What the hell is an ice wall?

Too bad it's an image that isn't being used as evidence.  Photographic evidence can't be used; images that are used to convey ideas can be used.

Um, yeah it is. I said Antarctica doesn't go all the way around the world, you said yes it does, with that picture as proof.

Because, that theory is illogical; The Earth is filled with twinkies, then volcanoes would spew twinkies everywhere, instead of hot, molten rock.  If this theory were true, then Pompeii wouldn't have been destroyed in the fashion that it did.

Your theory is illogical. It's all fake, it's a bunch of computers everywhere, showing you images of lava, that don't exist. That's part of the conspiracy, Pompeii doesn't exist, any "proof" you find is obviously made up by the government.

Or you could read it.  Don't blame me for your laziness.

You know I won't read it when you could sum it up for me right here, because all FE'ers seem to be on the same page around here.

Too bad it didn't say anything about the object being only of two dimensions.  You lose.

Haha, you're embarrassed just like the government is, as you claim. Horizontal, no tilt, that's flat buddy, it's ok to be wrong, you're already a FE'er.

Really?  Because, if you were to take a survey asking people what the first thing that came to mind when they hear "UFO", I'd bet about 60-80% would say "aliens" or something similar.

Then 60-80% of people are mislead, or simply retarded. Just because you're one of the 60-80% of retards doesn't make it right.

Well, MY point was that pictures can be faked, and you might not have the expertise to know when an image is faked and when it isn't.  Hence why no photographs can be used as evidence.

Um, I just showed you how to figure it out, for me it was common sense, it must be harder for you, but all of your pictures were pretty easily ID'd as fake.

This directly shows your reading ability, or lack thereof.

This directly shows your ability not to respond to one of my comments.

How am I supposed to believe you when you say that you've seen it?  Am I going to have to "take your word for it"?

Yes, I've been in 2nd grade, and saw a globe, I suppose you will have to take my word for it, as hard as it may be.

I don't believe I was being humorous.

No, you weren't humorous, but you were trying to be.

Quote from: "Minimalist"

What I don't get is FE'ers just basing today's knowledge on Passed-Thesis. Everytime it's "read this, read that, look this up, he said she said..."

I believe most FE'ers refer people to different sources because they were asked to provide a source, or are just plain sick of answering these same questions a few times a week because people join up and dont bother searching to see if someone was as much of a genius as them to have suggested the idea before...

But then why not, copy and paste what they've said before, put it into Microsoft word, and then copy and paste it back on here, if it's so hard to talk about the same stuff?

yes, because im sure that IQ and Typos are so strongly linked.
the very fact you fail to understand simple logic shows that your own ability to think means that it is hardly worth me talking to you.

if the best argument you can create involves a personal attack on someone, it generaly shows a lack of arguementive ability, and lowers an arguemnts impact. Try to read some work on Critical Thinking to understand a basic argument structure.

sorry to lower myself to your level, but i hope it gives the best chance of you understanding me. anyway... what were we talking about?

Well, you basically get a smart award for winning a spelling bee.
Yeah, you kind of missed the entire point in that post, but you tried

Quote from: "BOGWarrior89"

Too bad it's an image that isn't being used as evidence.  Photographic evidence can't be used; images that are used to convey ideas can be used.

Um, yeah it is. I said Antarctica doesn't go all the way around the world, you said yes it does, with that picture as proof.

No, I used it to show you what I mean.  I didn't offer it as proof, fool.

Quote from: "DFM"

Because, that theory is illogical; The Earth is filled with twinkies, then volcanoes would spew twinkies everywhere, instead of hot, molten rock.  If this theory were true, then Pompeii wouldn't have been destroyed in the fashion that it did.

Your theory is illogical. It's all fake, it's a bunch of computers everywhere, showing you images of lava, that don't exist. That's part of the conspiracy, Pompeii doesn't exist, any "proof" you find is obviously made up by the government.

