I'm starting to think Trump struggles with basic arithmetic. As far as I can tell if we took at face value every specific allegation of voter fraud he still wouldn't have enough to win the election.
Incorrect.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/
If we take this at face value, there is enough voter fraud here to flip PA, VA, GA, and close to a tie in NY.
This is the worst high-school level conspiracy theorist website blog you have posted so far. How can you even post that with a straight face? You taking this at face value only indicates your inability to notice when your being fed garbage.
Call us back when any of that garbage actually makes it in front of a judge. Not going to happen.
Just like Trump's reelection didn't happen. Just like the Storm didn't happen. Just like Trump staying in the White House isn't going to happen.
For starters, this isn't 'official government data' it's what the NY Times is sending browsers to display their fancy charts and graphs. I posted some of those graphs here during the counting.
This guy is looking at a newspapers heavily processed numbers and trying to prove some kind of voter fraud because it rounds numbers to a few decimal places and he's freaking out because he can't figure out how counting works.
This is Tom's "evidence".
{
"vote_shares": {
"trumpd": 0.566,
"bidenj": 0.42
},
"votes": 2984468,
"eevp": 42,
"eevp_source": "edison",
"timestamp": "2020-11-04T04:07:43Z"
},
{
"vote_shares": {
"trumpd": 0.56,
"bidenj": 0.426
},
"votes": 2984522,
"eevp": 42,
"eevp_source": "edison",
"timestamp": "2020-11-04T04:08:51Z"
},
So the problem seems to be the percentage changes 'too much' for this guy to handle based on the numbers displayed. He comes to this crackpot theory with no idea how these numbers are being processed internally, and jumps to the conclusion that because a newspaper rounds percentages on his web browser when it draws those fancy red and blue lines, that means the actual votes are being changed.
Let me repeat, this is data used to create the little voting graphs displayed on the web page. That's what this data is. This is not raw voting data direct from the government, it's drawing little graphs with a very small amount of precision.
Do you understand numerical precision Tom? Lets add that one to the list.
This is so much nothing, but yet again Tom brings the fun. You need to lay off the 4chan level websites, dude.
TLDR; Tom thinks actual votes are being changed because a newspaper web page is drawing graphs with limited precision.
LOL. The ignorance never ends.