Jwst launches in less than 3 hours

Quote from: Timeisup on April 19, 2022, 01:48:58 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on April 19, 2022, 01:54:11 AM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 18, 2022, 08:33:42 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on April 18, 2022, 06:32:58 PM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 15, 2022, 03:36:41 AM

All you have there is a bunch of unsupported claims, with no evidence for them.
The Twin towers were the tallest buildings in the city. There's going to be large numbers of people observing them at any time, Especially after a terrorist attack against one of them is reported.
If the Towers collapsed without planes, there would be videos that support that, there would be videos of of the south tower going from fine to damaged without anything hitting it.

Tens of thousands of people work in each tower, the attacks happened during the work day. There were tens of thousands of people who escaped the tower.
If you want to claim they were prevented from entering, there there absolutely WOULD be evidence of this.

Not really. Many people watched the complete WTC at New York being destroyed live on TV and it was a nice show ... but it was a show. I had earlier visited the office of the American Bureau of Shipping in one of the towers and it looked deserted already then. ABS moved out to the suburbs and nobody died. Like the JWST that took off from Earth in December and moved to space  and which is now cooling down at L2 ready to send pictures of the end of the Universe billions of light years away. People think it is fantastic. I think it is a hoax.

And thousands of people watched it in real life. In fact, there were likely thousands who’s offices were situated in such a way that they would have the towers in their field of vew while they were working.

Yes I know. I visited ABS in one of the WTC towers 1998 to discuss the Coulombi Egg tanker design (see other thread) and they were relocating and moving out to New Jersey. It seemed the tower was empty when I was there but do not tell FBI that. The two towers were structurally just like a bird cage with floors and full of air, top of which could not crush down the bottom as suggested by various structural engineers afterwards. I have myself written a scientific, peer reviewed paper about progressive structural collapses at the request of Northwestern University, Chicagb. But when I was going to present it 2013, it seemed FBI called the university and stopped my presentation - EMI - Evanston, 8/2013. Since then I do not visit USA any longer. It is not safe.

Are you real? Where was the paper reviewed? Where  can it be accessed?
Could you not provide a link?

http://heiwaco.com/emi2013.htm

Quote from: Heiwa on April 19, 2022, 08:31:03 PM

Quote from: Timeisup on April 19, 2022, 01:48:58 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on April 19, 2022, 01:54:11 AM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 18, 2022, 08:33:42 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on April 18, 2022, 06:32:58 PM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 15, 2022, 03:36:41 AM

All you have there is a bunch of unsupported claims, with no evidence for them.
The Twin towers were the tallest buildings in the city. There's going to be large numbers of people observing them at any time, Especially after a terrorist attack against one of them is reported.
If the Towers collapsed without planes, there would be videos that support that, there would be videos of of the south tower going from fine to damaged without anything hitting it.

Tens of thousands of people work in each tower, the attacks happened during the work day. There were tens of thousands of people who escaped the tower.
If you want to claim they were prevented from entering, there there absolutely WOULD be evidence of this.

Not really. Many people watched the complete WTC at New York being destroyed live on TV and it was a nice show ... but it was a show. I had earlier visited the office of the American Bureau of Shipping in one of the towers and it looked deserted already then. ABS moved out to the suburbs and nobody died. Like the JWST that took off from Earth in December and moved to space  and which is now cooling down at L2 ready to send pictures of the end of the Universe billions of light years away. People think it is fantastic. I think it is a hoax.

And thousands of people watched it in real life. In fact, there were likely thousands who’s offices were situated in such a way that they would have the towers in their field of vew while they were working.

Yes I know. I visited ABS in one of the WTC towers 1998 to discuss the Coulombi Egg tanker design (see other thread) and they were relocating and moving out to New Jersey. It seemed the tower was empty when I was there but do not tell FBI that. The two towers were structurally just like a bird cage with floors and full of air, top of which could not crush down the bottom as suggested by various structural engineers afterwards. I have myself written a scientific, peer reviewed paper about progressive structural collapses at the request of Northwestern University, Chicago. But when I was going to present it 2013, it seemed FBI called the university and stopped my presentation - EMI - Evanston, 8/2013. Since then I do not visit USA any longer. It is not safe.

