Airlocks in the supposed LM's.

  • 405 Replies
  • 25155 Views
*

JackBlack

  • 18611
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #60 on: June 21, 2021, 01:00:41 AM »
I obviously still don't buy into it but at least it's showing explanations, however ridiculous they are.
You mean how ridiculous you and your pathetic dismissal is.

You are yet to show any problem at all, you are yet to show how any of it is ridiculous.
You just continually dismiss it as nonsense/ridiculous, because you refuse to accept reality.

Again, try to show an actual problem.

Those fuel tanks seem pretty triny when you consider what they supposedly had to do, don't you think?
No.
Again, provide the math to show a problem.
Stop just asserting there is one.

I'm sure there'll be an explanation but the tanks to land must be the same as the tanks to ascend...right?
You would have to be pretty foolish to think that.
They were performing fundamentally different tasks, with fundamentally different masses.
In case you forgot, there were 2 stages for a reason, the entirety of the descent stage was left behind, with only the ascent stage going back up.
That should already be a massive indication of a different requirment.

But of course, because you have no rational objection, you just come up with whatever nonsense you can to pretend there is a problem.

No issues were had because
Because of how gases actually work.
Again, if you want to claim there is a problem, prove it, stop just asserting it.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28515
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #61 on: June 21, 2021, 01:02:44 AM »

What makes you think they would need to repressurise the LM to refill their packs?

(All supposed).

So how do they fill their back packs and add water and new batteries and such in the LM if it's open to the vacuum?
Do divers come out of water and hook up to a refill then dive again?

Do you have an explanation?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28515
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #62 on: June 21, 2021, 01:03:55 AM »
You mean how ridiculous you and your pathetic dismissal is.

You're off again, aren't you?

*

Stash

  • 12439
  • I am car!
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #63 on: June 21, 2021, 01:04:31 AM »

...Not only this but the entire time spent breathing in pure oxygen should've killed those men...


Finally, we are informed (from a very thrustworthy source) why so many people suffering from COVID 19 and treated with pure oxygen in hospitals around the world have died. We are yet to be informed why the others, treated in the same way, somehow survived.
A relative of mine was taking n pure oxygen. But guess what?
My relative was doing it through a tube up the nose, aided by the atmosphere.

So called astronauts are apparently on it for days and dys from Earth lift off all the way to the so called moon then back.

No issues were had because in fantasy world you can achieve anything.

It's not fantasy, it's actually science. A quick poke around and you'll find perfectly reasonable explanations as to how Oxygen and pressure work. Being that you're all about pressure, you should know this. Ask any scuba diver and they can explain this as well:

"The oxygen that astronauts breathe in space is at a lower pressure than air pressure on earth. Apparently it is the pressure that would cause the problem rather than the concentration. The same applies to some deep sea divers.

The thing about oxygen toxicity is that it's exposure to a high partial pressure of O2 that is dangerous, not a high percentage. Similarly, you need a minimum partial pressure, not a minimum percentage. If you breathe a very low percentage oxygen gas at a very high pressure, your body still gets the correct amount of oxygen. If you breathe a very high percentage of oxygen at a very low pressure, you again get the correct amount of oxygen.

Some spacecraft, and most spacesuits, operate on pure O2 at a lower pressure than sea level. Because the astronaut is breathing a low pressure gas, their total exposure to Oxygen is not at a dangerous level.
"
Yes Stash.

I am clearly the product of castrated machine learning.

You are quite obviously, human.

*

Stash

  • 12439
  • I am car!
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #64 on: June 21, 2021, 01:14:43 AM »

What makes you think they would need to repressurise the LM to refill their packs?

(All supposed).

So how do they fill their back packs and add water and new batteries and such in the LM if it's open to the vacuum?
Do divers come out of water and hook up to a refill then dive again?

Do you have an explanation?