The Earth is filled with twinkies, then volcanoes would spew twinkies everywhere, instead of hot, molten rock.

Quote from: "DFM"

Or you could read it.  Don't blame me for your laziness.

You know I won't read it when you could sum it up for me right here, because all FE'ers seem to be on the same page around here.

Hey, if I took the time to read and understand it, then you can too!

Quote from: "DFM"

Too bad it didn't say anything about the object being only of two dimensions.  You lose.

Haha, you're embarrassed just like the government is, as you claim. Horizontal, no tilt, that's flat buddy, it's ok to be wrong, you're already a FE'er.

It says nothing about being only two-dimensional; a cube (which is a three-dimensional geometric object made up of two-dimensional squares)  is flat, but it's three-dimensional; it looks like you are wrong.

Quote from: "DFM"

Really?  Because, if you were to take a survey asking people what the first thing that came to mind when they hear "UFO", I'd bet about 60-80% would say "aliens" or something similar.

Then 60-80% of people are mislead, or simply retarded. Just because you're one of the 60-80% of retards doesn't make it right.

Although U.F.O. stands for "Unidentified Flying Object", it also includes alien starships.  The picture was obviously an "alien starship".  You lose.

Quote from: "DFM"

Well, MY point was that pictures can be faked, and you might not have the expertise to know when an image is faked and when it isn't.  Hence why no photographs can be used as evidence.

Um, I just showed you how to figure it out, for me it was common sense, it must be harder for you, but all of your pictures were pretty easily ID'd as fake.

Too bad it's a matter of opinion.

Quote from: "DFM"

How am I supposed to believe you when you say that you've seen it?  Am I going to have to "take your word for it"?

Yes, I've been in 2nd grade, and saw a globe, I suppose you will have to take my word for it, as hard as it may be.

Yes, because a model proves everything.  As a matter of fact, I hav a model of New York that's in the process of being destroyed by Godzilla and King Ghidorah - someone should warn the citizens of New York that this is bound to happen!  They must evacuate quickly!

Quote from: "DFM"

I don't believe I was being humorous.

No, you weren't humorous, but you were trying to be.

Didn't you say that humor is relative?  That one person may find something funny and another may not?  Plus, how do you know that I was trying to be funny?  Where's your proof?

Quote from: "Rick_James"

Quote from: "Minimalist"

What I don't get is FE'ers just basing today's knowledge on Passed-Thesis. Everytime it's "read this, read that, look this up, he said she said..."

I believe most FE'ers refer people to different sources because they were asked to provide a source, or are just plain sick of answering these same questions a few times a week because people join up and dont bother searching to see if someone was as much of a genius as them to have suggested the idea before...

But then why not, copy and paste what they've said before, put it into Microsoft word, and then copy and paste it back on here, if it's so hard to talk about the same stuff?

Or, new people could do a simple search, find the Society's stance on a particular topic, and then we wouldn't have to spend 5 pages of every thread, all either called FE sun or speed of light or what about ships on horizons, and we could continue the discussions from where EVERYONE ELSE ON THE FORUM was up to, and not the latest person to walk through the door...

No, I used it to show you what I mean.  I didn't offer it as proof, fool.

That hurt my appendix

Quote from: "I"

The Earth is filled with twinkies, then volcanoes would spew twinkies everywhere, instead of hot, molten rock.

No, volcanic erruptions are fake!! Don't beleive that stuff, the government does that just to make you too afraid to ever go near a volcano, when really they're harmless, the government sure has fooled you

Hey, if I took the time to read and understand it, then you can too!

Can, of course I can, but I may not ; I'm not going to, whether you did, whether some other FE'ers or RE'ers did, or anyone, I'm not going to, when I have you here to sum it up for me. It's like solving a complex problem in math, by hand, when I have a calculator, right there, there's no point in not using it, see what I mean.

It says nothing about being only two-dimensional; a cube (which is a three-dimensional geometric object made up of two-dimensional squares)  is flat, but it's three-dimensional; it looks like you are wrong.

