I accept it's difficult for people to grasp my set up and thoughts.
I find it fairly easy, and just realise it is wrong.
Not by what I see, you don't.
Of course you don't, because you don't want to see that you are wrong, so anyone who shows you are wrong you need to dismiss as indoctrinated and unable to grasp your thoughts.
But your inability and refusal to address simple questions show this is not the case.
Again, can you explain how the polarity of magnets work, including how 2 attractive vortexes manage to repel one another in complete defiance of all basic logic?
If not, can you explain any of the countless issues that have been brought up with your nonsense?
If not, stop pretending we don't grasp your claims.
Again, can you explain something simple like the polarity of magnets?
Or do I fully grasp your "set up and thoughts" and correctly realise that your "explanation" does not work to explain magnets because it predicts results which are contradicted by reality?
My stance is primarily against the severe indoctrination I got and grew up with
Yet rather than try to learn about it and find the evidence for it, you just dismiss it all as nonsenes.
However, I had the time to question it all in the last 15 years or so and I quite quickly came to the realisation that it is absolute utter nonsense in the absolute extreme.
A claim you continually assert, yet you are completely incapable of justifying.
I've gave simple reasons and they are rejected by people who decide it's better to try and ridicule me rather than take their time to understand alternate theories/musings.
There you go projecting again.
You have been provided with simple reasons and they are rejected/dismissed by you, with those putting them forwards ridiculed by you as you have no actual refutation for them.
You have put forward plenty of claims, but those claims have been refuted.
The bigger question is, why would people spend all their time wanting to have a dig and push a global model with a nutcase like me for years on end?
Because they care about reality and object to people spouting pure BS about it.
This means they object to you continually spouting BS about the RE.
They explain what is wrong with your arguments and sometimes even provide evidence clearly showing that you are wrong, only for you to dismiss it as a con-job.
All it takes for stupidity to triumph is for intelligent to remain silent.
If you are genuine and want to try and understand the simplicity of it from my side, you're welcome to ask me anything you like. I'll try and explain
Until you get to the point where it is clear your "explanations" don't match reality, at which point you will do whatever you can to dodge, even extremely simple questions which clearly show you are wrong.
it can be done without distractions which most who argue with me, are full of.
You are the one continually providing distractions from your complete inability to explain anything.
A recent example is how I pointed out how based your claims of how magnets working, you would need 2 vacuum cleaners to repel one another.
Rather than address that issue, you deflected by bringing in a distraction of 2 hair dryers.
That is because with that distraction you can easily pretend your explanation works, but without it, focusing on the actual situation presented, you have no way to explain how your "explanation" matches reality, because it simply doesn't.
Likewise, in a thread asking about seeing things with your naked eye, and entire FOV, you attempt to bring in a massive distraction of a magical level tube which limits your FOV to 0.
Or one from a while ago, when asked to explain how the air pushes an object down, regardless of if it is against a wall, a ceiling or in mid air, but in all cases not on the ground, you instead try explaining how an object sitting on the ground is pushed down.
So no, you are the one full of distractions, not us.
You need these distractions to pretend you are correct.
Without them, all your claims fall apart.
I honestly think people need to as well by pushing aside the global concept and trying to see the alternatives.
Again, the global has nothing to do with what is wrong with your model and claims. We do not need Earth to be a globe, or anything like that to show you are wrong.
Let's look at a car battery.
The battery holds a charge...right?
It will keep hold of a charge as long as it's being fed. Basically in a car the battery discharges and feeds the car parts, including the alternator/dynamo or whatever you want to call it..and back to the battery again. A loop.
A drain. But what comes out must be replaced, equally. A cycle.
No, not really.
The battery has a charge, in the sense of electrochemical potential energy.
But if left doing nothing it will not have that charge.
When you start the car, the battery feeds the starter motor, causing the engine to start.
The engine now runs by itself, using fuel and oxygen to continue rotating.
This rotation is transferred to an alternator to generate electricity which then feeds back to the battery.
It is not a cycle like you claim. What comes out is not necessarily replaced.
If you would like an even better example, consider an electric car.
Now the battery simply feeds an electric motor, causing the battery to discharge as you drive it.
It only starts filling back up with charge when you plug it in to charge.
You need an external power source to drive the loop.
Unless you were referrring to the individual electrons, in which case they happily flow through, losing energy in the process, and thus the flow stops, again needing an external power source to keep it going.
What replacing the engine and fuel in your battery.
Pressure equalisation.
That would stop the motion, not keep it going.
- What if I put a magnet in low pressure vacuum, does it de-magnetize?
If the low pressure was sufficient, yes.
In other words, do magnets work in a vacuum?
No.
Just how low a pressure do you need?
Do you have any evidence of this at all?
(I ask if you have evidence because you have made it clear that you are unwilling to accept evidence from anyone, so asking us for evidence is an exercise is dishonesty, and us providing any evidence to show you are wrong is an exercise in futility as you will simply dismiss it as a conjob.)