You have no evidence anyone is hired to oppose you. Without evidence it is just a paranoid lie.
Your existance is an evidence. With this evidence number of globularists being here more than real earthers either because of they are hired or is a paranoid behave.
No, that is not evidence at all.
The vast majority of the world accepts that Earth is round.
Plenty of people actually care about the truth and your abhorrent anti-science attitude.
So it is perfectly reasonable that people will be here calling out your failed methods and explaining why it is wrong, without being hired to do so.
It also doesn't make much sense to hire so many people.
Your statement also makes no sense, the "globularists" are the "Real Earthers".
The flat Earthers are the fake Earthers.
It is not better. The best method is using flight times.
No, it isn't, as this thread clearly establishes.
If it was the best method you would not have the contradiction between the different flights.
If it was the best method (and your claim was correct) you wouldn't need to repeatedly ignore flights which show you are wrong.
Flight times is an extremely flawed method due to planes not flying directly to their destination at identical speeds.
Flight times is only marginally better than driving time.
The number of daylight hours is the best method, unless you are comparing cities which are very close, in which case you need to resort to a precise measurement of the angle of elevation the sun at solar noon.
Which route? Your claim a route does not make a route exist. I am not ignoring anything. Cut silly arguments.
The route you have been provided with several times, by several people, which you have ignored every time.
This flight between Istanbul and Moscow:
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/THY6163/history/20200902/1910Z/UUEE/LTFMThis flight which takes between 2 and 2.5 hours.
This flight which takes less time than a flight from Istanbul to Helsinki.
This flight, which if your methodology was correct (and "the best") would clearly demonstrate that Helsinki is NORTH of Moscow.
So it is quite clear why you continue to ignore it, because it shows you are wrong.
Going to cut your silly arguments and instead actually address this flight?
It works which one closer. Moscow simply further and it makes it further north.
No, if your horribly flawed methodology actually worked, then it would only show which is closer, not which is further north.
A city 100 km to the north is closer than a city 200 km to the west.
Simimar type of aircrafts have similar speed on the air, route being short or long affect it.
Firstly, that would only be the air speed not the ground speed. Depending upon conditions they can vary significantly.
Similar, not identical. So what is your uncertainty? You never provide that.
And why should we believe these aircraft are similar?
While it tells us BRU858 was a Embraer ERJ-190 twin jet, it tells us nothing about BYS434.
What plane was flying BYS434?
Without that information you have no basis at all to claim the speeds should be the same.
The only basis you could appeal to is the chart which shows the speed, which shows a cruising speed of ~400 km/hr for BYS434, and ~800 km/hr for BRU858. But that shows you are wrong.
So there is no basis to foolishly believe these 2 flights flew at the same speed, and thus all you are doing by using these flight times is showing that different planes/different routes fly at different speeds.
And again, your own links show your method is nonsense.
Look at the flight times recorded, for BYS434 we have a 1 hr 55 minute trip from SVO to MSQ.
But then on the trip back we have a 1 hr 35 minute trip. That is a difference of roughly 25%.
Looking at BRU858 (and ignoring the one which did not record the flight duration correctly, show in italics), we have from ~ 1hr, to ~1.5 hours. That is a difference of 33%.
So even for the same route. Some of this is due to using different aircraft.
But it shows beyond any doubt that this method has massive uncertainties and that you cannot simply pick 2 routes and then use a flight time to determine which is a shorter distance.
Your method is so flawed it isn't funny and relies upon wilful ignorance to all these problems.
Why does Helsinki receive more daylight hours than Moscow during their summer and less during their winter?
It is a claim need to be proven.
And it has been proven, you were provided with links to a site where you can verify it.
If you reject those you can happily go to the locations and determine it for yourself.
Again, stop dishonored hypocrital arguments with extaordinary dishonesty.
Follow your own advice.
Stop using flight times, as they have been repeatedly shown to not work for what you are trying to do.
If you are going to use flight times, make sure you include the uncertainty.
What's the speed of each aircraft? Look at your links. Yet another reason why your methodology is terrible.
You can find it here:
No you can't.
Where is ERJ-190 in that list? No where.
Where is whatever plane is used for BYS434? Who knows.
Poll