I leave that down to those that are willing to spend the time questioning everything and scrutinising everything, to come up with their own logic and reasoning rather than being saturated in a lot of unprovable so called scientific gobbledygook.
The problem is your claims are that "lot of unprovable so called scientific gobbledygook".
When people with an open mind honestly and logically scrutinise your claims, they realise they are pure BS.
For example, you claim that inertia is caused by air even though you admit you cannot explain it with air at all.
So why would any sane person accept that completely unsubstantiated lie, which you make just so you pretend rockets can't work in space and thus all the satellite photos of Earth showing it is clearly round must be fake?
What a sane person would do is realise you are just looking for whatever dishonest excuse you can come up with to dismiss the RE and the evidence supporting it.
Likewise, why would any sane person accept your denpressure BS when you can't even explain why an object falls, directly defying the pressure gradient of the atmosphere, or why there is a pressure gradient in the first place?
It would be absolutely correct if I was putting it all out as factual.
You repeatedly put out your claims as factual.
Especially with your irrational, hate fuelled attack on the RE and mainstream science, repeatedly dismissing it as nonsense and accusing anyone who supports it of being indoctrinated and only supporting it because of that indoctrination.
Denpressure easily caters for plane flight
With no ability to explain why things fall, and instead having a pressure gradient push things up, denpressure, if it were real, would make flight trivial.
But back in reality, gravity explains why objects fall and thus why planes need such large wings to generate lift to overcome gravity to be able to fly.
Again, denpressure explains nothing.
It is blindingly obvious.
It is blindingly obvious that it is delusional BS.
That is obvious from your complete inability to explain anything with it.
For anything to fall, first it must be forced up by energy to then become the potential energy after that force is spent.
Think about it.
Perhaps you should try to actually think for once.
You can just remove the support and have it fall.
There is no need to lift it first.
is then crushed down
But WHY DOES IT MAGICALLY GO DOWN?
That is what you are completely incapable of explaining.
We know the pressure is greater below the apple, and that means the air should push it up.
Why does the apple never go upwards or even to the side?
The same reason it doesn't in water.
Apples float in water, for the exact same reason the air should be pushing the apple up.
Also there is no such thing as pull. Only push.
That alone kills gravity.
No, that alone is your baseless assertion you cannot justify at all and instead need to continually flee from simple questions showing it is BS.
Again, how does a chain or a rope transfer the force?
Again, remember this diagram, it shows your claims are pure BS:
Have you figured out how the right side of the chain pushes the left side to the right, even though it is on the wrong side to do that?
I'll give you a clue, it pulls it.
In reality what you typically have are fields which interact with particles and at that level there is no distinction between push and pull.
It depends how far you want to go. Do we go down the "how long is a piece of string" avenue?
How about until you get down to a fundamental force, like gravity or electromagnetism.
Also there is no such thing as pull. Only push.
Really? How does a car get a caravan to move then? How does a tractor get a plough to move? Do train engines not pull the carriages along?
They all push each other along. You just need to put your unbiased mind to work, as above..
The car is in front. It can't push the caravan. It can only pull it.
You just need to discard your extreme bias and stop rejecting reality.
The easiest proof's have already been told but naturally, denied....obviously.
You mean refuted. That is fundamentally different to denied.
An example of denial is where you dismissed the photographic evidence as fake.
An example of refuted is an explanation of how long distance photos clearly show the surface of water is curved, not flat like you want to pretend.
Now again, figured out how to explain the pressure gradient without appealing to gravity yet?