Neowise

  • 139 Replies
  • 22033 Views
*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #90 on: July 27, 2020, 04:29:16 AM »
So far as I can tell the only reason why Wise is continuing to deny the existence of this comet is because he hasn't seen it for himself.  That seems to be one of the 'ground rules' for conspiracy theorists. You have to see it for yourself directly in order to believe it.  I guess he thinks that everyone else in this discussion who has 'claimed' to have seen it and provided photos they have taken are lying as well.

Of course you can always shut your eyes whenever you look at the skies in which case you will never see what you don't want to see.
Wrong. I am accepting its existance a theory because I did not see it. I am not denying it currently. So you start with false assumptions as a classic globalist perspective and end with the wrong decision.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #91 on: July 27, 2020, 04:31:41 AM »

So Wise, what is your conclusion, did you manage to get somewhere you could seriously look for this or are you happy to glance up at a light polluted sky and call bullshit in the face of all the evidence?
My house faces south and this comet is on the north side. When I go out in the evening, it does not attract my attention. There is no reason for me to trust you Jimmy, nor another globularist. The fact that a true flat earther sees this increases the reality of the claim. Right now, everything is claim in my side. I can't say whether it's wrong or true. I'm just questioning.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

JJA

  • 6869
  • Math is math!
Re: Neowise
« Reply #92 on: July 27, 2020, 09:45:31 AM »
There is no reason for me to trust you Jimmy, nor another globularist. The fact that a true flat earther sees this increases the reality of the claim. Right now, everything is claim in my side. I can't say whether it's wrong or true. I'm just questioning.

There is a major flaw in your reasoning here. You distrust everything a "globularist" says but will trust anyone who claims to be a true flat earther.

You have it backwards, you accept or reject evidence solely on if it agrees with your beliefs. This is not following the evidence, it's rejecting reality and only accepting what you already "know" to be true. Cherry picking to the highest degree.

There are millions of people who have seen the comet, it exists, there are pictures all over, scientists talking about it, everyday people are photographing it. I've provided photographic evidence, so have many others in this and other threads. There is no room for doubt here, the proof is overwhelming.

Re: Neowise
« Reply #93 on: July 27, 2020, 10:38:55 AM »
Quote
There are millions of people who have seen the comet, it exists, there are pictures all over, scientists talking about it, everyday people are photographing it. I've provided photographic evidence, so have many others in this and other threads. There is no room for doubt here, the proof is overwhelming.

Here are just a few of them.  You will notice these photos are literally from all over the world.

https://spaceweathergallery.com/index.php?title=neowise

Re: Neowise
« Reply #94 on: July 27, 2020, 02:28:32 PM »

My house faces south and this comet is on the north side. When I go out in the evening, it does not attract my attention.

Hahahahahahahaha!  Make sure you don't accidentally look that direction!

Re: Neowise
« Reply #95 on: July 27, 2020, 04:37:13 PM »

My house faces south and this comet is on the north side. When I go out in the evening, it does not attract my attention.

Hahahahahahahaha!  Make sure you don't accidentally look that direction!
His house faces south, therefore it is obvious that the northern night sky does not exist for him. 

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Neowise
« Reply #96 on: July 27, 2020, 05:43:58 PM »

My house faces south and this comet is on the north side.

You don't need to point your house at it.   ::)

Re: Neowise
« Reply #97 on: July 28, 2020, 02:04:59 AM »

My house faces south and this comet is on the north side.

You don't need to point your house at it.   ::)
I'm not sure he gets out much, so has to rely on looking out the window.
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #98 on: July 28, 2020, 02:50:37 AM »

My house faces south and this comet is on the north side.

You don't need to point your house at it.   ::)
Doesn't it matter whether it would be there when I opened the window?
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #99 on: July 28, 2020, 02:53:27 AM »
There is no reason for me to trust you Jimmy, nor another globularist. The fact that a true flat earther sees this increases the reality of the claim. Right now, everything is claim in my side. I can't say whether it's wrong or true. I'm just questioning.

