Jwst launches in less than 3 hours

  • 1802 Replies
  • 229007 Views
*

JJA

  • 6873
  • +2/-6
  • Math is math!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1290 on: May 09, 2022, 05:57:03 PM »
I have visited the NASA website ... but it doesn't make any sense.

Yes, we all know you can't seem to understand anything.

I'm sure you can't figure out how they fit 10 million moving mirrors into your TV either.  But a DLP is real, no matter how confused it makes you.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1291 on: May 09, 2022, 07:36:17 PM »
“The Near Infrared Camera (NIRCam) is Webb's primary imager that will cover the infrared wavelength range 0.6 to 5 microns. NIRCam will detect light from: the earliest stars and galaxies in the process of formation, the population of stars in nearby galaxies, as well as young stars in the Milky Way and Kuiper Belt objects.”

https://jwst.nasa.gov/content/observatory/instruments/nircam.html

It seems that the Webb camera cannot take any pictures of the end/beginning of the Universe billions of light years away but only snap shots of nearby objects. Personally I am just interested in a photo of planet Pluto that I cannot see from my window.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45077
  • +87/-101
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1292 on: May 09, 2022, 08:17:49 PM »
Thanks for comment. Try to spell my name right. It should be clear to anyone that I consider the JWST utter nonsense and of no value at all.
I keep telling you that JWST wasn't made for you.  It was made for professional astronomers who can get value from it.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45077
  • +87/-101
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1293 on: May 09, 2022, 08:30:52 PM »
It seems that the Webb camera cannot take any pictures of the end/beginning of the Universe billions of light years away but only snap shots of nearby objects.
It seems that you don't understand what "near infrared" means. ::)

Personally I am just interested in a photo of planet Pluto that I cannot see from my window.
That's what the New Horizons mission was for.
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/new-horizons/in-depth/
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1294 on: May 09, 2022, 09:52:16 PM »
It seems that the Webb camera cannot take any pictures of the end/beginning of the Universe billions of light years away but only snap shots of nearby objects.
It seems that you don't understand what "near infrared" means. ::)

Personally I am just interested in a photo of planet Pluto that I cannot see from my window.
That's what the New Horizons mission was for.
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/new-horizons/in-depth/

Thanks, but I have already seen that photo of Pluto with rivers and sand bottoms, blablabli.  Now I want a new photo of Pluto by JWST to see if Pluto hasn't changed.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2022, 06:14:38 AM by Heiwa »

*

JJA

  • 6873
  • +2/-6
  • Math is math!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1295 on: May 10, 2022, 08:58:40 AM »
It seems that the Webb camera cannot take any pictures of the end/beginning of the Universe billions of light years away but only snap shots of nearby objects.
It seems that you don't understand what "near infrared" means. ::)

I am laughing my ass off at that one. That's a new low, even for him.

Near infrared sensors can't take pictures of things far away. Brilliant.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1296 on: May 10, 2022, 09:12:37 AM »
Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a spectroscopic method that uses the near-infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum (from 780 nm to 2500 nm). I wonder what it has to do with topic ... JWST?

Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy is based on molecular overtone and combination vibrations. Such transitions are forbidden by the selection rules of quantum mechanics.

As a result, the molar absorptivity (!!!) in the near-IR region is typically quite small.  One advantage is that NIR can typically penetrate much further into a sample than mid infrared radiation. Near-infrared spectroscopy is, therefore, not a particularly sensitive technique, but it can be very useful in probing bulk material with little or no sample preparation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near-infrared_spectroscopy

*

Stash

  • Ethical Stash
  • 13398
  • +2/-2
  • I am car!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1297 on: May 10, 2022, 12:18:29 PM »
Pretty complex stuff:

*

Stash

  • Ethical Stash
  • 13398
  • +2/-2
  • I am car!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1298 on: May 10, 2022, 04:59:34 PM »
Spitzer versus JWST:


The Large Magellanic Cloud blooms into clarity as this image transitions from what Spitzer saw to what Webb sees.

?

blademan9999

  • 250
  • +0/-0
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1299 on: May 10, 2022, 09:13:29 PM »
It seems that the Webb camera cannot take any pictures of the end/beginning of the Universe billions of light years away but only snap shots of nearby objects.
It seems that you don't understand what "near infrared" means. ::)

Personally I am just interested in a photo of planet Pluto that I cannot see from my window.
That's what the New Horizons mission was for.
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/new-horizons/in-depth/

Thanks, but I have already seen that photo of Pluto with rivers and sand bottoms, blablabli.  Now I want a new photo of Pluto by JWST to see if Pluto hasn't changed.

