No you are not. You just want me to accept your illusions about my faith.
Quite the opposite.
You want me to accept the BS of your faith, rather than calling out the problems with it.
Again, he does not chose anything. People live with the consequences of their choices.
I choose not to be tormented. There is nothing I have done which has the natural consequence of torment.
So if your god torments me, it is its choice, not mine.
That makes it evil.
If it set up a system, where torment would be the consequence for my actions, then that its choice not mine.
Either way, it is evil.
Usually you would think as the majority think
But not because the majority think it.
I accept what the evidence supports.
The widely abundant evidence supports the fact that Earth is roughly spherical.
Because of this the majority of people will believe it.
But if the majority of people believe in some other crap, but have no evidence to support it, I wont believe.
If you're going to talk about God in my faith, you have to accept it as I believe.
No, I don't need to believe everything you say about it.
Instead, I can show the contradictions and use books you claim to describe it to show just how evil it is.
Just like if I want to talk to someone about Voldemort, I don't need to accept that Voldemort is good because they say it is.
Ultimately, it's God's own decision
Which means it is God's choice to torment me or not. It has nothing to do with justice.
Divine knowledge that says God is good
While portraying it as clearly evil, demonstrating it is evil.
This is a very wrong example.
No, it isn't.
It shows what dangerous beliefs in a childish evil tyrant can do.
You are acting like because I don't believe, I shouldn't care what ISIS believes, even if those beliefs would have them try to kill innocent people.
This is why I speak out against abhorrent beliefs when people are promoting them.
I'm putting the facts right in your eyes
Appealing to your own ignorance is not putting facts in front of me.
If you need to start with a question of "where..." that isn't putting facts in front of me.
Try actual facts, rather than an appeal to your ignorance.
You couldn't explain which animal turned into a human?
Because those animals are dead.
But we share many similarities with primates, as we are a primate.
Did an entire race suddenly become human?
No, it was a gradual change over many generations, with no clear delineation of where human starts and the other species ends.
It is like if you had a wall which was painted with varying shades from red to blue, it is not clear where blue begins and whatever colour proceeded it ends.
I already said you would say this.
What you claimed is that I would say your god is a liar, quite different.
Again, it is quite simple, either your god is incapable of lying, so it is quite limited with something it cannot do; or it is capable of lying, so it could be lying to you and something doesn't mean it can't be god.
It also means your god could have been lying when it says it doesn't lie.
For example, I did not find this idea logical.
Because you want to pretend your god must be good and love you.
But you can't demonstrate anything wrong with my claim.
Instead all you can do is repeatedly assert that your god wont lie, without being able to justify that claim.
If you're talking about my faith, you have to stay in context.
And I am. Your faith in context portrays your god as an evil tyrant.
You believing it is good does not negate that context.
You don't read what I write, you don't understand what you read.
No, I do read and understand.
I just point out the problems with your excuses.
If an all powerful, good god existed, we would not have so much suffering in this world.
So either your god is not good, or it is not all powerful.
Your idea of Satan ruling this world as an explanation for the suffering only works if you either your god cannot stop Satan meaning it isn't all powerful, and apparently Satan is more powerful; or if your god is happy with Satan causing all this suffering, meaning it isn't good; the only other way out is to say that your god doesn't know.
So either your god is not good, or it is not all powerful, or it doesn't care.
You obviously don't understand math.
I do understand math. Your math isn't helping you. It does nothing to demonstrate evil is needed for good.
This applies not only to good and bad, but to any concept that is opposite to each other
So you admit your prior claim was wrong, and that good and bad are opposites, with neutral being neutral, not merely a middle ground between 2 extremes, with one being absence and one being presence?
But even then, the mere existence of one, does not require the existence of the opposite. Instead it depends on what it is.
This is not math, this is philosophy.
Math wont help you.
There is no mention here that it is necessary to do evil for fun and goals.
I said you said it was necessary to exist, not for you to actively engage in it.
But it is still you need evil to have fun.