If ether doesn’t exist no phase shift would be seen.
It seems that you have no idea what you are talking about. Yes, if ether doesn't exist no phase shift would be seen, but phase shift had been seen, which (ether's existence) was proven numerous times, and these proofs are not in favor of your heliocentric belief, quite contrary. How come you are so ignorant about such a basic facts, despite numerous lessons i gave you for free on this subject (all these years)?
Einstein said to Sir Herbert Samuel:
“If Michelson-Morley is wrong, then relativity is wrong.” (Einstein: The Life and Times, p. 107)
The fact is, the Michelson-Morley experiment WAS wrong, or at the least, it didn’t give the results that Relativists claim it did. The M-M experiment is touted as discovering that there was no aether entrainment around the earth.
From this supposed evidence, Einstein had two alternatives. Either he would have to admit the earth did not move, or he would have to invent a whole new physics to explain it.
For there seemed to be only three alternatives. The first was that the earth was standing still, which meant
scuttling the whole Copernican theory and was unthinkable. The second was that the aether was carried
along by the earth...The third solution was that the aether simply did not exist, which to many nineteenth
century scientists was equivalent to scrapping current views of light, electricity, and magnetism, and
starting again. (Ibid., p. 110)
As everyone knows, Einstein chose the latter option and he turned physics on its head. But the
truth is, the M-M experiment, even with their prototypical equipment, showed a small positive
result of the presence of aether, yet today’s textbooks continue to claim M-M had a null result.
The presence of aether was followed by Sagnac in 1913, and again by Michelson-Gale in 1925,
and again by Dayton Miller in 1933, and again by Herbert Ives in 1943, and by dozens of other
researchers. In fact, Miller used instruments three times as sensitive as Michelson-Morley, and
performed 100,000 experiments, whereas Michelson-Morley only did 36. Miller told the
scientific community that his results were in agreement with the positive results of Michelson-
Morley. But what did the Relativist camp do with this information? You guessed it. They
suppressed it. In fact, Einstein enlisted the services of R. S. Shankland to discredit the work of
Dayton Miller. How did Shankland accomplish this charade? He only used the results from
Miller’s experiments that had been rejected by Miller himself, since those results had aberrations
due to equipment problems or thermal conditions. Letters from Einstein to Shankland show that
Einstein is very aware that Miller’s experiments were a stumbling block to Relativity theory. In a
letter to Shankland, Einstein writes:
I thank you very much for sending me your careful study about the Miller experiments. Those
experiments conducted with so much care, merit, of course, a very careful statistical investigation. This is
more so as the existence of a not trivial positive effect would affect very deeply the fundament of
theoretical physics as it is presently accepted. (August 31, 1954)
As anyone without a bias can see, the whole theory of Relativity is based on one experiment in
1887 whose data was falsified, or at the least, misinterpreted. It is no wonder that Einstein makes
no reference to the 1913 Sagnac or the 1925 Michelson-Gale experiments which proved that
aether exists; and Einstein did his best to silence Miller. These are the facts that people today
don’t know, or at least wish to ignore. Unfortunately for them, once Einstein’s tricks and
falsifications are exposed, then the whole Big-Bang /Evolutionary /Galilean /Relativity sham will
be brought to nought for the deception that it is; and I will do my best to bring that knowledge to
the world, so help me God.