Correct. I did write x.
Meant to write z.
Which means it will work for the north pole and south pole, and no where else.
All you are doing is pushing the problem around.
More to the point, you probably know exactly what was meant to communicated and this is just another example of you feigning awareness of the point in effort to score points in your fucked up game.
No, in fact, I assumed you meant x.
Do you know why?
Because you started that line of garbage after it was pointed out that there are 2 points in the sky that the stars appear to rotate about.
For your fantasy flat Earth, if your axis is horizontal, then you get 2 points in the sky (near the horizon, one in the +x direction, one in the -x direction).
If it is vertical, then you get 1 point in the sky, and 1 point below Earth, with Earth blocking the view.
But additionally, as I have pointed out, the angle of the axis varies with location on Earth.
You could have said the axis is it any angle, including horizontal or vertical, and you would have been correct for 1 location, while being wrong for almost everywhere else.
Doubling down.
So you are doubling down on your wilful rejection of reality to try to pretend your fantasy works?
I do not need to "back up" my claim.
I claimed it, you have a choice to accept it or not.
And I reject it, as it is pure BS, as already explained.
You are a pathetic DARPA AI bot.
So you are saying that you are so bad, you can easily be refuted by a bot which isn't even sentient.
Do you really want to insult yourself like that?
Again, you are wrong.
What I wrote is axiomatic.
And again, rather than even try to justify your BS, you just make another baseless assertion.
If you were correct, and it was axiomatic, it would be fairly trivial for you to justify your BS.
It would be trivial for you to explain just what part I was wrong about.
But instead, you just assert that you are right.
Truly pathetic.
The little bit you stole from the math homework site, where you refine it to be all points m units from the x axis, that is axiomatic, as it then does describe a cylinder (or at least the walls of one)
But that was not your original claim.
You had to refine your claim to actually make it work. Your original claim was wrong.
If you refined it a different way, such as making it m units from the origin, then it is no longer a cylinder. Instead, it is a sphere.
If you instead let it be all points, then it is neither.
The earth is fla.
Deal with it.
And again, no argument, just pathetic, childish assertions.
You have no argument.
You have no rebuttal.
You have nothing to justify your BS.
It actually exactly describes what is proposed, and it also exactly describes how stars are viewed in the sky above us.
No it doesn't, as has already been explained. You ignoring that wont magically change it.
You have no argument, period.
Considering your entire argument is:
"Earth is flat, it works, anything you say is irrelevant/wrong."
you shouldn't be complaining about other people not having an argument.
Again, here is a brief summary that shows why you are just spouting BS:
On Earth, the real Earth that people live on, stars appear to trace a circle around 2 points in the sky, one due north, one due south.
As they appear to trace circles, that means you are looking at them from a negligible distance away from the axis of rotation, such a small distance away that it would not significantly affect the apparent direction of the central point about which the stars appear to rotate.
This means the axis of rotation is aligned with a line going directly from your eyes to that point the stars appear to rotate around.
But the point the stars appear to rotate around appears at a different angle of elevation, with this variance relating quite well to latitude.
This means the angle between the axis of rotation and the surface of Earth varies with latitude.
This means the angle of Earth surface at one latitude is different to the angle of Earth's surface at another latitude.
This means Earth can't be flat.
Until you can actually deal with that argument, rather than just rejecting reality and asserting Earth is flat, you have nothing and you are wrong.