If the earth were flat, it would be easy to make an accurate, fixed scale map on a flat sheet of paper.
It is impossible to make such a map because the earth is not flat.
There are a lot of rural unexplored areas and oceans where the differences occurs. What happens is that people simple measure the distance between cities and forcefully plot it on a round Earth, while distortions actually occurs on the rural areas and oceans, which is largely unexplored and very few people would notice inconsistencies. Meanwhile, as long as the sunrise is not too far away from the cited data, no one would notice. Let’s say the sunrise is 15 minutes off the true value in your city. Would anyone really notice it? Perhaps 30 minutes off? Even if a small number of people do notice, they will soon forget it after the sun rises.
Where exactly are these ‘unexplored areas’ you are referring to?
Sunrise and sunset times are absolutely accurate. If you own a smart phone the times are clearly given for whichever location you happen to be in.
The topic of maps have been discussed numerous times on this forum. Maps made since the late 1700 using accepted surveying methods were pretty accurate. Maps of France made during that period stand up pretty well even today. Maps made now using data from satellites are super accurate.
As I’ve often repeated there is no possibility of an accurate alternative flat earth ever being produced.
It’s complete nonsense to imagine that you could shuffle the continents around to fit with flat earth thinking. They are where they are and have been shown to be so, continental drift aside.
If our current maps are correct how on earth could there ever be an alternative set flat or otherwise.
It really staggers belief that people imagine that there are issues with our current maps given the 24/7 movement of countless numbers of various types of global transportation that relies on accurate navigation. If there were a problem with a continent not being where it marked I think someone may have noticed… don’t you?