Apollo 17 EVA's:

"Approximately 47 minutes later, the powered descent to the lunar surface began. Landing occurred at 7:54:57 p.m. Dec. 11, at lunar latitude 20 degrees, 10 minutes north, and longitude 30 degrees 46 minutes east. Apollo 17 was the last lunar landing mission. Three extravehicular activities, or EVAs, lasted a total of 22 hours, four minutes on the lunar surface.
- EVA No. 1 began at 11:54:49 p.m. Dec. 11, with Eugene Cernan egressing at 12:01 a.m. Dec. 12. The first EVA was seven hours, 12 minutes long and was completed at 7:06:42 a.m. Dec. 12.
- The second EVA began at 11:28:06 p.m. Dec. 12, and lasted seven hours, 37 minutes, ending at at 7:05:02 a.m. Dec. 13.
- The final EVA began at 10:25:48 p.m. Dec. 13, and ended at 5:40:56 a.m. Dec. 14.
"
Yes Stash.

I am clearly the product of castrated machine learning.

You are quite obviously, human.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28515
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #65 on: June 21, 2021, 01:16:52 AM »

...Not only this but the entire time spent breathing in pure oxygen should've killed those men...


Finally, we are informed (from a very thrustworthy source) why so many people suffering from COVID 19 and treated with pure oxygen in hospitals around the world have died. We are yet to be informed why the others, treated in the same way, somehow survived.
A relative of mine was taking n pure oxygen. But guess what?
My relative was doing it through a tube up the nose, aided by the atmosphere.

So called astronauts are apparently on it for days and dys from Earth lift off all the way to the so called moon then back.

No issues were had because in fantasy world you can achieve anything.

It's not fantasy, it's actually science. A quick poke around and you'll find perfectly reasonable explanations as to how Oxygen and pressure work. Being that you're all about pressure, you should know this. Ask any scuba diver and they can explain this as well:

"The oxygen that astronauts breathe in space is at a lower pressure than air pressure on earth. Apparently it is the pressure that would cause the problem rather than the concentration. The same applies to some deep sea divers.

The thing about oxygen toxicity is that it's exposure to a high partial pressure of O2 that is dangerous, not a high percentage. Similarly, you need a minimum partial pressure, not a minimum percentage. If you breathe a very low percentage oxygen gas at a very high pressure, your body still gets the correct amount of oxygen. If you breathe a very high percentage of oxygen at a very low pressure, you again get the correct amount of oxygen.

Some spacecraft, and most spacesuits, operate on pure O2 at a lower pressure than sea level. Because the astronaut is breathing a low pressure gas, their total exposure to Oxygen is not at a dangerous level.
"
Of course you're going to get your oxygen...but, it's still dangerous and toxic in thats et up.

Any idea how Apollo 17 managed their oxy tank fills and depressurisations/repressurisations in the amount they needed?
Also whilst they're still doing this there's their spacesuits require the equalisation to the pressures because it all seems separate.

Any idea if they took off their space suits every time they entered the LM?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28515
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #66 on: June 21, 2021, 01:18:10 AM »

What makes you think they would need to repressurise the LM to refill their packs?

(All supposed).

So how do they fill their back packs and add water and new batteries and such in the LM if it's open to the vacuum?
Do divers come out of water and hook up to a refill then dive again?

Do you have an explanation?

Apollo 17 EVA's:

"Approximately 47 minutes later, the powered descent to the lunar surface began. Landing occurred at 7:54:57 p.m. Dec. 11, at lunar latitude 20 degrees, 10 minutes north, and longitude 30 degrees 46 minutes east. Apollo 17 was the last lunar landing mission. Three extravehicular activities, or EVAs, lasted a total of 22 hours, four minutes on the lunar surface.
- EVA No. 1 began at 11:54:49 p.m. Dec. 11, with Eugene Cernan egressing at 12:01 a.m. Dec. 12. The first EVA was seven hours, 12 minutes long and was completed at 7:06:42 a.m. Dec. 12.
- The second EVA began at 11:28:06 p.m. Dec. 12, and lasted seven hours, 37 minutes, ending at at 7:05:02 a.m. Dec. 13.
- The final EVA began at 10:25:48 p.m. Dec. 13, and ended at 5:40:56 a.m. Dec. 14.
"
So their tanks went from 4 hours to 8 hours?

Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #67 on: June 21, 2021, 01:39:28 AM »
Any idea how big the tanks were in those supposed LM's?
Any idea how much liquid oxygen they held?
Any idea how they kept them stable in supposed minus 250 to plus 250 supposed vacuum cold and heat?

Finally, I got where Scepty is pushing us. And I give him credit for that. Obviously, the astronauts have not been breathing pure oxygen. They have been breathing AIR. Air, that has permeated all the stuff in the LM, including the walls, and being extracted when needed. So, they didn't need any containers.

In addition, this way the denpressure is reduced and the liftoff from the lunar surface is much easier. Two problems solved at one go. Amirite?

*

Stash

  • 12439
  • I am car!
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #68 on: June 21, 2021, 01:47:09 AM »

What makes you think they would need to repressurise the LM to refill their packs?

(All supposed).

So how do they fill their back packs and add water and new batteries and such in the LM if it's open to the vacuum?
Do divers come out of water and hook up to a refill then dive again?

Do you have an explanation?

Apollo 17 EVA's:

"Approximately 47 minutes later, the powered descent to the lunar surface began. Landing occurred at 7:54:57 p.m. Dec. 11, at lunar latitude 20 degrees, 10 minutes north, and longitude 30 degrees 46 minutes east. Apollo 17 was the last lunar landing mission. Three extravehicular activities, or EVAs, lasted a total of 22 hours, four minutes on the lunar surface.
- EVA No. 1 began at 11:54:49 p.m. Dec. 11, with Eugene Cernan egressing at 12:01 a.m. Dec. 12. The first EVA was seven hours, 12 minutes long and was completed at 7:06:42 a.m. Dec. 12.
- The second EVA began at 11:28:06 p.m. Dec. 12, and lasted seven hours, 37 minutes, ending at at 7:05:02 a.m. Dec. 13.
- The final EVA began at 10:25:48 p.m. Dec. 13, and ended at 5:40:56 a.m. Dec. 14.
"
So their tanks went from 4 hours to 8 hours?

Read the document regarding the evolution of the PLSS that I posted earlier. It's all in there, tech specs, schematics, heating, cooling, O2, water, etc., with the technology evolution of the 7 iterations of the Apollo PLSS. That's the funny thing about technology/engineering, it keeps on advancing as time and efforts go on. Crazy, I know.
Yes Stash.

I am clearly the product of castrated machine learning.

You are quite obviously, human.

*

Mikey T.

  • 3416
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #69 on: June 21, 2021, 05:12:40 AM »

...Not only this but the entire time spent breathing in pure oxygen should've killed those men...


Finally, we are informed (from a very thrustworthy source) why so many people suffering from COVID 19 and treated with pure oxygen in hospitals around the world have died. We are yet to be informed why the others, treated in the same way, somehow survived.
A relative of mine was taking n pure oxygen. But guess what?
My relative was doing it through a tube up the nose, aided by the atmosphere.

So called astronauts are apparently on it for days and dys from Earth lift off all the way to the so called moon then back.

No issues were had because in fantasy world you can achieve anything.

It's not fantasy, it's actually science. A quick poke around and you'll find perfectly reasonable explanations as to how Oxygen and pressure work. Being that you're all about pressure, you should know this. Ask any scuba diver and they can explain this as well:

"The oxygen that astronauts breathe in space is at a lower pressure than air pressure on earth. Apparently it is the pressure that would cause the problem rather than the concentration. The same applies to some deep sea divers.

The thing about oxygen toxicity is that it's exposure to a high partial pressure of O2 that is dangerous, not a high percentage. Similarly, you need a minimum partial pressure, not a minimum percentage. If you breathe a very low percentage oxygen gas at a very high pressure, your body still gets the correct amount of oxygen. If you breathe a very high percentage of oxygen at a very low pressure, you again get the correct amount of oxygen.

