They can’t all be right.
But that doesn't mean they are all wrong.
Could you explain how you know that they are all wrong.
I simply said none of them are right as current evidence suggests that nothing concrete is know about post life. If that’s the case then none can be correct.
Again, no it isn't. That isn't how it works.
If you don't know, then you don't know if they are right or wrong.
Again, consider the dice example.
Nothing concrete is known about which face is up.
We have 6 people all saying 6 different things.
According to your claim there, that means that they must all be wrong.
So if all 6 are wrong, what face is up?
If the mechanism that creates conciseness, that’s assuming there is one, from inanimate matter is not known or understood how can someone or organisation proclaim they know what happens when the inanimate matter that housed this conciseness no longer functions.
If it isn't known, how can you or anyone else claim that someone else is wrong?
What you appear to be suggesting is this.
No, I seem to be understanding quite well and clearly demonstrating why you are wrong.
If enough people guess or make a stab in the dark about a particular unknown situation there is a chance that one may be correct by chance.
So if enough religious people guess or make a stab in the dark about a particular unknown situation (e.g. what happens after you die), there is a chance that one may be correct by chance?
Directly contradicting your prior claims that they are wrong.
What I’m suggesting is based on the fact that no one currently has any idea about the nature of the post death situation.
What you are suggesting goes directly against that fact.
You are acting like you know, as how else could you know they are wrong?
As you appear to be suggesting that one of them had a chance of being correct can you explain why you think that is the case. Can you also explain how that religion you are suggesting knows the answer arrived at it.
Again with the strawmen.
In my last post I explicitly pointed out the difference between being right and knowing.
Even if one of the religions were correct, that doesn't mean that they know rather than simply believe.
Just like in the dice example, just because one of the 6th people is right, that doesn't mean they know they are right.
I am saying because we don't know, there is the possibility (i.e. the chance) that at least one claim about what happens in an afterlife is correct.
That isn't me saying they are correct. That isn't me saying that they know. That is simply me saying there isn't enough information to determine if they are right or wrong.
This is in contrast to you who claims they are wrong.
Unless you know what happens, you cannot know that they are wrong.