No, there does not. It cannot happen and never will happen.
Everything is attached. All molecules are attached with absolutely no free space.
It explains how the air molecules get out of the way for objects to fall.
No.
Take a look at the water. Are you saying water is free space?
Does an object sink in it?
Why?
If there is no free space in it then how does it happen?
Put your thinking cap on.
More densely layered molecules will push out of the way less densely layered molecules by expansion to compression to decompression.
In den pressure where molecules ensure there is no free space by expanding to consume all free space, there is no room for a feather to fall.
As above.
That literally means in den pressure the mass / matter of air molecules have to expand so their mass takes up all free space.
There is never free space and the expansion is decompression which pushes molecules out of the way if the molecules decompressing are more layered.
I bet you're still massively confused and clearly you have no clue what you're arguing against.
That literally means the mass of the feather and the mass of air molecules have to occupy the same space at the same instance for the feather to fall through the expanded mass of air molecules in a vacuum in DPD enduring all space is occupied by mater. [/b]
There is never a vacuum in denpressure so you will have to find another way to explain what it is you're trying to explain.