It only makes it marginally harder to set up but massively harder to cheat
No, it makes both significantly harder and doesn't make it relatively harder to cheat.
It requires you to carefully line up 3 crosshairs over 11 feet.
That will be quite hard. Especially if whoever is doing it doesn't have fancy equipment made to level distant poles.
And due to the angles involved, it will do nothing to stop someone who wants to cheat not having them actually level.
It stinks of dishonestly, no matter what you say.
It stinks of your dishonesty. You demand an experiment, and then dismiss it as fake when it shows you are wrong. You then add on a bunch more conditions to try to pretend the previous experiment you demanded wasn't good enough, when all your conditions to is make it more complicated.
Like I said, the simple ruler experiment shows you are wrong. There is no need to then go to one on a hill or the like.
What is your excuse for that?
He had a fake ruler custom made and switched them between photos?
Because like I said before, if he needs to tilt the tube down to see the lower number, then that would require the higher numbers to be cut off.
It shows that you can see beyond the edges of the tube.
Just like simple logic demands.
Again, what magic stops the blue line.
I did learn it. It was called severe indoctrination
Then you didn't learn.
If you did learn, then you wouldn't see it as indoctrination because you would actually understand.
Instead you didn't learn a thing, saw it as fake nonsense and just parroted back without any understanding at all.
you have had the ability to see past the story due to seeing it being questioned.
The only one promoting a story here is you.
You promote it with numerous outright lies.
Lies you refuse to justify with experiment or logic.
Likes which have been refuted by experiment and logic.
Get back to me when you've got something honest.
Follow your own advice. The only person currently in this thread who isn't showing any honesty is YOU!
So perhaps you should leave and come back when you've got something honest, like photos from your own experiments, or answers to the simple questions you continue to avoid:
What magic stops the blue line?
Do you accept that you can see an entire house through a much smaller level tube?
Why should the RE have a blend from light to dark as opposed to a clearly visible edge like all other round objects?
You are being very dishonest by claiming I called you a liar.
No, that is still you with the dishonesty. You are appealing to semantic BS.
You may have technically never directly said he is a liar, but the implication is clear.
You claim his experiment is fake, that even though he provided a photo clearly showing that the tube is level, that it magically wasn't level and that instead he intentionally tilted the tube down to pretend you can see the ground.
You are accusing him of extreme dishonesty when all you have to go on is that he proved you were wrong.
That is effectively calling him a liar.
Now then, if you don't want to do the experiment due to being unable to find a way to dupe me and others, that's only fine if you can actually respond to the logic and you stop repeating your pathetic demands for anyone to do your ridiculous experiments, especially after one was already done and showed you were wrong.
Are you shamed of your own setup?
See if you can replicate it.
Replicating it would require someone to have already done it. So perhaps you can go and do it first?