When you attempt to show you understand one little bit, I'll re-engage with you.
He has demonstrated he is attempting to understand.
By "attempt to show you understand" do you actually mean "accept whatever BS you say without question"?
Because if so, that isn't understanding. That is just you attempting to indoctrinate people.
His argument is quite simple and shows a significant understanding of your BS.
You are claiming you are pushed down by the air pushing you down.
The only place it can do that, is the top of you. That means the air needs to push down with for your entire weight. And that would crush your hair.
We're all massively indoctrinated. Stop taking it as a personal attack. I include myself in this.
No, we aren't.
You being indoctrinated and wanting to indoctrinate others doesn't magically mean everyone is.
It IS a personal attack, which you repeatedly use to insult and dismiss anyone who refutes your BS, to pretend the globe has no explanation for anything.
It has no place in any rational discussion.
Obviously you just want to deny you have a sense for motion.
This is why it's difficult to answer your posts.
Yes, it is quite difficult to answer posts which discuss reality while you keep rejecting reality.
I wouldn't call it denial. Instead it is an understanding of what your body feels combined with plenty of personal experience.
When I am in a car or a bus or a train or a plane, travelling along at decent speeds, I don't feel that motion, BECAUSE PEOPLE DO NOT FEEL MOTION!
Instead, what is felt is a force being transmitted through your body.
For example, if the car accelerates, or turns, I feel that, as it applies a force to one region of my body and my body then transfers it to the rest of my body.
So if all you can do is just outright deny reality to pretend to have a case, you really should just leave it at that and stop posting, as it means you can't justify your lies at all.
Walking around with a globe and turning yourself as you do, is nonsensical. It does not show anything real because it means you are manipulating the globe and space when there is no way to realistically make that work.
Good job refuting yourself.
Notice how on the right side, the top is pointing to the right, away from the sun which is to the left?
None of it is tilted to the right or left, it's tilted away at the top and towards at the bottom...and that's it.
So you are back to ignoring what simple and obvious diagrams show?
Here is a better diagram for you:
Notice how the top is always pointing to the right of the diagram?
Notice how the bottom is always pointing to the left?
So when it is on the left, the top points to the sun and the bottom points away from it.
And when it is on the right, the top points away from the sun and the bottom points towards it.
Again, the pole doesn't change direction, the relative direction to the sun does, and that changes if the pole is pointing towards or away from the sun.
Doesn't take a genius to see it.
But it takes wilful ignorance to ignore it to pretend the RE model doesn't work.
What your delusional claims require is for the actual orientation of the axis to change, defying the conservation of angular momentum, such that the top points to the right when to the right of the sun and to the left when to the left of the sun.
And that is pure nonsense.
And of course, you yet again ignore so much that you can't explain.
Your vortex in no way helps to explain magnetism.
Care to address any of the massive flaws with that?
Or will you just ignore them like you ignore so much that shows you are wrong?
The magnets absorb atmosphere like a funnel and as long as there is a way out it creates a high to low pressure difference.
And what magic causes that?
And why does this only effect magnetic materials?
Your bottle example shows the actual effect of the air, where even non-magnetic materials are affected.
Another big issue is that this requires a flow of air, when even air being pushed away from the magnet still manages to attract a magnetic object.
Likewise, another big issue is how 2 magnets interact, where you need 2 of these funnels to repel. Try that with 2 vacuum cleaners. Bring their nozzles together and see if they are repelled or if they get "attracted" to one another.
It is pure nonsense.
If this was the case a magnet would have 2 poles, with 1 pole attracting all materials, and the other repelling all materials.
It doesn't take a genius to see that your claims are pure nonsense with no hope of actually explaining magnets.
But of course, like you so often do, I assume you will just ignore this yet again as you can't explain it and don't want to admit you are wrong.