They originated on the surface of Earth, and return to the surface of Earth. How difficult is that to understand?
It isn't a problem with understanding.
It is a problem with you just spouting BS.
Prove they originated on the surface, and then explain why that should make them return to the surface rather than the point they originated.
And then explain water and why it doesn't just go to the surface, where if you boil it, it goes up, and then when it condenses it goes back down.
And then explain why some things float on water, even though they originated on the surface of Earth according to your BS claims.
Where things originate is on the surface of Earth, which is the entire surface
Pure BS.
Things don't originate over an entire surface.
The originate at a point.
If you were born in Italy, or 'originated' in Italy, do you have to return to the hospital bed in Italy, to RETURN to where you originated?
That depends on how close to the point of origin you will count as returning to where you originated.
This is all based on an entirely subjective human idea of going back home.
If they were born in a small city and lived there most of their life, and then moved to another city in Italy, it would be them returning to their home city that would count.
If they went to another country, it would be returning to their home country that most would count.
Even being in Italian air-space would count for some people, you wouldn't need to be on the surface.
If they were jumping and in mid-air they would still be considered where they originated.
But according to your delusional nonsense, if you were born in Italy, and moved to New Zealand, as long as you were on the surface you are still where you originated.
Do you really think somewhere in New Zealand has returned to where they originated if they originated in Italy?
No. Not unless you are classing that point of origin as all of Earth.
As I've told you
You "telling me" isn't helping your case.
It is just more pathetic assertions without any justification or explanation.
a wind blows it 15 feet over, it does NOT magically have to 'return' to where it was earlier
Yet you claim if it is lifted a foot in the air it does have to magically return to where it was earlier.
Why should it matter in one direction but not another?
as I keep telling you, it is still where it originates
And you repeating the same false claim wont magically make it true.
It is not where it originated.
It was moved from where it originated.
What I'm talking about is an AREA of origin, which is the surface of Earth, or its waters, or within the heavens.
Which could be made into literally anything.
You could happily redefine it into a plane perpendicular to Earth oriented north-south, such that if it was moved east or west it would magically go back, but any other direction would be fine.
It is pure nonsense with no justification at all.
Regardless, an area of origin refers to the collection of points where multiple objects originated.
Saying the same old BS doesn't help your case.
I know, so why do you keep doing it?
I'd like to see ANY proof it exists!
You already know about it and have just rejected because it destroys your fantasy.
But like always you have no rational objection and instead just try to make it impossible.
Conversely, you have absolutely no evidence or justification for your delusional garbage.
You claim the moon is 'held' near Earth by your magical force, so if it can pull it, or hold it, 25,000 miles away, it should KEEP pulling it until it hits the Earth's surface.
And this just further shows your ignorance/dishonesty.
WHY?
Can you provide any justification at all for why it should do that?
Your claim is just as stupid as claiming that if you have an object tied to a string and spin it around your head, that because the string is applying a force accelerating it towards you, it should fly straight towards you and hit you in the head.
It is pure nonsense lacking any semblance of rational thought.
Just another pathetic dishonest FE claim to pretend there is a problem with gravity when they can't demonstrate any problem at all.
The moon is constantly accelerating towards Earth, as are all objects in orbit around Earth. But that doesn't mean they get closer.
Instead as they have lateral velocity as well, the acceleration towards Earth curves their path.
You can compare this to the acceleration required to follow a circular path.
That can be expressed as a=v^2/r=w^2*r
And it can be compared to the acceleration due to gravity in free-fall, a=GM/r^2.
So for an object in orbit, GM/r^2=v^2/r
so v^2=GM/r, so v=sqrt(GM/r).
If it is below this required speed, it will curve towards Earth.
But that also means it will speed up.
That means it can reach a point where it is going too fast for a circular orbit and it starts going back up.
This produces an elliptical orbit.
So the moon, when it is closer to Earth is going much faster and that means it isn't enough for the force to just be greater, it needs to be much greater to overcome that faster velocity. As it isn't, the moon remains in an elliptical orbit, rather than crashing into Earth.
astro-nots
What are they? Are they another fantasy of yours?
All by 'magic' as usual!
No, by simple physics, which anyone with a brain who chooses to use it can understand.
You are the one relying on pure magic.
Pure magic which causes objects to magically return to the surface of Earth, except when they decide not to.
What would your 'available evidence' be, specifically?
Stop just playing dumb.
You know what the evidence is. It has been pointed out plenty of times.
There are meteors from space, which you can provide nothing to refute, and the simple everyday occurrence of rain which you still can't deal with because it destroys your fantasy.
What do you believe the gazillion objects which are on Earth, and have always been, as WE know it, would be considered? Is that NOT evidence to you?
How may times must it be repeated before it sinks in:
THAT IS YOUR BASELESS CLAIM!
That baseless claim of yours is not evidence of that baseless claim.
Why would any sane person take that baseless claim of yous as evidence?
We don't know that everything has always been on Earth.
We have plenty of examples of things which haven't.
That includes both meteors which you dismiss as fake, and the simple everyday occurrence of rain.
You continually repeating the same pathetic BS won't magically make it true.