The only one spouting nonsense here is you.
Then don't bother with me. Blank me.
Again, I care about the truth and thus will object to your nonsense.
If you want me to stop then either stop spouting nonsense or justify it.
I have repeatedly explained why your nonsense is wrong, and you just continue to ignore it because you want to pretend it is correct to pretend all of science is wrong.
Once more, you have accepted that there is no significant difference in the exterior volume of the object. You did this by admitting the amount of water displaced is negligible.
This means for the air outside the object, there is no significant difference in the amount of air displaced by moving/accelerating the object.
This means the sole difference in amount of air displaced will come from the air inside the object, and a hollow object with air inside demands that more air is displaced when you move the object, and you even admitted this.
This means that according to your nonsense by displacing more air, you get less resistance. That is the nonsense you need to justify (and then justify the exact contradiction due to larger objects).
Conversely, inertia, where it requires a force to accelerate a mass with that force proportional to the mass, works just fine.