You just accept it because
Because of the plentiful evidence supporting it and nothing to refute it.
What evidence?
We have been over this countless times. You asking for evidence is an exercise in dishonesty.
You either dismiss it as fake, or claim that it is wrong and that it is actually based upon a FE, or claim it shouldn't happen on a RE and should on a FE. But what is consistent is the fact you are never able to justify those lies.
Some examples of the evidence would be the photos provided earlier on in the thread, showing the horizon clearly below eye level, or the photos of distant objects, where the bottom is obscured by level water, even though both the object and observer are above the water.
But there is plenty more. My favourite is the fact that there are 2 celestial poles which you can circle, keeping them on one side of you, and these poles are always 180 degrees apart. This is impossible on a FE.
And do you know what is better than evidence to show you are wrong?
Irrefutable logical arguments and simple questions you refuse to answer.
That is because you can't simply dismiss those arguments as fake like you can with evidence.
Like those which show that the tilt would be insignificant and that you can see the ground through a level tube.
Arguments you are yet to refute and just do whatever you can to avoid.
Again, 360 degrees * 30 km / 40000 km= 0.27 degrees. That is the tilt expected for those windmills.
There is no way out of this for you.
The amount hidden, based upon a 2 m observation height is h=(d-sqrt(2*o*R))^2/(2*R) = (30 km - sqrt(2 * 2 m * 6371 km))^2/(2*6371 km) = 49 m.
So plenty can be hidden without any significant tilt.
Again, simple math that shows beyond any doubt that your claims are pure BS, that you are blatantly lying to everyone to try to dismiss evidence for the globe and pretend it is evidence against the globe, all because of your irrational hatred of the globe.
Just like the simple questions you continually avoid show you know you are spouting BS.
You refuse to answer them because I have intentionally set them up in a way which does not depend on the shape of Earth, so you either admit you can see the ground through a level tube, including on a RE, or you lie and say you can't, which would apply on a FE and we go back to the tree.
Again, If you have a tube, 1 inch in a diameter and 10 inches long, with this tube level and you looking through the tube with your eye at the midpoint of the tube's height and directly against the end of the tube, how far below the tube can an object at 1 mile distance be, in order to still be visible through the tube?
Can you see the base of a tree at 1 mile distance, if the base of the tree is 6 ft below the level of the tube?
Again, what magic prevents us from seeing the RE through a level tube?
Already proven
Your repeated lies are not proof.
The only thing you have proven is how little you care for the truth.
Water level is the only thing needed
Which proves that Earth is round.
You are the one with nothing but lies.
It being real is the question, otherwise how can it be drawn to scale?
Quite easily.
You know the claimed distances, you can thus draw it to scale.
Why does something need to exist in reality to be drawn to scale?
This occurs quite often in the construction industry.
Buildings are drawn to scale before they are constructed. So before the building is real, to scale diagrams exist of them.
This also typically happens in manufacturing, where before components exist in reality, i.e. before they are real, to scale drawings exist of them.
But even things purely in fantasy can have to scale drawings and models made.
Drawing something to scale does not require it to exist in reality. All it requires is that the sizes are known.
Again, if you want to go down this path, the only honest thing for you to do is for you to say you have no idea what the tilt would be because you don't think Earth is real, and you have no idea if the ground should be visible through a level tube because you don't think Earth is real.
By claiming the tilt should be massive you are claiming to know the scales involved such that it would produce a massive tilt.
So either accept the fact that the tilt is insignificant, or accept the fact that you can determine what the tilt would be (numerically, not just "massive") even for an object that doesn't exist, and prove just what this tilt is, or claim that you cannot know what the tilt is and that you claiming it was massive was just wild speculation, or another blatant lie from you.
To be fair, you do struggle.....but, I'm ok with it even though it does become tedious.
The only one struggling in this thread (at least now) is you.
You continually struggle to justify your blatant lies against the RE.
Instead you just continually repeat them to pretend your irrational hatred is justified.
Nothing wrong with geometry for real stuff.
But there is a massive problem with the lies and strawmen you present against the RE.
For example, their is nothing wrong with the geometry for the real RE, which clearly shows the tilt is insignificant and you typically can see the ground through a level tube, even when that ground is curved or a downwards slope.
The problems only seem to arise when you start spouting BS.
what counts is how I understand what we are not living on, which is the nonsense global model we were bullied into accepting.
And what "counts" is that that "understanding" is based upon nothing more than irrational hatred.
You are completely incapable of justifying your irrational hatred of the globe.
Instead, all the evidence and logical thought indicates we do live on a globe.