They can take photos of it with Hubble or other telescopes, not as much detail,  by good enough for most purposes

*

Stash

  • Ethical Stash
  • 13398
  • +2/-2
  • I am car!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1300 on: May 10, 2022, 09:28:35 PM »
New Horizons versus humble Hubble:


*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1301 on: May 11, 2022, 03:53:50 AM »
New Horizons versus humble Hubble:



So when will we see a picture of Pluto by the JWST?

*

Stash

  • Ethical Stash
  • 13398
  • +2/-2
  • I am car!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1302 on: May 11, 2022, 07:48:52 AM »
New Horizons versus humble Hubble:



So when will we see a picture of Pluto by the JWST?

How would I know?

*

Crouton

  • Flat Earth Inspector General of High Fashion Crimes and Misdemeanors
  • 17037
  • +5/-4
  • He who walks away from Omelas
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1303 on: May 11, 2022, 07:50:34 AM »
New Horizons versus humble Hubble:



So when will we see a picture of Pluto by the JWST?

Soon.  It's schedule to be released when we see pictures of Uranus.
Intelligentia et magnanimitas vincvnt violentiam et desperationem.
The truth behind NASA's budget

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1304 on: May 11, 2022, 11:02:15 PM »
I am personally not interested in Uranus, which I can see from my window. It looks like star, but as it orbits the Sun, it is a planet. It, or its atmosphere, just reflects the light from the Sun, so it can be seen by me. What is below the Uranus atmosphere, nobody knows except some asstroexperts that believe it is frozen liquids. How Uranus came about is also unknown by the same experts. I think it has always existed like the rest of the universe. The JWST will not find anything new by taking a photo of Uranus.

*

Stash

  • Ethical Stash
  • 13398
  • +2/-2
  • I am car!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1305 on: May 11, 2022, 11:09:22 PM »
I am personally not interested in Uranus, which I can see from my window. It looks like star, but as it orbits the Sun, it is a planet. It, or its atmosphere, just reflects the light from the Sun, so it can be seen by me. What is below the Uranus atmosphere, nobody knows except some asstroexperts that believe it is frozen liquids. How Uranus came about is also unknown by the same experts. I think it has always existed like the rest of the universe. The JWST will not find anything new by taking a photo of Uranus.

I'm pretty sure you are not qualified to determine what can be learned or not regarding the cosmos. I'm going to leave that up to the experts. Of which you are not one as you are a lone conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge regarding the topic at hand. Hardly the credentials required to make such statements credible.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1306 on: May 12, 2022, 02:55:12 AM »
I am personally not interested in Uranus, which I can see from my window. It looks like star, but as it orbits the Sun, it is a planet. It, or its atmosphere, just reflects the light from the Sun, so it can be seen by me. What is below the Uranus atmosphere, nobody knows except some asstroexperts that believe it is frozen liquids. How Uranus came about is also unknown by the same experts. I think it has always existed like the rest of the universe. The JWST will not find anything new by taking a photo of Uranus.

I'm pretty sure you are not qualified to determine what can be learned or not regarding the cosmos. I'm going to leave that up to the experts. Of which you are not one as you are a lone conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge regarding the topic at hand. Hardly the credentials required to make such statements credible.
Let's face it. The Hubble space telescope hasn't found anything explaining the origin of the universe. And now JWST (topic) shall do it, as it has better equipment, etc. But there is nothing to explain. The universe is just full of galaxies that are full of stars in all directions where ever you look ... and that's all. No Black Holes. No end. No beginning. Only us on Earth - at the center of it. I like it just looking out of my window.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2022, 07:42:24 AM by Heiwa »

*

Stash

  • Ethical Stash
  • 13398
  • +2/-2
  • I am car!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1307 on: May 12, 2022, 11:26:24 AM »
I am personally not interested in Uranus, which I can see from my window. It looks like star, but as it orbits the Sun, it is a planet. It, or its atmosphere, just reflects the light from the Sun, so it can be seen by me. What is below the Uranus atmosphere, nobody knows except some asstroexperts that believe it is frozen liquids. How Uranus came about is also unknown by the same experts. I think it has always existed like the rest of the universe. The JWST will not find anything new by taking a photo of Uranus.