Are you real? Where was the paper reviewed? Where  can it be accessed?
Could you not provide a link?

http://heiwaco.com/emi2013.htm

Stop linking to your shitty site, link to the paper.

Mr. Bjorkman:

We regret to inform you that, after further technical evaluation, the EMI 2013 conference organization found your abstract not meeting the standards of the conference. Hence, we withdraw acceptance of your abstract which will not be featured in the conference program and book of abstracts. We apologize for this very late notice due to an oversight on our side and we will process full reimbursement of your registration.

In addition, we would like to clarify that the EMI 2013 conference organization does not support and does not endorse any of the opinions you express in your website http://heiwaco.tripod.com/emi2013.htm . Hence, please, refrain yourself from using the EMI 2013 logo which is copyrighted material from our EMI 2013 conference website.

Finally, it is important to point out that, contrarily to what is stated in your website, the EMI 2013 conference organization

(1) did not peer review any full paper containing the material discussed in the aforementioned website (the EMI 2013 conference does not feature full-paper proceedings) ;

(2) your abstract was not submitted upon our invitation but rather it was one of the several hundreds of unsolicited submissions we received.

Gianluca Cusatis

EMI 2013 Conference Chair

From your site:

Quote

Mr. Bjorkman:

We regret to inform you that, after further technical evaluation, the EMI 2013 conference organization found your abstract not meeting the standards of the conference. Hence, we withdraw acceptance of your abstract which will not be featured in the conference program and book of abstracts. We apologize for this very late notice due to an oversight on our side and we will process full reimbursement of your registration.

In addition, we would like to clarify that the EMI 2013 conference organization does not support and does not endorse any of the opinions you express in your website http://heiwaco.tripod.com/emi2013.htm . Hence, please, refrain yourself from using the EMI 2013 logo which is copyrighted material from our EMI 2013 conference website.

Finally, it is important to point out that, contrarily to what is stated in your website, the EMI 2013 conference organization

(1) did not peer review any full paper containing the material discussed in the aforementioned website (the EMI 2013 conference does not feature full-paper proceedings) ;

(2) your abstract was not submitted upon our invitation but rather it was one of the several hundreds of unsolicited submissions we received.

Gianluca Cusatis

EMI 2013 Conference Chair

So, essentially, you sent them an unsolicited "paper" that was so bad that they didn't even make it past the abstract. It wasn’t even rejected due technical deficiencies - the introduction was bad enough.

Also note that they specifically state, contrary to your claim, your paper has not been peer reviewed.
approved
They wanted nothing to do with your bull. 

What an amazing fail! 

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.693.9326&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Heiwa, you might want to read this.

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 20, 2022, 02:17:01 AM

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.693.9326&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Heiwa, you might want to read this.

I have read it years ago. Complete nonsense by Greening, e.g. we (i.e. Greening) have shown in this report that because of the failure of just one floor, a sequential collapse of all remaining 109  floors were inevitable. ROTFL Try to show it in a laboratory.

Quote from: JJA on April 19, 2022, 04:15:27 PM

The JWST's communication systems are capable of transmitting 270 Gb a day.
Crazy to think we have a 10Mb/s out to a satellite in L2 when large sections of our own planet don't have that kind of speed.

Isn't 270 Gb a day 3,125 Mb/s?

Can't you read? EMI contacted me! My paper was approved by EMI and put on the EMI programme and website. I prepared  my trip to Evanstone/Chicago. And suddenly EMI cancelled the whole lot. My paper was and is brilliant.

Quote from: Heiwa on April 20, 2022, 03:01:01 AM

Can't you read? EMI contacted me! My paper was approved by EMI and put on the EMI programme and website. I prepared  my trip to Evanstone/Chicago. And suddenly EMI cancelled the whole lot. My paper was and is brilliant.

Yes, I can read, very well, thank you.  I am also adept at reading the meaning of things, not just the plain text.

Their letter to you says one thing to me: they had it checked by an actual engineer who reported back that it's garbage.

If your paper were brilliant they would not have later rejected it.  That they initially accepted is of no consequence, if that acceptance is later withdrawn.  This is not success. 

It is failure.

Read again the letter EMI sent to me. EMI contacted me earlier. I sent them my scientific paper . It was accepted and put on the EMI program and I was ready to go to the conference. And then all was cancelled and the EMI website disappeared, etc.