There is a major flaw in your reasoning here. You distrust everything a "globularist" says but will trust anyone who claims to be a true flat earther.
I have mark your mistakes. I told being a flat earther increases the possiblity of claim being true, not makes it a reality. Of course, I do not trust anyone. But flat earthers are more reliable than globularists. I have pointed that fact.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

JJA

  • 6869
  • Math is math!
Re: Neowise
« Reply #100 on: July 28, 2020, 03:42:12 AM »
There is no reason for me to trust you Jimmy, nor another globularist. The fact that a true flat earther sees this increases the reality of the claim. Right now, everything is claim in my side. I can't say whether it's wrong or true. I'm just questioning.

There is a major flaw in your reasoning here. You distrust everything a "globularist" says but will trust anyone who claims to be a true flat earther.
I have mark your mistakes. I told being a flat earther increases the possiblity of claim being true, not makes it a reality. Of course, I do not trust anyone. But flat earthers are more reliable than globularists. I have pointed that fact.

I have marked your mistakes.

You still claim there is "no reason" to trust any globularist. You are throwing out evidence like based on who says it.

Why is someone who believes in a round earth automatically a liar and untrustworthy?  Only because it conflicts with your beliefs. That's the flaw in your reasoning and arguing, you have pre-decided you are right, and simply refuse to accept any facts.

Even the fact of a comet that millions of people are seeing every night. You are not "just questioning" you are denying reality.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #101 on: July 28, 2020, 04:11:04 AM »
There is no reason for me to trust you Jimmy, nor another globularist. The fact that a true flat earther sees this increases the reality of the claim. Right now, everything is claim in my side. I can't say whether it's wrong or true. I'm just questioning.

There is a major flaw in your reasoning here. You distrust everything a "globularist" says but will trust anyone who claims to be a true flat earther.
I have mark your mistakes. I told being a flat earther increases the possiblity of claim being true, not makes it a reality. Of course, I do not trust anyone. But flat earthers are more reliable than globularists. I have pointed that fact.

I have marked your mistakes.

You still claim there is "no reason" to trust any globularist. You are throwing out evidence like based on who says it.

Why is someone who believes in a round earth automatically a liar and untrustworthy?  Only because it conflicts with your beliefs. That's the flaw in your reasoning and arguing, you have pre-decided you are right, and simply refuse to accept any facts.

Even the fact of a comet that millions of people are seeing every night. You are not "just questioning" you are denying reality.
You are insisting your mistake instead of accepting your mistake. Because this is how you have been programmed. You are using same program with Jackblack the angry racist. Unfortunately, you are programmed not to learn, to not accept your mistakes and to object to everything. It is pathetic for someone to pay you for such a strange task.

I am talking about increasing the possiblity, not a reality. Being a flat earther makes a man more trusty than a globularist, but not full of trusty. This is what I told, and keep telling. This is different than your telling that I supposedly claimed a flat earther is a trusty one.

Every sane person will realize that you made a logic mistake above but did not accept it. But we cannot expect a sane logic of an angry globalist program programmed to object everything a flat earther when tells truth.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

JJA

  • 6869
  • Math is math!
Re: Neowise
« Reply #102 on: July 28, 2020, 04:11:42 AM »
You are insisting your mistake instead of accepting your mistake. Because this is how you have been programmed. You are using same program with Jackblack the angry racist. Unfortunately, you are programmed not to learn, to not accept your mistakes and to object to everything. It is pathetic for someone to pay you for such a strange task.

I am talking about increasing the possiblity, not a reality. Being a flat earther makes a man more trusty than a globularist, but not full of trusty. This is what I told, and keep telling. This is different than your telling that I supposedly claimed a flat earther is a trusty one.

Every sane person will realize that he made a logic mistake above but did not accept it. But we cannot expect a sane logic from a globalist.

No, you said there is NO REASON to trust a globularist.

