A crescent moon would imply the moon is simply a piece of your rock.
Unless you mean a more illuminated are of the circle.
No, a crescent moon implies that only a portion of the visible portion of the moon is illuminated.
I have a suspicion here.
Scepti, can you define what you mean by Full Moon?
Being able to see a full moon face. The circle of what people know as, the moon.
Do you mean the full face lit up ("like a beacon" as you would say) or do you just mean the ability to see the moon?
After all, this did all start when someone showed the moon as a tiny crescent with you claiming someone can always see the full moon. That would imply the former, which is obviously false.
And again, where is your justification for 3000 l/hr?
And are you going to acknowledge that even with the insane numbers you provided, they would still get 2 hours out of that tank?
You people are the supposed geniuses. Figure it out.
I already have figured it out. You screwed up big time, but you need it, because you need the moon to always be full to pretend it should always be massively bright, to pretend the photos couldn't possibly have been taken on the moon.
Just like you need your ridiculous 3000 l/hr to pretend the tank couldn't last 30 minutes, even though if it was filled with liquid oxygen like you implied, it would last over 2 hours with that ridiculous 3000 l/hr.
And because you can't justify your lies, you just deflect.
I don't think I was trolling. I'm merely giving out what you people give out.
No you're not. We give out rational arguments, evidence and simple questions to show you are wrong (after already explaining why you are wrong).
You give out delusional BS and pathetic deflection.
And you most certainly appear to be trolling.
This deflection onto the ability to see the full moon started here:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=88640.msg2324784#msg2324784You claimed it was always lit up like a beacon, and in response an image of a crescent moon was provided, where one entire face of the moon was visible, but only a sliver illuminated.
That led you to claiming that we see a full moon all the time on Earth.
So no, it is quite clear you meant that you see the entire full moon lit up, as in the moon with the phase of a full moon.