No, it has flat sides, but it's not flat. It appears as though you could be the one who is wrong in this case.

Although U.F.O. stands for "Unidentified Flying Object", it also includes alien starships.  The picture was obviously an "alien starship".  You lose.

Um, well unidentified flying object could stand for an alien starship, a bomber from Zimbabwe, an airborne cow, etc......, it's a very vague, ok, so I don't lose.

Too bad it's a matter of opinion.

Yeah, so are a lot of things that are obvious. For me it's obvious that the Colts won the Super Bowl last night, but for some, a Canadian with no TV, it's very hard to make that assumption, so it's a matter of opinion, sure.

Yes, because a model proves everything.  As a matter of fact, I hav a model of New York that's in the process of being destroyed by Godzilla and King Ghidorah - someone should warn the citizens of New York that this is bound to happen!  They must evacuate quickly!

No, I said I've seen a globe, which just happened to be a globe on a desk, in 2nd grade. Besides sometimes models do show real stuff, right now I have a model of Tiger Stadium, a football stadium in Baton Rouge that the LSU Tigers (see my avatar) play football in, and it's exact to the smallest detail, however, me punching it, and throwing it at the wall, doesn't mean that will happen to it, ok?

Didn't you say that humor is relative?  That one person may find something funny and another may not?  Plus, how do you know that I was trying to be funny?  Where's your proof?

Oh, you're giving me too much credit, for it wasn't I that said humor was relative, it was Einstein. Haven't you ever heard of Einstein's theory of relativity? Shortly followed by his Theory of the relativeness of humor?

Quote from: "LSUTiger1712"

Quote from: "Rick_James"

Quote from: "Minimalist"

What I don't get is FE'ers just basing today's knowledge on Passed-Thesis. Everytime it's "read this, read that, look this up, he said she said..."

I believe most FE'ers refer people to different sources because they were asked to provide a source, or are just plain sick of answering these same questions a few times a week because people join up and dont bother searching to see if someone was as much of a genius as them to have suggested the idea before...

But then why not, copy and paste what they've said before, put it into Microsoft word, and then copy and paste it back on here, if it's so hard to talk about the same stuff?

Or, new people could do a simple search, find the Society's stance on a particular topic, and then we wouldn't have to spend 5 pages of every thread, all either called FE sun or speed of light or what about ships on horizons, and we could continue the discussions from where EVERYONE ELSE ON THE FORUM was up to, and not the latest person to walk through the door...

Well, now that I've given you the idea, you could do it right now, go back and copy and paste what was said before and put it on Microsoft word, then you won't have to worry about incompetent newbs (noobs) asking stuff that you've already said, it saves everyone the "hard work" of looking stuff up, except you, but that's what the minimize button's for.

Well, now that I've given you the idea, you could do it right now, go back and copy and paste what was said before and put it on Microsoft word, then you won't have to worry about incompetent newbs (noobs) asking stuff that you've already said, it saves everyone the "hard work" of looking stuff up, except you, but that's what the minimize button's for.

I'm sure when everyone gets some free time (mods can help if you want guys) the FAQ will be updated again. Unfortunately, we actually have lives away from here, so it's perhaps not as as you may expect. Until then, you're unfortunately going to have to put in a bit of effort yourself and use the search function and existing FAQ.

Quote from: "LSUTiger1712"

Well, now that I've given you the idea, you could do it right now, go back and copy and paste what was said before and put it on Microsoft word, then you won't have to worry about incompetent newbs (noobs) asking stuff that you've already said, it saves everyone the "hard work" of looking stuff up, except you, but that's what the minimize button's for.

I'm sure when everyone gets some free time (mods can help if you want guys) the FAQ will be updated again. Unfortunately, we actually have lives away from here, so it's perhaps not as as you may expect. Until then, you're unfortunately going to have to put in a bit of effort yourself and use the search function and existing FAQ.