You didn't say possibility, you said NO REASON.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #103 on: July 28, 2020, 04:12:25 AM »
You are insisting your mistake instead of accepting your mistake. Because this is how you have been programmed. You are using same program with Jackblack the angry racist. Unfortunately, you are programmed not to learn, to not accept your mistakes and to object to everything. It is pathetic for someone to pay you for such a strange task.

I am talking about increasing the possiblity, not a reality. Being a flat earther makes a man more trusty than a globularist, but not full of trusty. This is what I told, and keep telling. This is different than your telling that I supposedly claimed a flat earther is a trusty one.

Every sane person will realize that he made a logic mistake above but did not accept it. But we cannot expect a sane logic from a globalist.

No, you said there is NO REASON to trust a globularist.

You didn't say possibility, you said NO REASON.
Yes. I told there is NO REASON to trust a globularist. But being a flat earther gives it a possiblity, not makes a reality. You get the difference? I don't think so. Because the series of the program you have belong never accept the mistake you made.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

JJA

  • 6869
  • Math is math!
Re: Neowise
« Reply #104 on: July 28, 2020, 04:39:16 AM »
You are insisting your mistake instead of accepting your mistake. Because this is how you have been programmed. You are using same program with Jackblack the angry racist. Unfortunately, you are programmed not to learn, to not accept your mistakes and to object to everything. It is pathetic for someone to pay you for such a strange task.

I am talking about increasing the possiblity, not a reality. Being a flat earther makes a man more trusty than a globularist, but not full of trusty. This is what I told, and keep telling. This is different than your telling that I supposedly claimed a flat earther is a trusty one.

Every sane person will realize that he made a logic mistake above but did not accept it. But we cannot expect a sane logic from a globalist.

No, you said there is NO REASON to trust a globularist.

You didn't say possibility, you said NO REASON.
Yes. I told there is NO REASON to trust a globularist. But being a flat earther gives it a possiblity, not makes a reality. You get the difference? I don't think so. Because the series of the program you have belong never accept the mistake you made.

Yes, you trust SOME flat earthers but trust NO non-flat earthers.

That's still not a rational argument to determine truth.

There are things I would believe you if you said them, but you will never accept anything I say. 

You are locked into your thinking, and only listen to opinions you already accept.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #105 on: July 28, 2020, 04:42:22 AM »
You are insisting your mistake instead of accepting your mistake. Because this is how you have been programmed. You are using same program with Jackblack the angry racist. Unfortunately, you are programmed not to learn, to not accept your mistakes and to object to everything. It is pathetic for someone to pay you for such a strange task.

I am talking about increasing the possiblity, not a reality. Being a flat earther makes a man more trusty than a globularist, but not full of trusty. This is what I told, and keep telling. This is different than your telling that I supposedly claimed a flat earther is a trusty one.

Every sane person will realize that he made a logic mistake above but did not accept it. But we cannot expect a sane logic from a globalist.

No, you said there is NO REASON to trust a globularist.

You didn't say possibility, you said NO REASON.
Yes. I told there is NO REASON to trust a globularist. But being a flat earther gives it a possiblity, not makes a reality. You get the difference? I don't think so. Because the series of the program you have belong never accept the mistake you made.

Yes, you trust SOME flat earthers but trust NO non-flat earthers.

<null / misspredictions>
No, I do not trust anybody that I have numerously told. What happens when you accept your mistake? Will the program be booted, deleted, and a new one written? Is it really that hard? Is accepting your "clear mistake can be seen by everybody" becomes an error cause you blue screen? sleight of mouth does not magically make you right but proves only you have better English. This is the only thing you have better. Because I am as smart as can talk in your language, oh, of couse, you can not do such a thing. Dimi lan yavşak?  ;D
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

LuggerSailor

  • 217
  • 12 men on the Moon, 11 of them Scouts.
Re: Neowise
« Reply #106 on: July 28, 2020, 06:07:10 AM »

My house faces south and this comet is on the north side. When I go out in the evening, it does not attract my attention. There is no reason for me to trust you Jimmy, nor another globularist. The fact that a true flat earther sees this increases the reality of the claim. Right now, everything is claim in my side. I can't say whether it's wrong or true. I'm just questioning.

