Unless you can give me a scenario where there is no resistance to motion and show me how constant velocity can be achieved....you have nothing.
We could, but you would dismiss it as fake.
So how about you stick to the simple claims about your model instead, and then try to understand some basic mechanics after that?
And I'll say it again.
And you will be just as wrong each time you say it.
You do not need a force to keep something in motion.
Again, inertia is a resistance to change in motion, not to motion.
If inertia was simply resistance to motion, we would not need seat belts or breaks.
If you wanted to stop a car you would simply take your foot off the accelerator and the car, and all its occupants would immediately come to an abrupt stop.
The fact it does not shows that a force is not needed to continue motion.
The fact that in order to slow a car down at a decent rate you need to use brakes to apply a force, shows that a force is needed to bring something to a stop when it is in motion.
The fact that when you do so, the occupants and objects (excluding those lower in density than the air in the vehicle) appear to move forwards relative to the vehicle, unless something (like a seatbelt) restrains them and applies a force to slow them down, again shows that you need a force to stop motion.
There is no magical resistance to motion. Instead you have resistance to changes in motion.
The closest you get to resistance to motion is in things like air resistance, which resist relative motion.
One thing they do prove is there isn't a globe or spin.
You sure do love to spout the same pathetic lies again and again.
Care to explain just why you repeat this lie?
Can you justify your claim at all?
Or can you only just continually claim things refute the globe and the fact that it spins?
And while you are at it, answer the simple questions which destroy the garbage you continually preach:
Again, by what magic does your magical air magically maintain a magical pressure gradient?
By what magic does this magical air of yours magically make the pressure gradient proportional to weight of the fluid?
By what magic does this magical air magically stop the magical high pressure region from decompressing and pushing up the low pressure region above?
By what magic does the magical low pressure air above magically push down an object into a much greater force/resistance of the magical high pressure below?
By what magic does this magical air then magically decide to magically push up some objects instead of magically pushing them down?
By what magic does the air push things down and then resist that downwards motion so differently?
You're not really saying anything, are you.
There you go projecting your own inadequacies again.