I think you overestimate the powers of a wondering newb (noob).

hot!
http://jessica-simpson-porn-movies.info/movies/avi/78435
regards, Sexybitch

Quote from: "BOG"

The Earth is filled with twinkies, then volcanoes would spew twinkies everywhere, instead of hot, molten rock.

No, volcanic eruptions are fake!! Don't beleive that stuff, the government does that just to make you too afraid to ever go near a volcano, when really they're harmless, the government sure has fooled you

Too bad I've seen one; by the way, what of all the footage?  How do they replicate that?

Quote from: "BOG"

Hey, if I took the time to read and understand it, then you can too!

Can, of course I can, but I may not ; I'm not going to, whether you did, whether some other FE'ers or RE'ers did, or anyone, I'm not going to, when I have you here to sum it up for me. It's like solving a complex problem in math, by hand, when I have a calculator, right there, there's no point in not using it, see what I mean.

So, I'm supposed to do your work for you?  Don't think so

Quote from: "BOG"

It says nothing about being only two-dimensional; a cube (which is a three-dimensional geometric object made up of two-dimensional squares)  is flat, but it's three-dimensional; it looks like you are wrong.

No, it has flat sides, but it's not flat. It appears as though you could be the one who is wrong in this case.

It is flat; it's a flat cube, as opposed to a rounded/concave/convex cube.

Quote from: "BOG"

Although U.F.O. stands for "Unidentified Flying Object", it also includes alien starships.  The picture was obviously an "alien starship".  You lose.

Um, well unidentified flying object could stand for an alien starship, a bomber from Zimbabwe, an airborne cow, etc......, it's a very vague, ok, so I don't lose.

Yes, but by looking at the image, you should be able to notice that I meant for "UFO" to equal "alien starship".

Quote from: "BOG"

Too bad it's a matter of opinion.

Yeah, so are a lot of things that are obvious. For me it's obvious that the Colts won the Super Bowl last night, but for some, a Canadian with no TV, it's very hard to make that assumption, so it's a matter of opinion, sure.

Gut instincts/intuition can be wrong.  Think quantum-mechanically.

Quote from: "BOG"

Yes, because a model proves everything.  As a matter of fact, I hav a model of New York that's in the process of being destroyed by Godzilla and King Ghidorah - someone should warn the citizens of New York that this is bound to happen!  They must evacuate quickly!

No, I said I've seen a globe, which just happened to be a globe on a desk, in 2nd grade. Besides sometimes models do show real stuff, right now I have a model of Tiger Stadium, a football stadium in Baton Rouge that the LSU Tigers (see my avatar) play football in, and it's exact to the smallest detail, however, me punching it, and throwing it at the wall, doesn't mean that will happen to it, ok?

Swing again; you missed the point.  My point was that having a model is not proof of anything; you actually have to have experimental evidence to prove something.

Quote from: "BOG"

Didn't you say that humor is relative?  That one person may find something funny and another may not?  Plus, how do you know that I was trying to be funny?  Where's your proof?

Oh, you're giving me too much credit, for it wasn't I that said humor was relative, it was Einstein. Haven't you ever heard of Einstein's theory of relativity? Shortly followed by his Theory of the relativeness of humor?

1)  I know the mechanics of Special Relativity and I know of General Relativity, so, yes, I've "heard of it".
2)  I didn't realize the relativity of time (time dilation) and length (length contraction) had to do with the relativity of humor.

Too bad I've seen one; by the way, what of all the footage?  How do they replicate that?

And it was fake, well using all the government technology that we simple folk don't know about, duh.

So, I'm supposed to do your work for you?  Don't think so

So, I'm supposded to do my work for me, don't think so.

It is flat; it's a flat cube, as opposed to a rounded/concave/convex cube.

Can't have a flat cube, a cube can have flat sides, but it itself can't be flat.

Yes, but by looking at the image, you should be able to notice that I meant for "UFO" to equal "alien starship".