I'm pretty sure you are not qualified to determine what can be learned or not regarding the cosmos. I'm going to leave that up to the experts. Of which you are not one as you are a lone conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge regarding the topic at hand. Hardly the credentials required to make such statements credible.
Let's face it. The Hubble space telescope hasn't found anything explaining the origin of the universe. And now JWST (topic) shall do it, as it has better equipment, etc. But there is nothing to explain. The universe is just full of galaxies that are full of stars in all directions where ever you look ... and that's all. No Black Holes. No end. No beginning. Only us on Earth - at the center of it. I like it just looking out of my window.

Your opinion is irrelevant.

I'm pretty sure you are not qualified to determine what can be learned or not regarding the cosmos. I'm going to leave that up to the experts. Of which you are not one as you are a lone conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge regarding the topic at hand. Hardly the credentials required to make such statements credible.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1308 on: May 12, 2022, 05:18:52 PM »
Why do you suggest that I am a lone conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge regarding the topic at hand? There is no conspiracy about JWST or cosmos. I just happen to doubt in writing what NASA/ESA has to say about it and the money used by them to explore the cosmos, i.e. there is plenty ‘fake news’ around to fool us.

*

Stash

  • Ethical Stash
  • 13398
  • +2/-2
  • I am car!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1309 on: May 12, 2022, 06:01:29 PM »
Why do you suggest that I am a lone conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge regarding the topic at hand? There is no conspiracy about JWST or cosmos. I just happen to doubt in writing what NASA/ESA has to say about it and the money used by them to explore the cosmos, i.e. there is plenty ‘fake news’ around to fool us.

For one, you are a lone conspiracy theorist. The absolute definition of one. And to doubt the capabilities of JWST requires a conspiracy of lies to be at play. Ergo, that makes you a conspiracy theorist. Period.
For two, you've already expressed that your belief is that JWST is a conspiratorial lie. We get it. That's your opinion. Why do you feel the need to keep writing that over and over again, especially with no knowledge or evidence applied. Your opinion has been duly noted. Why keep being boring? You offer nothing new, informational, or interesting, just, "JWST can't do what 1000's of learned people say it can do and we don't need it anyway because I have a window and I know more than 1000's of learned people who work/worked on it and will use it for its intended purposes for the next decade or so..." Boring and useless. Your opinion is irrelevant. Especially when you just keep droning on about the same things you know nothing about.

Simple as that.

*

Wolvaccine

  • EXTRA SPICY MODE
  • 25833
  • +3/-2
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1310 on: May 12, 2022, 06:15:57 PM »
Why do you suggest that I am a lone conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge regarding the topic at hand? There is no conspiracy about JWST or cosmos. I just happen to doubt in writing what NASA/ESA has to say about it and the money used by them to explore the cosmos, i.e. there is plenty ‘fake news’ around to fool us.

OK. You doubt what they say. Good for you. Why are you interested in this thread then? Go troll mikeman's thread you hijacked to make about you

Quote from: sokarul
what website did you use to buy your wife? Did you choose Chinese over Russian because she can't open her eyes to see you?

What animal relates to your wife?

Know your place

*

JJA

  • 6873
  • +2/-6
  • Math is math!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1311 on: May 12, 2022, 06:31:22 PM »
Why do you suggest that I am a lone conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge regarding the topic at hand?

You have demonstrated countless times your ignorance on even the basic facts of things you comment on.

You being a conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge is simply a proven fact at this point. :)

The subject is the Jwst and visit my website.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1312 on: May 12, 2022, 09:19:43 PM »
Why do you suggest that I am a lone conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge regarding the topic at hand? There is no conspiracy about JWST or cosmos. I just happen to doubt in writing what NASA/ESA has to say about it and the money used by them to explore the cosmos, i.e. there is plenty ‘fake news’ around to fool us.

For one, you are a lone conspiracy theorist. The absolute definition of one. And to doubt the capabilities of JWST requires a conspiracy of lies to be at play. Ergo, that makes you a conspiracy theorist. Period.
For two, you've already expressed that your belief is that JWST is a conspiratorial lie. We get it. That's your opinion. Why do you feel the need to keep writing that over and over again, especially with no knowledge or evidence applied. Your opinion has been duly noted. Why keep being boring? You offer nothing new, informational, or interesting, just, "JWST can't do what 1000's of learned people say it can do and we don't need it anyway because I have a window and I know more than 1000's of learned people who work/worked on it and will use it for its intended purposes for the next decade or so..." Boring and useless. Your opinion is irrelevant. Especially when you just keep droning on about the same things you know nothing about.
 