(2) your abstract was not submitted upon our invitation but rather it was one of the several hundreds of unsolicited submissions we received.

We regret to inform you that, after further technical evaluation, the EMI 2013 conference organization found your abstract not meeting the standards of the conference. Hence, we withdraw acceptance of your abstract which will not be featured in the conference program and book of abstracts. We apologize for this very late notice due to an oversight on our side and we will process full reimbursement of your registration.

In addition, we would like to clarify that the EMI 2013 conference organization does not support and does not endorse any of the opinions you express in your website http://heiwaco.tripod.com/emi2013.htm . Hence, please, refrain yourself from using the EMI 2013 logo which is copyrighted material from our EMI 2013 conference website.

Quote from: Heiwa on April 20, 2022, 04:32:18 AM

Read again the letter EMI sent to me. EMI contacted me earlier. I sent them my scientific paper . It was accepted and put on the EMI program and I was ready to go to the conference. And then all was cancelled and the EMI website disappeared, etc.

They did not contact you earlier, before you submitted your abstract.

Quote

(2) your abstract was not submitted upon our invitation but rather it was one of the several hundreds of unsolicited submissions we received.

Such a simple lie to disprove, but OK, I'll read it again. Here is the pertinent section:

Quote

We regret to inform you that, after further technical evaluation, the EMI 2013 conference organization found your abstract not meeting the standards of the conference. Hence, we withdraw acceptance of your abstract which will not be featured in the conference program and book of abstracts. We apologize for this very late notice due to an oversight on our side and we will process full reimbursement of your registration.

How else can one read this other than your abstract was initially accepted, but upon further inspection was deemed unacceptable?

They clearly reread your abstract, had a look at your website, and immediately realised you are a crank.

This can be evidenced by:

Quote

In addition, we would like to clarify that the EMI 2013 conference organization does not support and does not endorse any of the opinions you express in your website http://heiwaco.tripod.com/emi2013.htm . Hence, please, refrain yourself from using the EMI 2013 logo which is copyrighted material from our EMI 2013 conference website.

So, not only did they reject your abstract, they explicitly rejected the very foundation of your abstract.

Not only is your abstract a failure; your website, in the eyes of EMI, is also a failure.

Lets me ask you this question Heiwa
We have a thin wooden beam capable of holding up 500kg. It is capable of bending by 10cm before breaking.
If we drop a 10kg obect from 3 meter on to it, will it break? What about 20kg?

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 20, 2022, 03:48:19 AM

Lets me ask you this question Heiwa
We have a thin wooden beam capable of holding up 500kg. It is capable of bending by 10cm before breaking.
If we drop a 10kg obect from 3 meter on to it, will it break? What about 20kg?

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 20, 2022, 10:01:20 PM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 20, 2022, 03:48:19 AM

Lets me ask you this question Heiwa
We have a thin wooden beam capable of holding up 500kg. It is capable of bending by 10cm before breaking.
If we drop a 10kg obect from 3 meter on to it, will it break? What about 20kg?

You don't need to keep quoting yourself. He can't reply for a few more days. I forgot to update the ban list thread in AR, but that's why he isn't replying right now.

Quote from: boydster on April 21, 2022, 09:33:49 AM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 20, 2022, 10:01:20 PM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 20, 2022, 03:48:19 AM

Lets me ask you this question Heiwa
We have a thin wooden beam capable of holding up 500kg. It is capable of bending by 10cm before breaking.
If we drop a 10kg obect from 3 meter on to it, will it break? What about 20kg?

You don't need to keep quoting yourself. He can't reply for a few more days. I forgot to update the ban list thread in AR, but that's why he isn't replying right now.

Topic is the JWST taking pictures of the end of the Universe, where stars are born, etc. I have just updated http://heiwaco.com/moontravelb.htm recommending the JWST to take a picture of planet Pluto in our Solar system as a start.

Quote from: Heiwa on April 29, 2022, 06:17:34 AM

Quote from: boydster on April 21, 2022, 09:33:49 AM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 20, 2022, 10:01:20 PM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 20, 2022, 03:48:19 AM

Lets me ask you this question Heiwa
We have a thin wooden beam capable of holding up 500kg. It is capable of bending by 10cm before breaking.
If we drop a 10kg obect from 3 meter on to it, will it break? What about 20kg?