No, I should be able to tell nothing, except that it's an UFO, because it's unidentified as far as I know, and it's flying, and it's an object. It could be some toy a young little lad in West Massachussets bought, and it goes real high, who am I to say :?

Gut instincts/intuition can be wrong.  Think quantum-mechanically.

How about I think logically, that way it's easy, and I understand what I'm doing.

Swing again; you missed the point.  My point was that having a model is not proof of anything; you actually have to have experimental evidence to prove something.

Yeah, well in that I was just making fun of you for saying that you were destroying it, therefore making it true, which isn't true.

I didn't say that the model itself made the earth round, however what I did say was that the model clearly shows, every single time, that the earth has a tilt to it. Why would the government make the earth round, when it's really flat :lol: , and have a tilt to it, why not just a perfect sphere? Makes no sense, who would go that in depth about it, right down to saying that the north pole and the north magnetic pole aren't even the same, they're quite the distance from each other.

1)  I know the mechanics of Special Relativity and I know of General Relativity, so, yes, I've "heard of it".
2)  I didn't realize the relativity of time (time dilation) and length (length contraction) had to do with the relativity of humor.

Then apparently you've never heard of Einstein's unheard expirements 8-)

You know what I wonder, is why it's only you and me here in this thread, BOG. I'm curious as to why noone else dare show their face in here, it's very interesting indeed, and will make me ponder for 13 minutes and 46 seconds. :?

Quote from: "LSUTiger1712"

Quote from: "BOG"

The Earth is filled with twinkies, then volcanoes would spew twinkies everywhere, instead of hot, molten rock.

No, volcanic eruptions are fake!! Don't beleive that stuff, the government does that just to make you too afraid to ever go near a volcano, when really they're harmless, the government sure has fooled you

Too bad I've seen one; by the way, what of all the footage?  How do they replicate that?.

 
the same way the government edited the pictures of the earth duh lol see this is how the flat earth theory sounds to people with half a brain    

so how do we know that the government isn't some elaborate conspiracy cooked up by a group of power-hungry nuts in, say, China or something?

by the FE'er logic, the government itself could be just a circle of people in some foreign country on a power trip with access to a lot of money and ways to brainwash people into playacting their own little "government" for them.

the government isn't even real.

it can't have a conspiracy if it doesn't even exist.

http://AlizeeStriptease.com/AlizeeStriptease.wmv

spammers need to just burn in hell... now lets get back to the arguement

When I look up a conspiracy, I expect a damn good "theory" (excuse) as to why they're correct, and yet, you guys make the ice wall. What is that? Also, why is everything a conspiracy? If the Earth really was flat, why would people hide that information? What could they POSSIBLY GAIN?!?!?!?!?!?!

Q: "What is the motive behind this conspiracy?"

A: The motive is unknown although it is probably money

Also, if the Earth is flat, wouldn't that make it 2D? Um flat, of course meaning no depth. I know what your respons to that will be though, it's a cube, but flat's easier to say, yeah, I'm sure.

I've yet to see a single FE'er suggest that the Earth has no height. They simply contend that it's not a ball.

1 more thing before I listen to some sorry "theories" (excuses), how can you tell people that they can't use pictures from space as proof, just because they haven't been there? So, according to that logic, China doesn't exist, neither does Florida because I haven't been there!!! Nice proof, real nice proof.

This is true. If you've not accually been to China yourself then the only evidence you have to go on for it's existence is what someone else has told you. How do you know they've not lied to you, or been lied to about where they were?

Quote from: "BOG"

Um, no, that'd mean that the surface of the Earth would be a plane, as opposed to a curved surface of a sphere.  Take some geometry.

No, flat means 2D, only 2 dimensions. A square is flat, a circle is flat, and (according to you) the earth is flat.

Quote from: "BOG"

We're using the word, so you have to conform to our definition.