Some spacecraft, and most spacesuits, operate on pure O2 at a lower pressure than sea level. Because the astronaut is breathing a low pressure gas, their total exposure to Oxygen is not at a dangerous level.
"
Of course you're going to get your oxygen...but, it's still dangerous and toxic in thats et up.

Any idea how Apollo 17 managed their oxy tank fills and depressurisations/repressurisations in the amount they needed?
Also whilst they're still doing this there's their spacesuits require the equalisation to the pressures because it all seems separate.

Any idea if they took off their space suits every time they entered the LM?
Various pressurized tubing.  Regulators, valves, tanks, and pumps are a thing.
Suits are contained environments, they have connections for external oxygen/water/etc when needed. 
Their suits, no, their EVA backpacks, yes.
Pure oxygen at 5 psi is not toxic to breath. 
Where is the problem?  I thought you were asking to understand and not to point out your own incredulity about things you do not understand.  I guess that was BS huh.

*

rvlvr

  • 2148
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #70 on: June 21, 2021, 07:59:21 AM »
Has scepti at any stage here provided a problem with actual numbers or something concrete? Is it always ”seems fishy to me” or ”don’t you think that is a bit odd, hmm”?

Seems the person lacks basic knowledge of basically anything to discuss it in detail with someone who knows even a tad.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2021, 08:02:13 AM by rvlvr »

*

JackBlack

  • 18611
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #71 on: June 21, 2021, 02:07:26 PM »
What makes you think they would need to repressurise the LM to refill their packs?
(All supposed).

So how do they fill their back packs and add water and new batteries and such in the LM if it's open to the vacuum?
Do divers come out of water and hook up to a refill then dive again?

Do you have an explanation?
And that supposition of yours is wrong.
Again, you are inventing problems where none exist, all so you can continue your irrational attack.

For the simplest option which you would already know if you approached this subject honestly; remember the first issue, of how the astronauts could breath with the LM depressurised? That could be applied here, using the LM for an oxygen supply while the PLSS is refilled. But even that isn't needed.

They are not simply carrying around air tanks, like scuba divers do. Instead they are carrying around a more complex system with built in regulators.
Again, if you were actually honest and paying attention to what has already been provided you would see in this post:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=88640.msg2323538#msg2323538 (which you clearly didn't pay attention to and instead just said thanks and asked a new question) that the PLSS has a point to connect it to the LM, BEFORE the regulator.
i.e. the LM can be connected to the tank in the PLSS to refill it while the PLSS continues to provide air for the astronaut.


Again, if you were honestly examining this, you would see no problem here.
But because you WANT there to be a problem, you make a bunch of suppositions to create problems where none exist.

You mean how ridiculous you and your pathetic dismissal is.
You're off again, aren't you?
Do you mean physically? If so, I didn't hang around for your answer.
If you mean mentally, no; like normally, that would be you, with your continued pathetic dismal and invention of problems to try to pretend everything that shows your fantasy is wrong is fantasy itself.
Again, don't just assert things are ridiculous, explain why. That sure seems to be something you struggle with.
If that means claiming something is too small, show it is too small by doing the math (I know, you hate it because it keeps showing you are wrong).

If you want to claim there is not enough oxygen, provide the math to prove it, along with a clear statement of anything that is assumed.

Of course you're going to get your oxygen...but, it's still dangerous and toxic in thats et up.
That still remains your baseless claim that you are yet to prove.
Stop just asserting the same blatant lie and either justify it or admit you have no basis to think it is a problem.

Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #72 on: June 21, 2021, 02:39:38 PM »
Has scepti at any stage here provided a problem with actual numbers or something concrete? Is it always ”seems fishy to me” or ”don’t you think that is a bit odd, hmm”?

Seems the person lacks basic knowledge of basically anything to discuss it in detail with someone who knows even a tad.



no
and he is yet to provide a circle and the value of the massive tilt.
so basic.
a circle and a triangle sceppy
let's have it!

