You try for a little bit then it comes down to digs and then the old troll comes out, then all the rest of the gunk.
No, you play along for a bit until going any further would mean admitting you are wrong, then you do whatever you can to dodge.
I don't make that up. You've just done it.
No you do make it up, pretending Earth is tiny ball.
This means my level view through a tube would mean your Earth curves away from me, downwards from your level vision by 8 inches for the first mile
Meanwhile, perspective/convergence/whatever you want to call it, would "compress" 2 m into less than an inch over a few 10s of m.
At this scale, the downwards curve of Earth is irrelevant.
It is only when you reach the horizon that the downwards curve starts beating perspective.
So, regardless of whether you mention peeling off like a cliff, it simply would create extreme measurable distance to ground over a few miles, as shown.
No, not as shown, as baselessly asserted.
We went over this before.
Over 1 mile the drop is 1 part in 7920. That is basically nothing.
It is not enough to magically make it vanish from your view.
Over 2 miles it is 1 part in 3960, again, basically nothing and not enough to hide it from your view.
It is nothing like what you try to pretend it is.
Just what do you think the "compressed size" of 8 inches is at 1 mile? What do you think it is for 3 feet at 2 miles? What about 6 feet at 3 miles?
The fact that we do see distant objects tells us that the Earth is absolutely 100% not a globe we supposedly walk/sail upon.
No, the fact we do see distant objects, but as the distance increases they are start to be obscured by Earth, from the bottom up, shows with almost certainty, that Earth is a globe.
You might need to ask yourself and your posse, who are acting child like to make you wonder why I seem to be from your side.
It is you, because you continually dodge extremely simple questions which show you are wrong, continually assert pure garbage, continually contradict yourself, outright lie and claim you have explained things you haven't, outright lie and you didn't contradict yourself when you did, make ridiculous demands for evidence, and then just dismiss the evidence provided as fake and provide more ridiculous demands and just ignore things which show you are wrong which you can't dismiss as fake, all while being 100% incapable of justifying any of your ridiculous outright lies about Earth, and then when challenged, you just pretend that what you are claiming with 100% certainty is merely your opinion rather than a fact so you don't need to back it up.
So it is quite clear who is acting like a child here.
I do not pass them off as factual
Again, when you state that you know something 100%, that is passing it of as a fact, not merely opinion.
You have continually done this with claims about the RE and how vision works and so on, even though those claims have been refuted repeatedly are you are entirely incapable of justifying them.
You stand by your outright lies even after people have proven them wrong and/or provided something significantly better, all because of your irrational hatred of the globe.
Your modus operandi, among other with your mindset, is to destroy all conflicts against the global system.
No, you are conflating the global system with the truth and reality.
Our modus operandi would be to destroy conflicts with reality.
If the nonsense you are spouting contradicts reality, it will be pointed out that it does.
Because, unlike your nonsense, the globe actually matches reality, you see this as trying to destroy things that go against the globe.
But if you bothered hollistically looking at what we have done here, you will see plenty of us actually point out faults with arguments in support of the globe, because those arguments are not based upon facts.
This means it isn't things which go against the globe that we object to, but things which go against reality, truth and reason, like your nonsense.
You start off pretending you understand stuff and then go into attack mode and back to square one.
Again, we aren't going back to square 1, you never leave it.
You never leave it, because as soon as you try, a massive contradiction pops up in your model and you just insult and claim we don't understand, simply because your model doesn't work.
For example, you repeatedly contradicted yourself regarding if we can or can't see an object below a level tube, and now you are still claiming a RE is magically invisible, with no justification at all.
If you really wanted to understand it, you would do so
And we do, and then show contradictions inside it, or contradictions between it and reality.
This is not us not understanding, this is us understanding and realising your claims are wrong.
Like how we brought up the tree to show your claim that you magically can't see things below a level tube because it gives you magic tunnel is completely wrong.
I've done plenty but they mean nothing
Because you continually refuse to provide them.
you don't accept simple stuff, like low pressure and how it works
You means we do accept how it works, and just don't agree with you, with your insane claims contradicted by evidence and backed up by none.
You don't allow yourself 5 minutes to actually question your side.
Yes we do.
Our side having answers doesn't mean we don't question it.
Meanwhile you don't allow questioning your side, as that shows the problems and your claims fall apart.
The same simple tube destroys your globe. It's as simple as that.
No, it doesn't. You accepting you see the tree and the ground below it destroys your argument.
Most of you are, so, what now?
No, we're not.
Our acceptance of the RE is based upon it being the best model to explain what is observed in reality.
If you can provide us with a better model, which can actually describe/explain reality, better than the current RE model, especially if you can show an actual problem with the RE model, then we will accept it.
Instead you just continually lie about the RE model and provide nonsense which is easily shown to be self contradictory and contradict reality.
Tit for tat but the issue should be, using the brain.
You should try using your brain some time then, rather than continually refusing to.