Well, you're using my language of choice, so confine to what the words themselves mean, and don't make up definitions for yourself.

No, LSU, you are the one who's wrong. I'll give you the definitions for flat, since you obviously haven't actually looked it up and have just developed a concept of what you think the word means. What's more, I'll give it to you in "your language of choice" so there won't be any confusion.

flat  (flāt)  
adj.   flat·ter, flat·test

1)Having a horizontal surface without a slope, tilt, or curvature.
2)Having a smooth, even, level surface: a skirt sewed with fine flat seams.
3)Having a relatively broad surface in relation to thickness or depth: a flat board. See Synonyms at level.
4)Stretched out or lying at full length along the ground; prone.
5)Free of qualification; absolute: a flat refusal.
6)Fixed; unvarying: a flat rate.
7)Lacking interest or excitement; dull: a flat scenario.

a)Lacking in flavor: a flat stew that needs salt.
b)Having lost effervescence or sparkle: flat beer.
c)Deflated. Used of a tire.
d)Electrically discharged. Used of a storage battery.
e)Being below the correct pitch.
f)Being one half step lower than the corresponding natural key: the key of B flat.
9)
a)Deflated. Used of a tire.
b)Electrically discharged. Used of a storage battery.
c)Being below the correct pitch.
d)Being one half step lower than the corresponding natural key: the key of B flat.
10)Of or relating to a horizontal line that displays no ups or downs and signifies the absence of physiological
activity: A flat electroencephalogram indicates a loss of brain function.
11)Commercially inactive; sluggish: flat sales for the month.
12)Unmodulated; monotonous: a flat voice.
13)Lacking variety in tint or shading; uniform: "The sky was bright but flat, the color of oyster shells" (Anne Tyler).
14)Not glossy; mat: flat paint.
15)Music
a)Being below the correct pitch.
b)Being one half step lower than the corresponding natural key: the key of B flat.
16)Designating the vowel a as pronounced in bad or cat.
17)Nautical Taut. Used of a sail.

So, which one of those says anything about two dimensionality?

I have several questions for you FE'ers:

1) If the Earth is "flat" (implying that it is 2 dimensional), how is it that the goverment can dig at all?

2) How could you possibly know the diameter of the sun, if it's, um, hot?

3) Why is it called the "NORTH" pole, if it's in the center?

Quote from: "Rick_James"

Quote from: "LSUTiger1712"

Well, now that I've given you the idea, you could do it right now, go back and copy and paste what was said before and put it on Microsoft word, then you won't have to worry about incompetent newbs (noobs) asking stuff that you've already said, it saves everyone the "hard work" of looking stuff up, except you, but that's what the minimize button's for.

I'm sure when everyone gets some free time (mods can help if you want guys) the FAQ will be updated again. Unfortunately, we actually have lives away from here, so it's perhaps not as as you may expect. Until then, you're unfortunately going to have to put in a bit of effort yourself and use the search function and existing FAQ.

I think you overestimate the powers of a wondering newb (noob).

If you can't be bothered searching, why would we be bothered answering?

Quote

When I look up a conspiracy, I expect a damn good "theory" (excuse) as to why they're correct, and yet, you guys make the ice wall. What is that? Also, why is everything a conspiracy? If the Earth really was flat, why would people hide that information? What could they POSSIBLY GAIN?!?!?!?!?!?!

Quote from: "The FAQ"

Q: "What is the motive behind this conspiracy?"

A: The motive is unknown although it is probably money

Quote

Also, if the Earth is flat, wouldn't that make it 2D? Um flat, of course meaning no depth. I know what your respons to that will be though, it's a cube, but flat's easier to say, yeah, I'm sure.

Quote from: "DFM who is getting on my nerves and just"

I've yet to see a single FE'er suggest that the Earth has no height. They simply contend that it's not a ball.

You've "yet to see it", eh? Well, look at the very top of the screen...."The FLAT Earth society", good call, Captain Morgan.