Simple as that.
No, the definition of a conspiracy is a secret plan by a group of people to do something unlawful or harmful and here some  NASA clowns are just producing nonsense about the cosmos and the JWST = no conspiracy. They do it for the money. Like Hollywood. Entertainment. You seem to believe that their nonsense is real. I look out of my window and know it is nonsense. Like the US Space Shuttle - https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&p=2416158&sid=0a336ebcb43619f124592624c57bc894#p2416158
« Last Edit: May 12, 2022, 09:38:16 PM by Heiwa »

*

Stash

  • Ethical Stash
  • 13398
  • +2/-2
  • I am car!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1313 on: May 12, 2022, 11:08:51 PM »
Why do you suggest that I am a lone conspiracy theorist with little to no knowledge regarding the topic at hand? There is no conspiracy about JWST or cosmos. I just happen to doubt in writing what NASA/ESA has to say about it and the money used by them to explore the cosmos, i.e. there is plenty ‘fake news’ around to fool us.

For one, you are a lone conspiracy theorist. The absolute definition of one. And to doubt the capabilities of JWST requires a conspiracy of lies to be at play. Ergo, that makes you a conspiracy theorist. Period.
For two, you've already expressed that your belief is that JWST is a conspiratorial lie. We get it. That's your opinion. Why do you feel the need to keep writing that over and over again, especially with no knowledge or evidence applied. Your opinion has been duly noted. Why keep being boring? You offer nothing new, informational, or interesting, just, "JWST can't do what 1000's of learned people say it can do and we don't need it anyway because I have a window and I know more than 1000's of learned people who work/worked on it and will use it for its intended purposes for the next decade or so..." Boring and useless. Your opinion is irrelevant. Especially when you just keep droning on about the same things you know nothing about.
 
Simple as that.
No, the definition of a conspiracy is a secret plan by a group of people to do something unlawful or harmful and here some  NASA clowns are just producing nonsense about the cosmos and the JWST = no conspiracy. They do it for the money. Like Hollywood. Entertainment. You seem to believe that their nonsense is real. I look out of my window and know it is nonsense. Like the US Space Shuttle - https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&p=2416158&sid=0a336ebcb43619f124592624c57bc894#p2416158

You really don't know much about anything, do you?

Let me lay it out for you...

Your thing is that the JWST project is a fraud and doesn't do anything that people claim it does. It took a massive "group" of people to design, engineer, build, test and operate it. And the "group" is lying about it all and its capabilities.

- "Group" lying - The first part of your conspiracy definition

You contend that they are doing it for the money. I.e., making false claims about its capabilities for money. That is known as "fraud".

- "Fraud" - Unlawful, the second part of your conspiracy definition.

By definition, to you, JWST is a conspiracy by a group committing fraud. That's your opinion, your theory. That makes you a conspiracy theorist. Get over it, that's literally what you are.

Not to mention the fact that you have no evidence for a conspiracy, just your opinion. Which makes you one of those lame nutty conspiracy theorists just yelling on a street corner.

So, where does that leave us? You, a conspiracy theorist, believes everyone involved is lying about JWST capabilities and defrauding citizens of their tax dollars spent on a lie. Again, we get it. That's your opinion without and facts. Fine. Do you want to just keep stomping your feet and posting the same conspiracy theory opinion over, and over, and over again? Why? It's boring. And no one believes anytjhing you say is credible anyway. What's your point? What's your purpose?

Maybe I should just create a thread that says, "Heiwa has a window and that's all he needs to understand everything about the cosmos and thinks JWST is a conspiratorial fraud". Then you can just keep typing posts into it about your window for as long as you want. That's literally all you're doing here. You've got some screws loose or you're just a really boring, one-note person. There's no dimension to what you add. Completely flat, desperately lacking in facts, knowledge, intellect, and ingenuity. Just the tired old mantra about your window. It's really quite sad.

