It is not because I'm arrogant.
It most certainly is.
You are incredibly arrogant, wanting to think this world was made for you, rather than you being insignificant in the grand scheme of things.
You think your brief search for something will give you more knowledge than someone who has spent a quite significant time working in that field, with you then boldly proclaiming things to be wrong or false or lies and so on, based upon nothing more than your pathetic cursory glance.
You do not know what you can do.
Instead you massively overstate your ability to pretend you can do things you can't.
All so you can pretend your rejection and replacing it with delusional BS is justified.
But it isn't.
The moon phases demonstrate this.
You start of boldly acting like you can just take the RE explanation and stick it into your delusional flat garbage and it will magically just work.
Then after that repeatedly fails, you flee from that and replace it with more pathetic BS, never actually providing an explanation for how it works in your fantasy.
You have it explained why your claims are delusional BS, you are unable to find a single fault with them, so you flee from them, only to come back a short while later and make the same refuted BS claims.
So don't bother coming here and claiming you aren't arrogant.
Maybe because it's an image based on faulty assumptions?
You mean the faulty assumption that Earth is flat?
Where that makes it never work?
As opposed to a model which has Earth round, which matches reality and makes the explanation works.
If as I said repeatedly, the sun and moon are images projected through a dome, then it makes perfect sense that we'd all see the same side of it.
And it would then result in so many other issues it isn't funny.
Projecting it onto a dome would result in the image being distorted depending on what angle you view it from.
The only way to solve the problem is to have the moon very far away, such that it is basically the same direction for everyone.
It also raises the question of just what magic is doing this projection.
And a projection wouldn't be able to eclipse the sun, or block other objects from view.
You can't see stars behind the moon.
So you need a magical dark projection which stops the light.
Or you need to go even more insane and say the entire sky is a projection, making that projection far more complex.
If however, the moon is a three-dimensional object, as you think, then you tell me, why do we only ever see one side of it.
You have already been told why.
The moon is always over 350 000 km away.
Standing on the other side of Earth is not going to significantly alter your view.
Again, this image shows the full extent:
That tiny difference at the side, which you can't even clearly see in this image, shows the difference expected for a RE with a moon 350 000 km away.
So no, there is no issue here for the RE model.
Stop repeating the same refuted BS.
If you want to claim such BS, then provide the math to support it.
Otherwise, don't make bold claims that you should be able to see the other side from China.
Once more, it doesn't if the moon is flat or round, either way it needs to be incredible far away.
If it was close and flat, you would be viewing it from different angles, so it would appear squashed in one direction, with the direction varying depending on where you were viewing it from. This also means that the distortion would change throughout the night.
If it was close and 3D, then your argument would apply where you should see different sides of it.
Neither of these happen. This means it is very far away. So far, that moving around Earth doesn't make any significant change in the angle you are viewing it from.
Your argument is NOT against the moon being 3D. It is against the moon being close.
And because the moon's orbit is not a perfect circle, we see more than 1 half of the moon as it appears to wobble around.
And as it does that, we see parts of it change just like you would expect a spherical moon.
Not to mention so far the only viable explanation for the phases of the moon relies upon it being a sphere.
So the evidence demonstrates that the moon is spherical.
And that is without appealing to the photos of the far side.
You hire someone to take you, and they use GPS, meaning they don't have to know either.
No, they don't need to know, instead they use a tool which relies upon Earth being roughly spherical.
We don't have an agreed upon distance to the South Pole from the North Pole.
Yes we do. You not liking that wont change it.
12,436.12 mi
https://www.distance.to/North-Pole
Wait, same website and they are off by more than half a mile?
Your second link doesn't include a second location, making it worthless.
You weren't going between the north pole and south pole.
Why would drilling a hole through the Earth get you a difference of nearly 5000 miles?
Even a child can work that out.
In one case you are travelling along a straight line directly between 2 points.
In the other, you are going along the surface of Earth.
Planes don't fly through the ground.
For someone who claims to know, you sure do like acting like a moron that knows nothing.
Distance between North and South Pole is 13832.88 km. This distance is equal to 8595.35 miles, and 7464.21 nautical miles
https://www.distancefromto.net/between/North/South+Pole
Same website, totally different amount
Because you are using a completely different location.
Notice how you changed it from North Pole to North?
So instead of using the north pole, you use the North Governorate in Lebanon.
Your dishonesty knows no bounds. You are willing to outright lie to everyone, using whatever dishonest delusional BS you can to pretend there is a problem with the RE, all while entirely failing to explain something basic as the moon's phases for your delusional disc of garbage.
12,430 miles
https://www.travelmath.com/distance/from/South+Pole/to/North+Pole
Off by 6 miles from the typical measure.
As if they use a rounded number to calculate the distance. And the calculation will vary depending on exactly what you are using.
Are they treating Earth as a perfect sphere for simple math, or are they treating it as an oblate spheroid, or a geoid?
These will produce different answers.
They are lying.
No, you are.
Using whatever dishonest BS you can.
Even without seeing the anamalous 8595.35 mile measurement
No, lets keep in that blatant lie of yours, where you switched what location you were using to pretend there is an anomaly.
It shows just what level of dishonesty you are willing to use to pretend there is problem with the RE.
we get these kinds of measurements when people are basing things on calculation
So you are surprised that going to a website which calculates distances is performing a calculation.
More dishonest BS from you.
Now again, when will you stop with all this pathetic dishonest BS and start trying to explain how the phases of the moon work in your delusional fantasy?