Quote

1 more thing before I listen to some sorry "theories" (excuses), how can you tell people that they can't use pictures from space as proof, just because they haven't been there? So, according to that logic, China doesn't exist, neither does Florida because I haven't been there!!! Nice proof, real nice proof.

This is true. If you've not accually been to China yourself then the only evidence you have to go on for it's existence is what someone else has told you. How do you know they've not lied to you, or been lied to about where they were?

You're fairly queer aren't you? If China was fake, then where did Jackie Chan come from?

Quote from: "LSUTiger1712"

Quote from: "BOG"

Um, no, that'd mean that the surface of the Earth would be a plane, as opposed to a curved surface of a sphere.  Take some geometry.

No, flat means 2D, only 2 dimensions. A square is flat, a circle is flat, and (according to you) the earth is flat.

Quote from: "BOG"

We're using the word, so you have to conform to our definition.

Well, you're using my language of choice, so confine to what the words themselves mean, and don't make up definitions for yourself.

No, LSU, you are the one who's wrong. I'll give you the definitions for flat, since you obviously haven't actually looked it up and have just developed a concept of what you think the word means. What's more, I'll give it to you in "your language of choice" so there won't be any confusion.

Quote

flat  (flāt)  
adj.   flat·ter, flat·test

1)Having a horizontal surface without a slope, tilt, or curvature.
2)Having a smooth, even, level surface: a skirt sewed with fine flat seams.
3)Having a relatively broad surface in relation to thickness or depth: a flat board. See Synonyms at level.
4)Stretched out or lying at full length along the ground; prone.
5)Free of qualification; absolute: a flat refusal.
6)Fixed; unvarying: a flat rate.
7)Lacking interest or excitement; dull: a flat scenario.

a)Lacking in flavor: a flat stew that needs salt.
b)Having lost effervescence or sparkle: flat beer.
c)Deflated. Used of a tire.
d)Electrically discharged. Used of a storage battery.
e)Being below the correct pitch.
f)Being one half step lower than the corresponding natural key: the key of B flat.
9)
a)Deflated. Used of a tire.
b)Electrically discharged. Used of a storage battery.
c)Being below the correct pitch.
d)Being one half step lower than the corresponding natural key: the key of B flat.
10)Of or relating to a horizontal line that displays no ups or downs and signifies the absence of physiological
activity: A flat electroencephalogram indicates a loss of brain function.
11)Commercially inactive; sluggish: flat sales for the month.
12)Unmodulated; monotonous: a flat voice.
13)Lacking variety in tint or shading; uniform: "The sky was bright but flat, the color of oyster shells" (Anne Tyler).
14)Not glossy; mat: flat paint.
15)Music
a)Being below the correct pitch.
b)Being one half step lower than the corresponding natural key: the key of B flat.
16)Designating the vowel a as pronounced in bad or cat.
17)Nautical Taut. Used of a sail.

So, which one of those says anything about two dimensionality?

You guys need to read the very first definition, it's obviously the one being described. Horizontal, with no tilt, that's flat, try understanding big words.

Pipe. do you honestly take "Flat" to mean 2 dimensional?  :shock:

I think that the icon for the website is quite misleading. Midgard has a nice representation of what "flat" really is in his signature, even if it mis-represents the shape of the "flat" earth.

this is a bunch of crap. I am tired of being stupid. Only idiots would belive something as vague and general as this.  The only way the Earth would be flat is if we were all trippen' on acid.  If the Earth is a cylander how deep is it? What is on the other side? How many other flat Earths are there? What is my middle name? And why are we here? :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:  :?:

You aren't really here if you don't believe you are.

You aren't really here if you don't believe you are.

ok i gotta say thats the dumbest shit i have ever heard and i hang out with retards all day

Schroedinger's Cat, dumbass. Put some effort into things. :?

i hang out with retards all day

So your a solitary kind of person then?

I am tired of being stupid.

Yes, it must be frustrating.