We do not see a convergence line.
We see a physical horizon that objects can go behind.
The fact you are saying this shows you seem not interested in finding the truth. You're only seem interested in keeping the mass indoctrinated opinion going.
And how does me stating what is clearly observed in reality make it seem that I am not interested in finding the truth?
It seems you just reject the truth and instead pretend in it "mass indoctrinated opinion", even though all you have to object to it is repeating the same pathetic, refuted lies.
Again, the fact you continually ignore simple logical arguments that show beyond any doubt that you are wrong shows that you do not give a damn about the truth and are not here seeking it.
The fact that you dismiss as fake simply because it shows you are wrong shows beyond any doubt that you don't give a damn about the truth.
Here is the same argument you have still refused to engage with in any rational manner:
1 - Looking down you see ground/sea, i.e. EARTH.
2 - Looking up you see sky.
3 - That means if you started out looking down and slowly raised your head, your would see some kind of transition between ground/sea and sky.
4 - Assuming there isn't anything getting in your way, this transition would be a line; below this line you would see ground/sea and above this line you would see sky.
5 - This is just like if you look at a basketball. You can see a line, "below" this line you see the ball, "above" this line you see the surroundings.
6 - This line would be the horizon for a round earth. So now the question becomes where is this line?
7 - Simple trig shows that the relationship between this angle, as measured from level, the radius of the ball, and your distance/height from the surface is:
cos(a)=r/(r+h).
8 - Doing the math for a RE when you are 2 m above it shows the horizon would only be 2.7 arc minutes below level, i.e. imperceptibly different from level, and entirely consistent with what is observed.
If you truly were seeking the truth you would engage with it, either admitting that it shows you are wrong and that one of your vey first claims in this thread was an outright lie, or you would actually try to refute it.
Again, the fact you don't, the fact you repeatedly ignore it, shows quite clearly that you don't care about the truth at all.
If that stash effort is to show a globe then the globe seems to be arcing UP....right?
Shouldn't it be arcing down from your view?
No, that isn't what it is showing at all.
Instead, just like normal, perspective makes thing further away appear closer to your line of sight.
Meanwhile the globe curves down.