The insulting is coming from you.
Says the one saying I am getting worked up into a frenzy, and repeatedly acting like I'm an imbecile that can't understand quite simple stuff, using those insult (and others) to yet again ignore the simple questions which show your contradiction.
Pointing out your contradictions is not an insult.
Exposing your lies about these contradictions is not an insult.
Exposing your dishonesty is not an insult.
Anyone will tell you I'm answering.
The problem you have is in accepting the answer whether you believe it or not.
No, they wouldn't. Again, you were asked simple questions, and you didn't answer.
Yes, you have some of them before, but the problem is that you continually contradict yourself.
If you were answering you would have told us what the maximum height below the tube an object can be to be seen at 1 mile distance and why.
You would have told us if we could see the ground at the base of a tree which is 6 ft below eye level.
You would have told us if we could see an object if it was 6 ft 1 inch below eye level.
You would have told us what magic stops the RE from being seen.
And plenty more.
The simple fact is you know you cannot honestly and consistently answer as it will expose your lie, so you just use whatever dishonest BS you can to avoid answering.
You're confused because you deliberately confuse yourself.
No, he is "confused" because you repeatedly contradict yourself.
You stated that you can see the ground, and even went so far as lying by claiming you never had an issue with that.
But then you go back and contradict yourself and claim you can't see the ground.
So people are "confused" because you repeatedly contradict yourself.
In order to attack the globe, you spout pure garbage, which is easily shown to be garbage. This results in people asking about simple things like trees in the distance, which then requires you to change your tune to avoid appearing completely insane, where you directly contradict your prior claims which you used to pretend the RE doesn't match reality, as that would show your claims don't match reality either.
But then when it comes back to a RE, you again contradict yourself, rejecting reality and rejecting what you admitted with regards to a tree because if you don't, there is no problem for the RE.
Perhaps if you were consistent rather than repeatedly contradicting yourself people would seem less "confused"?
You can start by answering the simple question, if you have a tube, 1 inch in a diameter and 10 inches long, with this tube level and you looking through the tube with your eye at the midpoint of the tube's height and directly against the end of the tube, how far below the tube can an object at 1 mile distance be, in order to still be visible through the tube?
Can you just simply and honestly answer this trivial question?
If you weren't repeatedly contradicting yourself and needing to change the answer depending on what was being discussed you would have no problem with answering this question, especially if you had already answered it like you claim.
So are you going to answer it, or will you continue with the dishonest BS?
Go and set up your foot long tube at around 6 feet and level it.
Now look through it and tell me what you see.
That post was explicitly talking about a FE. We live on a RE, so we can't do that.
Also, why bother going down this dishonest path yet again.
JJA did that and you just dismissed what he provided as fake and called him a liar, all because it showed you were wrong.