Cut the crap.
Lord Kelvin and Simon Newcomb, two of the best mathematical physicists, applied the known laws of mechanics/fluid mechanics to the subject matter and found out that an object much heavier than air cannot sustain flight. If ideas from one hundred years ago have no relevance, according to you, then a paper written some 350 years ago, should have no relevance either, right?
This is a proven fact.
Then, you need an additional force to keep the jet airplane in flight, which is derived from torsion physics.
The article proves that no one today, not even the best engineers at Boeing, has any clue as to how lift is produced.
No one has the slightest clue as to how the F-117 (as an example) has lift.
The article proves it.
If you think you know better, please outline the physics: Bernoulli's theorem and Newton's third law are dismissed very quickly when it comes to explaining lift.
All of those papers agree with me: lift cannot be explained by using the known laws of mechanics/fluid mechanics.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1odAffPmcOhVX9D7wVXXiCS7caNOZywXg/viewScientific American, February 2020
No one can completely explain why planes stay in the air
By Ed Regis
One of the best scientific journals, using the most significant sources comes to a very certain final conclusion: no one can explain lift.