All places of higher learning would be well served by having equal space in their libraries dedicated to both sides of the Earth shape conundrum.
Why?
There is so much more supporting a RE, and there are plenty of tangentially related issues, like understanding of the universe, which would make the RE naturally take up vastly more space.
Remember that mental powerhouses such as Rowbotham and Einstein both realized that RET had limitations when compared with FET.
No, the FE high prophet Row Boat claimed it, and were unable to substantiate those claims.
They even claimed ridiculous things like if you throw something up in the air at an angle, it will fly in a straight line until it reaches the peak, after which it will fall directly down.
As for Einstein, where?
Let's hope teachers and professors will allow their students to research and decide on their own, truths about this Earth.
There aren't personal truths about the shape of Earth. Either the students discover the truth, or the get fiction.
But lets hope teachers actually explain and try to have students conduct experiments to understand.
Maybe if Row Boat got such an education he wouldn't have claimed Earth is flat.
The popular consensus amongst 'scientists" is that men can give birth.
I would say it is a popular consensus among crazy libtards, and plenty of scientists are smart enough to not say anything against it less they be crucified in the court of public opinion.
You know men can get pregnant and give birth?
No, they can't.
Intersex individuals which could hypothetically be described as both male and female have that potential. But if they are just male, they can't, as that isn't what a male is.
If you are referring to the BS idea of trans people, then you may as well say:
"You know skjreghlsfbgsrj can get pregnant and give birth?"
As it makes just as much sense, complete with using what they want to be an entirely meaningless word, which means it can be replaced by another meaningless word.