Come back when you calm down.
You sure do love your pathetic dismissal.
I get it, you can't refute me, and know that, and are upset at just how often you have been refuted; so you make up pathetic excuses to avoid addressing simple issues and answering simple questions.
Perhaps you should leave, and come back if you grow up and are willing to honestly engage?
But then again there's no proof your sun is a near 1 million mile diameter, 93 million mile distant nuclear fusion reactor but you swallow it because the schooling teaches that and that's all you know of the story as your reality. Proving it is impossible and you're well aware of that.
There is plenty.
You not liking it doesn't magically make all that evidence disappear.
You reject it, because it doesn't fit your delusional fantasy.
The projector is in the centre. Nobody is operating it. It's a natural energy fed by Earth itself. A sealed unit of finite energy of a cell until the cell dies.
Sure, no one is operating it, but it magically produces exactly what is expected for a RE.
I don't believe in any god.
The problem is that your world is quite clearly not natural.
You have no natural explanation for what would cause a magical snow globe Earth to form, with a magical projector in the centre.
Can you not step back and see your spinning globe as the monstrosity is really is?
What monstrosity?
I can step back, and examine and see how well it matches reality.
I can step back and see how it is explained with a few simple laws.
I can step back and see how the arguments against it so often rely upon blatant misrepresentation.
I will never turn my back on my ideas unless I find better ideas.
You have already demonstrated that is not the case.
You discard ideas you don't like and cling to others which are vastly inferior.
The reason you see that is because the moon is the direct reflection of the sun on the dome. It's why you see moon down sun up or vice versa, from your vantage point.
The problem is that only matches reality for a narrow window of time.
The phase of the moon, and its associated separation from the sun varies over time.
If the moon was merely a reflection of the sun's projection on the dome we would expect it to match the sun.
Yet we can observe the sun with a solar filter in fairly good detail, even seeing things like sunspots. Things which don't occur on the moon.
But more importantly, we should expect it to always be related the same way, we should always have a full moon, with the moon being 180 degrees from the sun.
Instead, we observe the phase and angular separation vary. We do have full moons, but only for a small period of the month. At other times, the moon is off at a different angle, and we can see the sun and moon in the sky at the same time, with the moon not a fully illuminated circle.
We also observe a new moon when the sun and moon are quite close.
But the biggest issue are the eclipses.
If the moon is just a reflection of the sun, what causes a lunar eclipse?
More significantly what causes the solar eclipse, which clearly appears to be the moon going in front of the sun.
Even if we dismiss all the evidence from multiple space agencies as fake, the evidence still shows your idea doesn't work.