Again, WHAT MAGIC STOPS THE BLUE LINE?
There is no blue line in how you depict it.
Unless you can explain what magic stops it, THERE IS!
So again, WHAT MAGIC STOPS IT?
Repeatedly ignoring it rather than actually addressing the issue shows you have no case at all.
Foucault's pendulum proves absolutely nothing for a spinning globe.
It indicates Earth is rotating, as otherwise the plane of oscillation would remain stationary relative to Earth.
And additionally, the apparent motion of the plane of oscillation varies with latitude. This variation shows the surface is inclined relative to the axis of rotation for the vast majority of locations. And this inclination varies as a if the cross section of Earth is a circle.
More accurate devices which can measure the rotation at any angle confirm it.
I have my reasons for my thoughts. I have my reasons why I'm against the global mindset
So far that just seems to be either "I don't like it" or "I don't understand it".
You are yet to provide a single thing which actually seriously challenges the globe. Instead all you have are strawmen and dismissal.
you adhere to, unconditionally, it seems.
No, our adherence to it is conditional on it being supported by evidence and not refuted.
This is because we care about the truth.
Why should we discard an idea supported by mountains of evidence which you are unable to show fault with?
Why should we accept your alternative when you outright refuse to provide any evidence to support it, and which has been refuted countless times.
Especially when you admit you have no idea about so many things it isn't funny.
I'd be lying.
So you would be doing what you do basically all the time.
Just look at this thread where you have repeated the same pathetic lies without any ability to justify them, dismissing all evidence that shows you are wrong as fake and ignoring/avoiding all questions/logical proofs that you are wrong.
Yet you choose to deny everything you read about the true and real Earth.
No I don't. I choose to question and refuse to just believe what I'm told about what the Earth supposedly is.
No, you don't.
You are not merely questioning nor is anyone expecting you to just believe what you are told.
You are rejecting reality and dismissing evidence of reality as fake, and ignoring logical arguments which show your claims and "objections" to the RE to be pure garbage.
That is not questioning the RE. That is just outright rejection of reality.
You choose to believe in something that even you must see as, illogical.
No, we don't.
You are yet to provide a single thing that is illogical.
You not liking something does not make it nonsense or illogical.
Meanwhile, you believe things which literally directly contradict other things you believe.
It can't get more illogical than that.
My way of life is simply, believe nothing and question everything.
Then why believe Earth is flat?
Why believe all the pure nonsense you spout?
you also accept many things based on total illogical reasoning
Yet you are unable to provide a single example.
Again, you not liking something doesn't make it illogical.
Massive INDOCTRINATION.
Accepting the truth based upon evidence and logic is not indoctrination.
They haven't been measured to show reality.
You mean they haven't been measured in a way which supports your nonsense. That has no bearing on reality.
They have been measured in reality to show reality.
That reality not matching your nonsense means your nonsense is not reality.
Your massive denial is the denial of what is smack bang in your physical face
You mean the fact that Earth is round?
Because there is nothing smack bang in your physical face to indicate otherwise, nor to indicate it is stationary.
You are the one in massive denial of what is smack bang in your face.
I tried to explain this.
Think of a security light. If you look directly into that light, it's blinding. If you walked under it you would see what is reflecting that light.
You ma see changes to a carbon arc with goggles on or a filter but you will still see a reflection of it if you look from another angle.
You claim both are reflections.
Something arcing in the centre of Earth will likely have changes, so it's no surprising.
It is when it appears as a circle to the vision, regardless of where you look at it from, rather than an arc.
Each day, almost, there's silly nonsense that comes out and people just swallow it.
Silly things like the probe from the 70's just merrily on its way with a lifespan that suddenly goes way beyond it whilst travelling billions and billions of miles yet still sending back transmissions.
You know, crap like that.
i.e. things you don't like, or don't understand.
Devices are built with a particular lifespan in mind. This means all the components will last at least that long.
After this time, the only thing that is certain, at least with this type of probe, is that the available electrical power will be significantly reduced.
It doesn't mean the device will just blow up or magically stop working at this point.
So just what about that is crap?
Can you actually explain any problem with it, or is it simply a case of things you don't like or things you don't understand?