Looking at your paper's intro, you make a lot of incorrect assertions. The human mouth can only make a finite number of sounds, and so only a finite number of arrangements can exist. Additionally, the English language doesn't have infinite words. It COULD have many more than it does, but it's definitely not infinite. An infinite number of stars would absolutely wash out the sky; why wouldn't it? It's as if you have a sphere of stars around the earth, and more layers of stars behind it. The paper is full of stuff like this.
...an infinite number of finite visible numbers have been humanly created, and that each one of these humanly created visible finite numbers could contain an infinite number of visible finite fractions and decimals.
Yeah. That's literally the first definition of Infinity in the Britannica definition you cite. You can place an infinite number of numbers on a number line. Decimals and fractions are numbers, and thus included in that definition.
But then I hit parts like this, and I just can't figure out what you mean.
...infinite number of visible lawyers have so far been able to publish an infinite number of visible Federal, state, and local law books.
What does this even mean? There is a finite number of books printed. There is a finite number of lawyers registered or that have been registered. This quote doesn't make any sense.
...there are no visible fixed points anywhere in a visible infinity.
This is just false. Get a graphing calculator program, and zoom out. Move left, move right. You'll never hit the edge. And yet, each point in that infinite grid is defined and fixed. (180028, 171) will always be at that same location.
...according to the physicists, matter and empty space emerged simultaneously from out of the big bang explosion (Linde et al., 1994) that supposedly occurred 13.75 light years ago from today, give or take a billion or so light years either way: why could the first man and woman not have emerged simultaneously?
Because the big bang was a massive explosion of protons and neutrons and molecules and atoms. They wouldn't have emerged simultaneously because why would they? Why would the mess of protons and neutrons magically align to bring a human into existence? Even if they did, they'd immediately choke and die, or they'd instantly vaporize due to the pressure and heat.
But they completely overlooked the fact that there was no empty space anywhere in the infinite visible Universe.
There is absolutely empty space in the universe. When you attach a vacuum pump to a closed cylinder and turn it on, what happens inside? The space empties. It is empty. In outer space, the space is more empty than on Earth. even if it's not truly empty, there's nothing between the molecules. Well, there IS something between them. Dark matter. So in a way you're right, but right after this you say dark matter doesn't exist. So what, then, is between the atoms and molecules?
I just skipped over the section about the Earth's infinite rotations which are infinitely unique due the infinite time they take. I cannot parse that section for the life of me. Infinity does not mean uncertainty, which I THINK is what you use it to mean. If that's the case, then I guess everything here is technically correct, but doesn't exactly equate to a flat earth. The bit about circular eyeballs is an interesting one, because it means that you're basing all of this off of... what? Speculation? You don't really have any proof for your claims other than what is obvious (to you, anyways.)
I think my thoughts on this paper can best be summed up by reading this line:
If the earth were totally flat, it would be invisible and incapable of sustaining any visible form of life.
Like, what does this mean? A perfectly flat object wouldn't be invisible, it would be a mirror. And why does being flat make something incapable of supporting life? Everything before this is a paragraph about how visible things are visible?
Some of this is just accurate. The bit about how there's no way to precisely measure time is true; time is always approximate.
The conclusion just states "Everything is visible and unique. The universe is infinite, and also everyone is in their own." Which again, kind of, but not really, makes sense. What's the point here? What is your actual claim here?