I can hardly see the part in between when he raises the camera much more comes in view..
You mean you can see it, but it appears quite small.
Again, the important part is that it is there and visible. It is not hidden and the bottom of the car is not hidden.
Only the ends seem to curve down
This just shows you don't seem to understand how curvature or perspective works.
The close ones are close, and so the spacing between them takes up a large angular size.
They are also only a short distance away, so the effect of curvature is negligible.
The far away ones are much further away, so the spacing between them takes up a smaller angular size.
They are also much further away, where the curvature is more significant.
Those 2 effects combined mean that
it's clearly just an illusion because they are so far away.
No, it isn't, because being far away doesn't magically make things appear lower.
Why should perspective suddenly magically make things appear to sink?
In order for it to be an illusion with Earth being flat, you need something which changes with distance in a manner to turn a straight line into a curve, and perspective simply doesn't do that. Perspective keeps straight lines straight.
But curvature explains it quite well.
If it was curvature then all of them would be curving not just suddenly curving at the end and the earth would have to follow this path of curvature.
They are all curving, it is just the curvature is so small it takes quite a while for it to become noticeable.
Stop just asserting baseless nonsense because you don't like Earth being round. Try justifying it.
but im saying without it zoomed in when the camera is lower it looks like the car is at the end of the table zooming in gives a clearer view
Which is just you dishonestly continuing to deflect from the actual issue.
The issue is that the end of the table is visible.
Zooming in doesn't magically push the horizon further away.
So this in no way replicates what is observed on Earth.
And that means your claim that you can replicate what is observed on the ocean on a flat surface is a blatant lie.
Earth would also have to follow the path of curvature with the objects
And it does. That is why the base of the objects are obscured. Because Earth has curved down. You can't see it because Earth obstructs your view.
What you are doing is effectively claiming a hill can't be a hill because you can't see the other side of it.
Also if that is them really going over a curvature then what about when we raise altitude wouldn't we see them clearly over a curve?
In what way?
To be honest I feel like I can't carry on this debate if I can't post pictures or my videos to try and show you .
You could try being honest and try to justify your claims with logic and math rather than just continually asserting them.
What definitely doesn't work is linking to a bunch of videos which directly contradict your claims and don't help address the issues raised; nor does treating us like idiots.
I want you to visualise something, you need to understand how perspective works
We know how perspective works. You need to understand how it works and stop pretending it magically does things which it is physically impossible for it to do, which you can't replicate.
Perspective is quite simple, parallel lines converge at a point infinitely far away. The further away something is the smaller it is.
It doesn't magically make things sink, nor does it make straight lines curve.
though you need to understand how the ground seems to go upwards
And the bottom of all the objects are going up with it.
Notice how it doesn't just magically stop going up and instead start to go down?
That means it can't hide the bottom.
You could quickly draw a diagram showing this and you should see what I mean . Just draw a straight line representing the earth then on one side draw person a and the other side person b then draw lines from each person perspective showing this ramping effect what do you get ?
You would get an extremely dishonest diagram where you pretend this purely visual effect of perspective occurs physically to physically alter the ground.
Here is an example more honestly comparing the 2:
The solid lines are the physical height. Notice how the ground isn't physically going up?
The dotted line is the angular position.
For a FE, it never gets to the point where it obstructs thing further away.
Also notice how the angular position matches quite well for the FE and the RE until you get to the horizon (notice the very small size used for the scale on the right).
Here is an example of the angular position for a FE (although at the range this was showing it wouldn't matter):
The tree gets smaller, but the bottom is still on the ground, and still visible.
Me not being able to post pictures or videos has nothing to do with my intelligence or anything to do with how smart I am this website is just poorly made there is literally no option for me to click on to post stuff any other website all I do is click insert image there ain't no option on here.
Do you mean you didn't realise you can't upload images here and instead you need to upload them to a site like imgur and then post the embed code?
I have checked on my phone and the layout seems the same.