If there are 2 people on the planet who should be listened to with regards to covid, it's:
1) Dr Michael Yeadon: the Ex Pfizer Chief Scientist
2) Dr Robert Malone: the inventor of the mRNA vaccine
Perfect example of confirmation bias and cherry picking your experts, along with massive appeal to authority.
Dr Michael Yeadon was one ex-chief scientist of one department at one site of a massive multinational. There’s almost certainly dozens of ex-chief scientists from Pfizer alone.
He served as the chief scientist and vice-president of Pfizer's allergy and respiratory research unit in Sandwich, Kent, where he oversaw the development of drugs for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_YeadonNothing to do with covid or similar viruses and nothing to do with vaccines.
Dr Robert Malone did some early research on mRNA back in the late 80s and early 90s. To say he “invented mRNA vaccines” is a massive stretch.
He’s also done no research on covid or the vaccines that have been developed for it.
Tens of thousands of scientists are actually doing real research into it right now. Not just mouthing off on the internet.
So what makes these the two people on the planet you think should be listened to above all others? Perhaps because they say things that already fit with your conspiracy laden world view?
Both censored from all MSM and also from Twitter...
For making wild claims about both covid and the vaccines without the slightest shred of evidence. That’s not very scientific, is it?