Still no answer as to how this supposed space satellite got into the supposed high orbit and also to get to the speed of rotation of the supposed spinning globe.

With a rocket.

What is so hard about that?

It is the stuff of absolute fantasy or shall I say the stuff of fantasy stories sold to us as factual.

Why? Because it doesn't fit your delusional BS?

Batteries and electrical components within these supposed satellites would obviously have no cooling fan and no heatsinks to do anything because they simply cannot play any part in the cooling of electronic heat build-up, not to mention the dangerous recharging of batteries.

And more garbage.

Satellites can radiate heat away.

So many questions that do not have answers.

So perhaps you should stop deflecting and instead try answer the questions?

My daughter changed from BT to sky. She does not have a dish. Sky now uses the original aerial on her roof. From where? Space?

Or a tower?

We have been over this, you are wrong, they are using the internet.

Offering a dish to simply catch the signal being encrypted gets you your TV shows based on setting the direction, just like setting an aerial

Only the antenna lays horizontal, while the dish points up into the sky, at a satellite, and has a parabolic reflector to focus the signal.

And why the need for 23,000 miles in orbit?

Because of something you hate, GRAVITY!

An honest sane person who actually cared would think about why? Why would it need to be that altitude? What would happen if it is lower? What would happen if it was higher?

This would lead them to 2 big questions, how does gravity vary with altitude, and how does the acceleration required to maintain an orbit vary with altitude and orbital period?

They would recognise that if you had a stable orbit and you lowered it, the acceleration due to gravity would increase but the acceleration required to maintain that orbital period would decrease. That means if the orbit lowers, the angular velocity will need to increase, meaning it will no longer be synchronised with Earth. And they would recognise that going higher means the opposite occurs, gravity is weaker and the acceleration needed is larger, so the angular velocity is lower, and it still is not longer synchronised.

This is why things like the ISS in LEO orbit every 90 minutes or so, while the moon takes almost an entire month.

With that they would recognise that there is going to be a point where it is balanced such that the orbital period matches Earth, and they just need to do the math (another thing you hate) to find out what altitude that is.

The acceleration due to gravity is given by a=GM/r^2; where a is the acceleration, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the primary body, and r is the radius of the orbit (not altitude).

The acceleration required to maintain a circular orbit is given by a=w^2*r=w*v=v^2/r; where w is the angular velocity; v is the linear velocity, and a and r are as above.

This can also be rewritten by noting w=2*pi/T, where T is the period.

This gives a=(2*pi/T)^2*r

If we are going to let gravity do the work, we simply equate the 2:

(2*pi/T)^2*r = GM/r^2

which gives:

r^3=GM*(T/2pi)^2

r=(GM*(T/2pi)^2)^1/3

Putting in G=6.6743e-11 N m^2/kg^2; M=5.972168e24 kg; and T=86164 s (the length of a sidereal day); we end up with r=42164 km. Subtracting Earth's equatorial radius of 6378.1 km we end up with 35786 km. Converting to archaic units we get 22236 archaic units.

But of course, you are an honest person that actually cares. You just want to pretend people are making up numbers to dismiss it all as fantasy to try and replace reality with your delusional BS.