Oh I'll give an example of sicentific supression just to show it happens. Virginia Steen Macentyre lost her job and the findings supressed of her archaelogical discovery at Huaetlaco Mexico. See the movie "Mans Mysterious Origins" with Charelton Heston. She found artifacts which the newest dating procedures ofmthhe time stated to be over 100 thousand yrs old, although the mainstreasm timeline says people were not in that region more then i think 15 yrs ago...
That would be 15 000, not 15.
But this has been discussed. What makes you think the findings were suppressed?
She was even able to publish a paper with it.
It wasn't even her discovery. The site was discovered 4 years before she joined the team as a grad student.
As for losing her job, was that just her finishing her degree?
A grad student is not a permanent job.
That and cold fusion as I have brought up before
Which cannot be substantiated, and attempts to do so often have contradictory results.
Light bending of path of apparent sun could be like a rainbow
Care to provide an explanation of what is causing it? Because rainbows are quite well understood.
i heard tesla say the size of the earth is two times the wavelength of water molecule not sure just rememeber wavelength 2 times water. i know that is ambiguous but it might be useful info for the right person to hear.
Or, it might just be nonsense.
I think the depalma experiment of course would be some suppressed info.
Again, it isn't suppressed. You can easily find information on it. What you actually have is a very poorly controlled experiment.
Jack you said in one of your responses something "people dont like reality so they believe in their own fiction"... I just don't see how you could ever convince me of this
Try looking in the mirror.
Look at how much you cling to things which could benefit humanity or be good.
Would you be doing the same if instead of providing a benefit it would provide massive devistation?
Like if someone suggested cold fusion wouldn't solve power, but instead would wipe out all life within 1000 km?
Would you still eagerly try to defend cold fusion being real?
The religions say you can't see and are decieved
Of course they would say crap like that, to try to explain why reality doesn't match their claims.
But with something as base as the flat earth which i can see
You don't.
What you see is Earth. There are plenty of examples of where/how you can see curvature.
What you are appealing to is where you cannot tell if Earth is flat or round.
You dishonestly present that as seeing Earth as flat.
In reality it is no more you seeing Earth as flat as it is you seeing Earth as round.
You ASSUME it is flat, and because the observations match, you then stick with it, and ignore cases where it doesn't or look for excuses.
No illusions are required if Earth is round.
Go find the largest ball you can, and then look at it with your eye as close as possible and see if it looks as round from up close as from far away.