In the mean time, I can't wait for more images like this and even better:


*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1314 on: May 12, 2022, 11:44:02 PM »
Can’t you read what I write ? A conspiracy is unlawful and harmful. The JWST is just stupid bullshit of design, engineering, building, testing and operation of a 2022 model space telescope. It cannot possibly take a picture of the beginning/end of the Universe 15 billion light years away.  It is like the gravity assist kicks to explore our little Solar system in the past - https://heiwaco.com/moontravelc.htm - complete nonsense. Imagine it took NASA spacecraft Voyager 2 12 years just to fly to Neptunus and pass it … to take one picture. Fantastic.
« Last Edit: May 12, 2022, 11:58:48 PM by Heiwa »

*

Stash

  • Ethical Stash
  • 13398
  • +2/-2
  • I am car!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1315 on: May 13, 2022, 01:41:34 AM »
Can’t you read what I write ? A conspiracy is unlawful and harmful. The JWST is just stupid bullshit of design, engineering, building, testing and operation of a 2022 model space telescope. It cannot possibly take a picture of the beginning/end of the Universe 15 billion light years away.  It is like the gravity assist kicks to explore our little Solar system in the past - https://heiwaco.com/moontravelc.htm - complete nonsense. Imagine it took NASA spacecraft Voyager 2 12 years just to fly to Neptunus and pass it … to take one picture. Fantastic.

There's nothing about a conspiracy theory that requires it be "harmful". You fit the definition of a conspiracy theorist to a tee. That is what is known as a fact. Something you seem to have no regard for. That's just the sad truth.

And, ummm, Voyager didn't take just 1 picture of Neptune. Wow, you really don't know much about anything.

Lastly, we're talking about JWST. Not Voyager, not the moon, or any of your other conspiracy theories. So, reporting you for spamming your site, again, that is chock full of off-topic conspiracy theories.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1316 on: May 13, 2022, 02:01:20 AM »
Can’t you read what I write ? A conspiracy is unlawful and harmful. The JWST is just stupid bullshit of design, engineering, building, testing and operation of a 2022 model space telescope. It cannot possibly take a picture of the beginning/end of the Universe 15 billion light years away.  It is like the gravity assist kicks to explore our little Solar system in the past - https://heiwaco.com/moontravelc.htm - complete nonsense. Imagine it took NASA spacecraft Voyager 2 12 years just to fly to Neptunus and pass it … to take one picture. Fantastic.

There's nothing about a conspiracy theory that requires it be "harmful". You fit the definition of a conspiracy theorist to a tee. That is what is known as a fact. Something you seem to have no regard for. That's just the sad truth.

And, ummm, Voyager didn't take just 1 picture of Neptune. Wow, you really don't know much about anything.

Lastly, we're talking about JWST. Not Voyager, not the moon, or any of your other conspiracy theories. So, reporting you for spamming your site, again, that is chock full of off-topic conspiracy theories.
Thanks for comments. Topic is JWST that I believe is a stupid hoax by NASA as usual, which I explain at my website since many, many years. The search engines find it, so spamming is not needed.  I don't sell anything. My info is free of charge. If you want me to inspect ships, it costs as usual. But I am happily retired in Southern France, and quite rich, so I just comment the US space jokes for fun.

*

JJA

  • 6873
  • +2/-6
  • Math is math!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1317 on: May 13, 2022, 04:30:10 AM »
Can’t you read what I write ? A conspiracy is unlawful and harmful.

You mean, can't we read what random things you copy-paste?  Here is the actual definition.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy

conspiracy - noun
1: the act of conspiring together
2a: an agreement among conspirators
b: a group of conspirators


Now, what YOU are quoting is further down on that page... LOL.  You never cease to amuse.

Kids Definition of conspiracy
1: a secret agreement to do something harmful or unlawful
2: the act of plotting with others to do something harmful or unlawful
3: a group of conspirators


Thanks for comments. Topic is JWST, visit my website.

*

Heiwa

  • 10394
  • +0/-0
  • I have been around a long time.
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1318 on: May 13, 2022, 05:22:44 AM »
Can’t you read what I write ? A conspiracy is unlawful and harmful.

You mean, can't we read what random things you copy-paste?  Here is the actual definition.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy

conspiracy - noun
1: the act of conspiring together
2a: an agreement among conspirators
b: a group of conspirators


Now, what YOU are quoting is further down on that page... LOL.  You never cease to amuse.

Kids Definition of conspiracy
1: a secret agreement to do something harmful or unlawful
2: the act of plotting with others to do something harmful or unlawful
3: a group of conspirators


Thanks for comments. Topic is JWST, visit my website.
Thanks, the JWST is what it is by definition. But what is it?

*

JJA

  • 6873
  • +2/-6
  • Math is math!
Re: Jwst launches in less than 3 hours
« Reply #1319 on: May 13, 2022, 05:31:57 AM »
Thanks, the JWST is what it is by definition. But what is it?

It's something far too complex for you to understand, apparently.

Thanks for comments. Topic is JWST, visit my website.