From what I understand, Andrew Kaufman was a psychiatrist that went into some ofther field of medicine after watching drugs being pushed to hard by many in the industry. He has been a vocal opponent (mybe not the right word) to many of the policies being rushed about the virus.
Many of you may have different views, I have no dount spent less time looking into this as some of you. But i think what he says, what i have heard, is pretty solid.
He discussed in other vids about how the PCR test was based on and compares to the lung fluid of a handful of chinese people suffering repsiratory illness - the genetic material, he reports was collected indiscrimately and the virus was not isolated for this test. The genetic materials would have contained alot of common elements like pneumonia and cancer to register positive on the PCR test. He also mentioned how in virology their is a process backwardly called Virus isolation in which the virus is not actually isolated(...?). I have tried to find info to counter this with out result. It's all like emblems of the local college football team next to the picture of the virus bal - level stuff...my preliminary investigation. Pailing in comparison to the apparent real scientific data he is citing publically.
Edit: i may be off on these details - but the jist of it makes sense to me and fills in blanks that aren't otherwise gettin filled...
Today i checked into another of his vids and they (his colleague and company) were talking about using microscope to view live tissues - which is not the norm in medicine. They were talking about observing living blood from which somatids/protids - a normal component of blood - they turned into many forms and back into somatids - one of the forms was streptococus bacteria, another was a fungal form. He also mentioned that he was spretty sure, though couldn't prove it that someof what is interpretted as virus' under the microscope was actually a form of somatid.
This is information that goes back to Royal Raymond Reiff and his compound microscope that had - if i remember correctly - 3 times (or more) as many parts as a normal microscope. This microscope used (light wave?) resonance, but i think more importantly a prsim to illuminate different stuctures in living samples. Further more this microscope had magnification so powerful it broke the known laws of optics. He was i think the first to discover pleiomorphism - the changing of form from bacteria to fungi to ..... to other so called micro organisms - very interesting stuff.