My house faces West. I can leave by the back door (facing East) and turn left to see the comet.

Neowise is quite dim but not as dim as Wise.
LuggerSailor.
Sailor and Navigator.

*

JJA

  • 6869
  • Math is math!
Re: Neowise
« Reply #107 on: July 28, 2020, 06:46:28 AM »
You are insisting your mistake instead of accepting your mistake. Because this is how you have been programmed. You are using same program with Jackblack the angry racist. Unfortunately, you are programmed not to learn, to not accept your mistakes and to object to everything. It is pathetic for someone to pay you for such a strange task.

I am talking about increasing the possiblity, not a reality. Being a flat earther makes a man more trusty than a globularist, but not full of trusty. This is what I told, and keep telling. This is different than your telling that I supposedly claimed a flat earther is a trusty one.

Every sane person will realize that he made a logic mistake above but did not accept it. But we cannot expect a sane logic from a globalist.

No, you said there is NO REASON to trust a globularist.

You didn't say possibility, you said NO REASON.
Yes. I told there is NO REASON to trust a globularist. But being a flat earther gives it a possiblity, not makes a reality. You get the difference? I don't think so. Because the series of the program you have belong never accept the mistake you made.

Yes, you trust SOME flat earthers but trust NO non-flat earthers.

<null / misspredictions>
No, I do not trust anybody that I have numerously told. What happens when you accept your mistake? Will the program be booted, deleted, and a new one written? Is it really that hard? Is accepting your "clear mistake can be seen by everybody" becomes an error cause you blue screen? sleight of mouth does not magically make you right but proves only you have better English. This is the only thing you have better. Because I am as smart as can talk in your language, oh, of couse, you can not do such a thing. Dimi lan yavşak?  ;D

Please quit adding words I didn't say to my posts in the debate forum.  Keep that to Angry Ranting.

You can speak more languages than I can, that's true.  While I've pointed out places where you should look up words, I try not to make fun of your English out of respect for that.

But don't attack me because you use the wrong words. 

You say NO "globularist" can ever be trusted, but there is the POSSIBILITY of believing a flat Earther. That's still clear evidence of your blanket denial of the facts, as it shouldn't matter who says them. That's false logic.

Re: Neowise
« Reply #108 on: July 28, 2020, 11:17:43 AM »
Wise seems to be totally obsessed with 'trust'.  Something that appears to be typical of many conspiracy theorists. Their state of mind is such that they don't trust anyone who holds a different belief to them. Why is that?  Because I guess that's what lies at the heart of many conspiracy theories. Not just flat Earth.

To me discussing the pros and cons of flat Earth belief is not about trust and there will always be respect from me. That doesn't mean I can't challenge what flat Earth believers think. Wise though just seems to think that anyone who doesn't share his beliefs is lying to him.  Not the case.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2020, 11:27:57 AM by Solarwind »

*

JackBlack

  • 23376
Re: Neowise
« Reply #109 on: July 28, 2020, 02:21:37 PM »
Unfortunately, you are programmed not to learn, to not accept your mistakes and to object to everything.
Good job projecting.
You are the one who makes countless mistakes and refuses to ever correct them.
You outright reject any evidence that shows you are wrong and just insult those who show you are wrong. It is truly pathetic.

Being a flat earther makes a man more trusty than a globularist, but not full of trusty.
See, this is yet another mistake from you.
Being a flat Earther doesn't make someone more trustworthy than a REer.
If anything it makes them less trustworthy.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #110 on: July 29, 2020, 12:24:09 AM »
You are insisting your mistake instead of accepting your mistake. Because this is how you have been programmed. You are using same program with Jackblack the angry racist. Unfortunately, you are programmed not to learn, to not accept your mistakes and to object to everything. It is pathetic for someone to pay you for such a strange task.

I am talking about increasing the possiblity, not a reality. Being a flat earther makes a man more trusty than a globularist, but not full of trusty. This is what I told, and keep telling. This is different than your telling that I supposedly claimed a flat earther is a trusty one.

