No, it means. If you're going to talk about fiction, you have to talk about fiction.
And I am.
I am using the actions that this being commits in this work of fiction to judge it by.
In this fiction, God is a childish evil tyrant.
If you wish to object to that, you need to deal with what this god does in this work of fiction, not just say this work of fiction claims this god is good.
Do Slytherins claiming Voldemort is good make him good in Harry Potter? No.
In that case she would be a liar
Why?
Because it chose to torment people? That means it is evil.
Not tormenting people for eternity even though they hurt your feelings doesn't make you a liar.
There is no compulsion in belief, belief is a choice.
As much as plenty of people say that, it really isn't.
You can't simply choose to believe something.
(Assuming free will isn't an illusion) You can choose to pretend to believe, but you can't choose to believe.
This is your belief, how your God is.
No, not my god. Your god.
I have no god.
Continually calling it my god wont magically make it so.
But if your God is wrong and he is a just God, it is certain that what you say will come at a cost.
If a god exists and is just it would recognise why people would not believe in a good, just god. As such it would not punish them for it.
It would recognise why people describe the Abrahamic god as an evil tyrant.
If it was going to punish anyone based upon religion, it would punish people like you for trying to promote the worship of a childish evil tyrant.
So no, a just god would not punish me for what I have said. Only an evil god would, which would just prove that it is evil.
I'm saying that what you think is your God is actually Devil.
So you are saying nothing is the devil, as I have no god.
I'm trying to fix your problem.
If you truly were, you would stop spouting such nonsense. You would stop falsely claiming that I believe your god exists, you would stop claiming it is my god, as I have no god. Instead, you would start focusing on the alleged actions of this childish evil tyrant and trying to explain why those abhorrent acts don't make it evil.
So you aren't trying to fix my problem. You are trying to fix your own problem, the problem that your god is an evil tyrant and I recognise that.
It is the opposite of what you think. Divine knowledge says that the devil is the evil tyrant.
What divine knowledge? The divine knowledge that depicts your god as an evil tyrant and which we have absolutely no reason to trust?
Otherwise, you would be completely neutral on the matter.
Completely neutral like not picking a god at all, instead of picking a particular god?
Do you believe in God? No, isn't it? Then who cares what others believe?
How about anyone who cares about actions of groups like ISIS?
What people believe can affect their actions and cause them to commit atrocities.
If everyone with those beliefs just shut up and kept it to themselves, then people wouldn't need to speak out against it.
The evidence against evolution is stronger than in favor.
Yet you cannot provide a single piece of evidence and instead just appeal to ignorance.
Where are the IQ animals
There are plenty of animals with varying levels of intelligence. Some people even suggest some are smarter than humans.
Examples include dogs, cats, birds, whales and primates.
evolution is nonsense.
If you want to claim evolution is nonsense, prove it.
God has always been
So you are saying a being with incredible complexity can exist without a creator. So why should we need one?
It's the God you believe, not ours.
So you believe your god is incapable of lying, that it is limited?
Otherwise, it could be lying.
The idea that a liar could be God would not make sense to anyone who believes in God.
Technically it is more to people who worship and obey this god.
Because if this god is lying, why are you worshipping and obeying it?
But there is nothing nonsensical about a god lying.
If we look at other religions, like the Norse, they had Loki, whom I pretty sure lied.
So it certainly seems like people can believe in a god that lies.
In our opinion, you are describing the devil
Simply because you refuse to accept your god is evil. But no, I am describing your god.
But one of those your fictional things has blinded you to see reality.
No, it hasn't.
You are yet to demonstrate how what I am saying is false.
Instead you just repeatedly assert I am wrong.
Weather and natural disasters are all natural, none of them unusual.
And chaotic.
So there is chaos.
So you have failed to prove your god can't lie.
Not. That's why I said that it is necessary for believers because they are not prevented from seeing the truth by the devil unlike unbelievers.
i.e. they must be incredibly biased, with your position being incredibly biased.
You cannot fathom the idea that someone could be unbiased, and think your religion is false and think that the Abrahamic god is evil.
It depends on what you mean by good and bad. There is no absolute evil, like white and black, good and evil are relative.
So your god is not good.
But as I said before, I entirely disagree.
Good and evil are not relative in the sense that you can make a bad action good by having a much worse action.
God is good because he is just.
Your god is an evil tyrant, that is not just at all. That means it isn't good.
That's why you're not God.
So I'm not God, because God is evil and I'm not. Got it.
1) The person who rules the world is not God, but the "current God".
So is your god too powerless to stop it, or does it just not care?
2) For good to exist, evil must also exist.
No, it doesn't.
Good can exist without evil.
I don't need to be able to murder someone to be able to help them.
This funny way of thinking can only be said by someone with an automatic algorithm.
No, it can be said by anyone who rationally approaches the subject, and reads what you have said.
According to you, good is the absence of evil.
And according to you, your god has created evil, that means your god has committed an evil act, and thus your god is evil.
I thought you were good at math. Here 0 is God, +1 is me, -1 is you.
I am, are you?
Because you don't seem to be, as you are yet again contradicting yourself.
Once more in your world, good and evil are relative, where good is merely the absence of evil.
So to make it simple, I am 0, without evil, making me good; while you are 1, the most evil, making you evil.
Your god is 0.5. That means it has half the evil that you do, also making it evil.
If you want it to be entirely relative, then your god is good compared to you, but evil compared to me.
we think that he is a good God because it is a good thing that he created us.
No, WE don't. You might think that, but I certainly don't.
I don't think it created me at all.
If I did think this god created everyone, then I think it is evil, due to all the evil people it created, and so many people that would seem to have been created just to suffer.
You don't understand. "current God" here means the one who dominates it.
So you are saying your god is dominated by the devil?
I didn't say anything like that. I don't understand where you came up with this as your life is completely wrong.
No. If it wasn't for you and bad guys like you, the world wouldn't need to exist. Only between me and people like me there wouldn't be any claims, there wouldn't be any goals, there wouldn't be any striving for things. In a world that consisted of only white color, everyone would get bored and leave.
Here you are claiming that good and evil must exist, and that if we only had goodness, that everyone would get bored and leave.