You don't need to keep quoting yourself. He can't reply for a few more days. I forgot to update the ban list thread in AR, but that's why he isn't replying right now.

Topic is the JWST taking pictures of the end of the Universe, where stars are born, etc. I have just updated http://heiwaco.com/moontravelb.htm recommending the JWST to take a picture of planet Pluto in our Solar system as a start.

New horizons already took pictures in more detail then the JWST did.

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 29, 2022, 10:37:19 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on April 29, 2022, 06:17:34 AM

Quote from: boydster on April 21, 2022, 09:33:49 AM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 20, 2022, 10:01:20 PM

Quote from: blademan9999 on April 20, 2022, 03:48:19 AM

Lets me ask you this question Heiwa
We have a thin wooden beam capable of holding up 500kg. It is capable of bending by 10cm before breaking.
If we drop a 10kg obect from 3 meter on to it, will it break? What about 20kg?

You don't need to keep quoting yourself. He can't reply for a few more days. I forgot to update the ban list thread in AR, but that's why he isn't replying right now.

Topic is the JWST taking pictures of the end of the Universe, where stars are born, etc. I have just updated http://heiwaco.com/moontravelb.htm recommending the JWST to take a picture of planet Pluto in our Solar system as a start.

New horizons already took pictures in more detail then the JWST did.

Yes, it took New Horizons seven years to do it. JWST has still not managed it even if I asked NASA to do it as a test.

Yes, it took New Horizons seven years to do it. JWST has still not managed it even if I asked NASA to do it as a test.

Quote from: Heiwa on April 29, 2022, 01:58:06 PM

Yes, it took New Horizons seven years to do it. JWST has still not managed it even if I asked NASA to do it as a test.

NASA takes imaging requests from professional astronomers who submit their requests through proper channels, not from random internet conspiracy theory nutters like you.

Quote from: markjo on April 29, 2022, 06:00:48 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on April 29, 2022, 01:58:06 PM

Yes, it took New Horizons seven years to do it. JWST has still not managed it even if I asked NASA to do it as a test.

NASA takes imaging requests from professional astronomers who submit their requests through proper channels, not from random internet conspiracy theory nutters like you.

I doubt it. Planet Pluto is flying around only 5.5 light minutes away from JWST and and a photo of it is a must as a test.

I am not a conspiracy nutter.

I know they are liars.

Quote from: Heiwa on April 29, 2022, 08:24:52 PM

Quote from: markjo on April 29, 2022, 06:00:48 PM

Quote from: Heiwa on April 29, 2022, 01:58:06 PM

Yes, it took New Horizons seven years to do it. JWST has still not managed it even if I asked NASA to do it as a test.

NASA takes imaging requests from professional astronomers who submit their requests through proper channels, not from random internet conspiracy theory nutters like you.

I doubt it. Planet Pluto is flying around only 5.5 light minutes away from JWST and and a photo of it is a must as a test.

Says who? I think we'll leave the decision regarding tests to the professionals, not a conspiracy nutter such as yourself.

Quote from: Heiwa on April 29, 2022, 08:24:52 PM

I am not a conspiracy nutter.

Yes you are.

Quote from: Heiwa on April 29, 2022, 08:24:52 PM

I know they are liars.

No you don't.

Says who? I think we'll leave the decision regarding tests to the professionals, not a conspiracy nutter such as yourself.

Quote from: Stash on April 30, 2022, 01:05:13 AM

Says who? I think we'll leave the decision regarding tests to the professionals, not a conspiracy nutter such as yourself.

They do sometimes open them up to non-professionals which is cool.  NASA and other large telescopes sometimes hold open house events where they ask for suggestions from the audience and in real time point some of the big telescopes at them.  I've been to one of them and it's very cool to get to see how things function as well as actually get to direct it.

I doubt it. Planet Pluto is flying around only 5.5 light minutes away from JWST and and a photo of it is a must as a test. The closest star is light years away in the Milky Way galaxy. But the purpose of the JWST is to check the dark end of Universe billions of light years away, which I wonder how JWST can see. It is really far away.

BTW I am not a conspiracy nutter. I simply don't believe in people having watched/witnessed/survived nuclear bombs exploding above them in Japan 1945, or US heroes saying that they have been in space and pissed on the Moon. I know they are liars.