Every sane person will realize that he made a logic mistake above but did not accept it. But we cannot expect a sane logic from a globalist.

No, you said there is NO REASON to trust a globularist.

You didn't say possibility, you said NO REASON.
Yes. I told there is NO REASON to trust a globularist. But being a flat earther gives it a possiblity, not makes a reality. You get the difference? I don't think so. Because the series of the program you have belong never accept the mistake you made.

Yes, you trust SOME flat earthers but trust NO non-flat earthers.

<null / misspredictions>
No, I do not trust anybody that I have numerously told. What happens when you accept your mistake? Will the program be booted, deleted, and a new one written? Is it really that hard? Is accepting your "clear mistake can be seen by everybody" becomes an error cause you blue screen? sleight of mouth does not magically make you right but proves only you have better English. This is the only thing you have better. Because I am as smart as can talk in your language, oh, of couse, you can not do such a thing. Dimi lan yavşak?  ;D

Please quit adding words I didn't say to my posts in the debate forum.  Keep that to Angry Ranting.

You can speak more languages than I can, that's true.  While I've pointed out places where you should look up words, I try not to make fun of your English out of respect for that.

But don't attack me because you use the wrong words. 

You say NO "globularist" can ever be trusted, but there is the POSSIBILITY of believing a flat Earther. That's still clear evidence of your blanket denial of the facts, as it shouldn't matter who says them. That's false logic.
I did not add anything to you words. I have removed the unimportant part of your words and wrote it inside blankets.

A globularist in this forum is mostly a liar, hence, no need to trust any. This is my choice and you can not get intervene it. Trying to change my choices this way makes you a tyrant.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #111 on: July 29, 2020, 12:32:30 AM »
Being a flat Earther doesn't make someone more trustworthy than a REer.
It makes. Because very majority of globularists I knew here are liar. But I did not aware a real flat earther here when lying. This is a statistics and I take it in the consideration. What's wrong with it? If you really want me trust any of you, it is so simple, just cut lying. Look how easy but you refute it. When you refute to telling truth, you claim you tell truth. And this behave increases your distrust. I trust globularists here as value as zero or below.

Anything may be true instantly becomes unlikely to be true, just because when only a globalist supports it. This is the result of my experiences in this forum about globularists like you and others.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

Jura-Glenlivet II

  • Flat Earth Inquisitor
  • 6471
  • Will I still be perfect tomorrow?
Re: Neowise
« Reply #112 on: July 29, 2020, 12:59:17 AM »

In the face of mounting evidence and all his questions being answered, the intransigent has to conclude that those who responded in good faith are liars, whereas he, for fear of stumbling across something that would collapse his poorly made house of cards, makes excuses for not going out and finding some thing that millions of others did.

You are a man of no honour wise. 
Life is meaningless and everything dies.

Every man makes a god of his own desire

*

JackBlack

  • 23376
Re: Neowise
« Reply #113 on: July 29, 2020, 01:24:50 AM »
A globularist in this forum is mostly a liar, hence, no need to trust any.
That is completely illogical and an extremely dishonest double standard.
Plenty of flatarists in this forum are outright liars that lie in almost every post they make. So by the same standard you shouldn't trust any FEer.

But logically, just because one person lies, doesn't mean everyone in their group lies.

It makes. Because very majority of globularists I knew here are liar.
Are they actually liars, or do they just you to be wrong so you dismiss them as liars?

But I did not aware a real flat earther here when lying.
Again, is this actually a case of them not lying, or just them being FEers so you say they don't lie, or you just saying they aren't real FEers because they are lying?

On this forum I have seen far more lying by those who claim to be FEers than those who claim to be REers.
And that is including cickljamas as a REer.

There is no logical basis for you to distrust REers. The sole reason you do so is because you don't want accept Earth is round so you will reject everything they say.

Just look at yourself. You claim to be a FEer, yet repeatedly dismiss evidence as lies, make outrageous claims with no supporting evidence to try and dismiss flights that prove your map to be wrong, and repeatedly ignore the evidence which clearly shows that this comet was discovered in March.