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11801
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #73 on: June 22, 2021, 03:21:12 AM »
Skeppy, there is no way these brainwashed stooges and paid shills will ever not believe evverything NASA has told them. No matter how ridiculous the story, they just believe like little children. Of course there are so many problems with the whole story of traveling and living in a vacuum.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

*

JackBlack

  • 18611
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #74 on: June 22, 2021, 03:24:29 AM »
Skeppy, there is no way these brainwashed stooges and paid shills will ever not believe evverything NASA has told them. No matter how ridiculous the story, they just believe like little children. Of course there are so many problems with the whole story of traveling and living in a vacuum.
So many problems, yet you can't show any.
Try coming up with something less ridiculous, then we might believe you.
Until then, we aren't foolish enough to accept your irrational dismissal.

*

Mikey T.

  • 3416
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #75 on: June 22, 2021, 04:37:01 AM »
Skeppy, there is no way these brainwashed stooges and paid shills will ever not believe evverything NASA has told them. No matter how ridiculous the story, they just believe like little children. Of course there are so many problems with the whole story of traveling and living in a vacuum.
Another nuh uhh drive by.  Do you have anything, anything at all to add to the discussion?  What problems specifically?  Or is it all incredulity arising from your intentionally limited knowledge?

Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #76 on: June 22, 2021, 06:19:19 AM »
Skeppy, there is no way these brainwashed stooges and paid shills will ever not believe evverything NASA has told them. No matter how ridiculous the story, they just believe like little children. Of course there are so many problems with the whole story of traveling and living in a vacuum.

Wow.  It’s like an AI scanned a million YouTube flat earth comments in order to find the most clichéd generic response possible that says absolutely nothing.

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11801
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #77 on: June 22, 2021, 05:06:30 PM »
Skeppy, there is no way these brainwashed stooges and paid shills will ever not believe evverything NASA has told them. No matter how ridiculous the story, they just believe like little children. Of course there are so many problems with the whole story of traveling and living in a vacuum.

Wow.  It’s like an AI scanned a million YouTube flat earth comments in order to find the most clichéd generic response possible that says absolutely nothing.
Wrong, it says it all. Brainwashed stooges and paid shills will backup NASA fairy tales always.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

*

JJA

  • 6705
  • Math is math!
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #78 on: June 22, 2021, 05:27:18 PM »
Skeppy, there is no way these brainwashed stooges and paid shills will ever not believe evverything NASA has told them. No matter how ridiculous the story, they just believe like little children. Of course there are so many problems with the whole story of traveling and living in a vacuum.

Wow.  It’s like an AI scanned a million YouTube flat earth comments in order to find the most clichéd generic response possible that says absolutely nothing.
Wrong, it says it all. Brainwashed stooges and paid shills will backup NASA fairy tales always.

I wish I knew who to talk to so I could get my paycheck.

You ever actually SEE one of these supposed NASA paychecks for spreading 'fairy tales'? Or are you just brainwashed into believing it with zero evidence?

I've photographed the space station many times, and I'm very sure NASA didn't pay me to fake my own personal observations.  ::)

*

Mikey T.

  • 3416
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #79 on: June 22, 2021, 06:01:11 PM »
Skeppy, there is no way these brainwashed stooges and paid shills will ever not believe evverything NASA has told them. No matter how ridiculous the story, they just believe like little children. Of course there are so many problems with the whole story of traveling and living in a vacuum.

Wow.  It’s like an AI scanned a million YouTube flat earth comments in order to find the most clichéd generic response possible that says absolutely nothing.
Wrong, it says it all. Brainwashed stooges and paid shills will backup NASA fairy tales always.
Funny coming from the FE NPC who parrots FE scriptures pretty much exclusively now.  What happened to you, did you get tired of constantly getting shown to be so wrong that you now only come in from time to time to spout the same tired FE talking points?  The "woo hoo 1000 mph rotation is sooooooo fast guy" is back yet again guys, super. 

*

JackBlack

  • 18611
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #80 on: June 23, 2021, 02:42:10 AM »
Wrong, it says it all.
Yes it does, at least in the subtext.
FEers have no ability to rationally defend their claims, so they just resort to insults and ridicule; even so desperate that they need to lie and pretend anyone who doesn't accept their BS are paid shills.

