Bingo.
And a pure fantasy with no connection to reality.
Why is the tree floating in mid air?
Why is it tiny?
If you want to say you are just showing the visual compression, then why hasn't the distance from the eye line to the ground been compressed?
Again, this is a more honest representation if you want to play this game:
Notice how the ground curves up as well?
Or do you need it coloured and set up like the previous ones?
Showing how the more distant something is, the smaller it appears.
INCLUDING THE DISTANCE FROM YOUR EYE LINE TO THE GROUND!
Again, YOU CAN SEE THE GROUND!
As for what you see instead of the side view, that would be like on the right side of that image (bound between the purple lines).
You see the tree and the ground.
It has nothing to do with changing the tree itself.
Pretty scary you ask this mind.
No, the "scary" part is you thinking that in order to accurate represent it from a side view and show what is happening you need to shrink the tree.
But we both know why that is. Doing it honestly would mean admitting that you can see the ground, and you can't have that.
I already provided how to explain it all honestly.
The further away an object is, the smaller an angle it will subtend, all based upon the light following straight lines from the object to the eye.
There is no need to shrink the tree.
I could even do it with 2 different observers instead of 2 different trees.
No they're not.
Now you are starting to get it.
Because they aren't parallel, it means they are actually "fluted" like you keep dismissing.
Try drawing the side view diagram, properly too scale showing just how far apart those lines are.
Not flying trees, at all.
So you admit you can see the ground at the base of the tree through the tube?
You admit you can see the ground, even though it is BELOW the tube?
Because the parallel and even sight is correct if viewed from the side.
No, the parallel is correct when viewed from the front, where instead of lines, they appear as points, where the points subtend a particular angle.
When viewed from the side, as a side on view like what has been shown to you repeatedly, they are not parallel.
Instead they diverge.
What your eyes perceive is the converging effect, like looking down a funnel but that not being the reality.
Yes, just like in the diagrams repeatedly provided to you. But you seem to want to force that convergence into reality rather than it merely being a visual effect.
By demanding the tree is drawn small instead of its actual size, you are trying to make that convergence part of reality.