I discovered the fundamental cause of the eliptical orbit which led me to believe that there is one source for the movements of the Stars, Planets and Moons which move across the sky.
Sure, the apparent motion of objects across the sky is caused by the rotation of the Earth.
Since they all seem to be moving in the same circular direction, they must be influenced by a single object or force.
How does that follow? Your "discovery" overturns 300 years of coherent scientific observation. If we are going to throw out Newtonian physics, you should provide better evidence then "I discovered it." Try publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
there are no "North/South" satellites orbiting the earth
Umm. Yes there are. Here is an interesting applet, which shows you what satellites are up there. Notice the one's in
Polar orbits.
http://science.nasa.gov/realtime/jtrack/3d/JTrack3D.htmlAs for the Big Bang creation of the Universe coming out of "The Face of the Deep", or Island Earth, I ask the question, where is the deepest hole in the Earth? Is it not under the Artic Ocean?
No one claims that the Earth was created during the "Big Bang." And no, the deepest known "hole in the Earth" is the Marianas Trench in the Pacific Ocean.
Does not the Earth resemble a volcanic island in that rivers flow north to south.(Exept in places where a river begins in a mountain). Do we not have volcanic activity still today, billions of years after the earth cooled? What would keep the earths core hot after all these billions of years if not a "Super Volcano" the size of the entire known world Why no volcanic activity at the South Pole or even the North Pole?
A likely explanation is that the volcanic activity occurs only below a certain latitude because that is where the residule pressure remains, still venting from the Big Bang.
It is a simple task to take a planets known mass and distance from the sun, and calculate how long it will take to become tectonically inert. "Cooled off" if you will. Earth has not been around long enough to "cool off." This has been accepted since the 1800's.
Calling volcanic activity the cause of the Earths temperature is rather silly.
Finally, this is all just for fun. Right. No one really knows for sure. Even our camera lens will see a curved line at great distances, so to our own eyes. Even astronomers and will admit that much of what we know of the Universe is derived from mathematical computations.
So, this is just brain fun. I don't "believe" in anything until it is a proven fact.
Then what do you belive? I have said this dozens of times, but no one seems to listen. Science never "proves" anything. What we do is amass evidence and then design predictive models to explain phenomena. That's why we refer to things like "the atomic
theory of matter" and "The
theory of tectonic drift." Calling something a theory doesn't make it untrue, or unsupported, but these things are never referred to as facts because no scientific experiment can ever prove them.
What I can say is that the majority of
evidence says quite clearly that the Earth is round, and that your explanation (and understanding) of celestial mechanics is incorrect.
Come back when you have some evidence that what you are saying is true. Not speculation. Evidence.