If your position was actually based upon rational thought and evidence, you would try to justify it, rather than just insults those who don't buy your lies.

*

Timeisup

  • 3283
  • You still think that?
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #81 on: June 23, 2021, 05:05:00 AM »
Skeppy, there is no way these brainwashed stooges and paid shills will ever not believe evverything NASA has told them. No matter how ridiculous the story, they just believe like little children. Of course there are so many problems with the whole story of traveling and living in a vacuum.

Wow.  It’s like an AI scanned a million YouTube flat earth comments in order to find the most clichéd generic response possible that says absolutely nothing.
Wrong, it says it all. Brainwashed stooges and paid shills will backup NASA fairy tales always.

Who says that FE believers never resort to the good old cliche!
What a laugh!!!

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28515
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #82 on: June 24, 2021, 12:14:28 AM »
Any idea how big the tanks were in those supposed LM's?
Any idea how much liquid oxygen they held?
Any idea how they kept them stable in supposed minus 250 to plus 250 supposed vacuum cold and heat?

Finally, I got where Scepty is pushing us. And I give him credit for that. Obviously, the astronauts have not been breathing pure oxygen. They have been breathing AIR. Air, that has permeated all the stuff in the LM, including the walls, and being extracted when needed. So, they didn't need any containers.

In addition, this way the denpressure is reduced and the liftoff from the lunar surface is much easier. Two problems solved at one go. Amirite?

(All supposed).
So they're not breathing pure oxygen and are breathing normal air at one third norml Earth pressure?

How is this air managed from the lox tanks?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28515
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #83 on: June 24, 2021, 12:18:04 AM »


Read the document regarding the evolution of the PLSS that I posted earlier. It's all in there, tech specs, schematics, heating, cooling, O2, water, etc., with the technology evolution of the 7 iterations of the Apollo PLSS. That's the funny thing about technology/engineering, it keeps on advancing as time and efforts go on. Crazy, I know.
I have no issue with technology advancing.
I do have many issues with this moon stuff so I'm going to pose questions.
I'm well aware they will be answered. It's just a case of, how and why those answers come to be and whether they seem plausible.

You see I could ask how the starship enterprise works and some ardent fan of the sci-fi series would happily tell me everything they have read up on.

Do you see what I mean?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28515
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #84 on: June 24, 2021, 12:21:51 AM »

...Not only this but the entire time spent breathing in pure oxygen should've killed those men...


Finally, we are informed (from a very thrustworthy source) why so many people suffering from COVID 19 and treated with pure oxygen in hospitals around the world have died. We are yet to be informed why the others, treated in the same way, somehow survived.
A relative of mine was taking n pure oxygen. But guess what?
My relative was doing it through a tube up the nose, aided by the atmosphere.

So called astronauts are apparently on it for days and dys from Earth lift off all the way to the so called moon then back.

No issues were had because in fantasy world you can achieve anything.

It's not fantasy, it's actually science. A quick poke around and you'll find perfectly reasonable explanations as to how Oxygen and pressure work. Being that you're all about pressure, you should know this. Ask any scuba diver and they can explain this as well:

"The oxygen that astronauts breathe in space is at a lower pressure than air pressure on earth. Apparently it is the pressure that would cause the problem rather than the concentration. The same applies to some deep sea divers.

The thing about oxygen toxicity is that it's exposure to a high partial pressure of O2 that is dangerous, not a high percentage. Similarly, you need a minimum partial pressure, not a minimum percentage. If you breathe a very low percentage oxygen gas at a very high pressure, your body still gets the correct amount of oxygen. If you breathe a very high percentage of oxygen at a very low pressure, you again get the correct amount of oxygen.

Some spacecraft, and most spacesuits, operate on pure O2 at a lower pressure than sea level. Because the astronaut is breathing a low pressure gas, their total exposure to Oxygen is not at a dangerous level.
"
Of course you're going to get your oxygen...but, it's still dangerous and toxic in thats et up.