Anything may be true instantly becomes unlikely to be true, just because when only a globalist supports it. This is the result of my experiences in this forum about globularists like you and others.
You mean how we support the truth while you dismiss it, but because it doesn't agree with you you make up excuses?

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #114 on: July 29, 2020, 01:32:43 AM »
I, Jackblack, rabinoz, boydster, crouton, John Davis and Space Cowgirl are people of no honour wise.
Corrected for you, reported and mentioned in the other places as a proof how you angry globularists are desperate that only have to insult ability, mister chearleader. How you have a great honor a male with a female profile. You are here, a flat earth forum as you an angry globularist does not belong here with any bit part of you. Brava!
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #115 on: July 29, 2020, 01:34:50 AM »
That is completely illogical and an extremely dishonest double standard.
Nope. Your all posts are illogical and extremely trible standard. Mines are true, whether or not you agree. love it or leave it.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

JackBlack

  • 23376
Re: Neowise
« Reply #116 on: July 29, 2020, 02:25:23 AM »
I, Jackblack, rabinoz, boydster, crouton, John Davis and Space Cowgirl are people of no honour wise.
Corrected for you, reported and mentioned in the other places as a proof how you angry globularists are desperate that only have to insult ability, mister chearleader.
See, there you go with more outright lies, insults and dishonesty.
You change what someone says, outright lying in the process and insulting them.


You are here, a flat earth forum as you an angry globularist does not belong here with any bit part of you. Brava!
No, this is a debate forum, for debates regarding the FE model, including if Earth is actually flat.

Nope. Your all posts are illogical and extremely trible standard. Mines are true, whether or not you agree. love it or leave it.
Is that why you repeatedly resort to insults and dismissal or just completely ignoring posts rather than providing a rational argument to show the problem?
Is that why you continually ignored the link from a page dated April 1, clearly showing that the comet was discovered on March 27; and instead repeatedly falsely claimed that the comet was just made up recently and not discovered so much earlier?

Even now you haven't admitted it.
Here is the link again:
https://minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K20/K20G05.html
Still going to claim that the comet was just made up in July?

It sure seems like it is your posts which are illogical and false.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #117 on: July 29, 2020, 02:52:57 AM »
See, there I go with more outright lies, insults and dishonesty.
If you think you will insult me ​​and you will profit from this, you are wrong. You may have bought admins. I can still give you the answer you deserve. Your own sentence, if it is a crime, you are the criminal. If it's not a crime, so shut up and keep quietly following my steps.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

JackBlack

  • 23376
Re: Neowise
« Reply #118 on: July 29, 2020, 04:16:20 AM »
[lies lies lies]
If you think you will insult me
I'm not insulting you, you are insulting us, as you do everytime you are shown to be wrong and have no rational defense.
Even then you go and blatantly lie about what you are doing.

GROW UP!

Like I said, care to address the link now?
https://minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K20/K20G05.html
Still going to claim that the comet was just made up in July?
Or will you be honest for once in your life and admit that the comet was discovered in March?

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26153
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Neowise
« Reply #119 on: July 29, 2020, 04:23:22 AM »
[lies lies lies]
If you think you will insult me
I'm not insulting you, you are insulting us, as you do everytime you are shown to be wrong and have no rational defense.
Even then you go and blatantly lie about what you are doing.

GROW UP!

Like I said, care to address the link now?
https://minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K20/K20G05.html
Still going to claim that the comet was just made up in July?
Or will you be honest for once in your life and admit that the comet was discovered in March?
I am not going to open external links.  8)

You are trying to bait me, to get my personnel information, to get my money in bank account, and moreover, to try to kill me. I don't eat it!

No, you are insulting me.

See, there you go with more outright lies, insults and dishonesty.
Dishonesty is an insult. If it is not an insult, let me call you dishonest everytime I see you, because you are actually so.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Bulma
JimmyTheLobster (Jura's alt)

I知 I a globalist AI.