Any idea how Apollo 17 managed their oxy tank fills and depressurisations/repressurisations in the amount they needed?
Also whilst they're still doing this there's their spacesuits require the equalisation to the pressures because it all seems separate.

Any idea if they took off their space suits every time they entered the LM?
Various pressurized tubing.  Regulators, valves, tanks, and pumps are a thing.
Suits are contained environments, they have connections for external oxygen/water/etc when needed. 
Their suits, no, their EVA backpacks, yes.
Pure oxygen at 5 psi is not toxic to breath. 
Where is the problem?  I thought you were asking to understand and not to point out your own incredulity about things you do not understand.  I guess that was BS huh.
(All supposedly).

The 5 psi is a major major major problem on its own.

Are the back packs refilled with pure oxygen and refilled with water for their coolant?
Is the LM pure oxygen filled?

I have to keep asking the questions and see what answers you people come up with.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28515
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #85 on: June 24, 2021, 12:26:32 AM »

i.e. the LM can be connected to the tank in the PLSS to refill it while the PLSS continues to provide air for the astronaut.
Again, if you were honestly examining this, you would see no problem here.
But because you WANT there to be a problem, you make a bunch of suppositions to create problems where none exist.


(All supposed).

Ok, so the PLSS is refilled while they wear it.

Soooo, are the PLSS refilled externally from the LM?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28515
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #86 on: June 24, 2021, 12:28:35 AM »
Skeppy, there is no way these brainwashed stooges and paid shills will ever not believe evverything NASA has told them. No matter how ridiculous the story, they just believe like little children. Of course there are so many problems with the whole story of traveling and living in a vacuum.
I absolutely agree with you, 100%.
The thing is I do like to question and see the answers from each individual to see how they interpret everything.

I'm fully aware that it's a case of following a pied piper.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 28515
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #87 on: June 24, 2021, 12:31:01 AM »


I wish I knew who to talk to so I could get my paycheck.

You ever actually SEE one of these supposed NASA paychecks for spreading 'fairy tales'? Or are you just brainwashed into believing it with zero evidence?

I've photographed the space station many times, and I'm very sure NASA didn't pay me to fake my own personal observations.  ::)
You don't need a pay cheque. It's just a case of looking up official lines of reading when questions are asked, critically.
The answers are all there on a plate for you people. You simply follow them to the letter and have no reason to question.

I get that and I accept that.........but...like hoppy said......

*

JackBlack

  • 18611
Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #88 on: June 24, 2021, 01:38:07 AM »
(All supposed).
So they're not breathing pure oxygen and are breathing normal air at one third norml Earth pressure?

How is this air managed from the lox tanks?
You didn't detect his sarcasm?

I do have many issues with this moon stuff so I'm going to pose questions.
Yet you can't demonstrate a single actual issue with it.

Do you see what I mean?
Yes, as you can't show any genuine issue, you need to continually appeal to ridicule instead.

(All supposedly).
You mean you suppose there is a problem.
It is not all supposedly.

Again, if you want to pretend it is fake and never happened, PROVE IT!
Show an actual issue.
Otherwise, cut out all this "supposedly" BS.

The 5 psi is a major major major problem on its own.
And yet another baseless assertion from you.
Why is 5 psi a major problem?
Do you think it is too much or too little?
Can you articulate why you think it is a problem at all?
Or is it just another one of your blatant lies pretending there is a problem when there is none?

I have to keep asking the questions
Only because you can't actually show any problem.

(All supposed).

Ok, so the PLSS is refilled while they wear it.

Soooo, are the PLSS refilled externally from the LM?
Again, if you want to ask a question, stop saying it is all supposed, stop claiming its fake.
If you want to claim a problem, them demonstrate it.
It has been shown that your latest attempt at inventing a problem is pure nonsense.

Re: Airlocks in the supposed LM's.
« Reply #89 on: June 24, 2021, 03:13:16 AM »
Breathing pure oxygen?
Hahaha
Aside from the ship exploding, you would die from trying to breathe it.