Are you really arguing that she didn't write that she was a dead astronaut on her CV? A pretty poor argument.
Didn't she? What a shame... :lol:
Just one? How about two?
You don't have two. You don't even have 1.
Now like I said, pick one and stick to it.
If you are going to spam a bunch of them because you aren't capable of defending one and instead need to jump between them, it shows you have none.
So take your pick, choose ONE and defend that 1, or I will take it you have none.
What will it be?
So, according to you, two is less than one, and three is less than four, and so on?
It’s one thing that one of the Challenger’s crew members resembles someone alive today. For that, we can chalk it up to a coincidence.
It’s another thing entirely that SIX members of the Challenger crew have doppelgangers who are alive, in some cases with exactly the same names (Richard Scobee, Michael J. Smith, Judith Resnick, Sharon McAuliffe).
What are the chances of that?Have you noticed that all remaining four of them have the same names?
Only two alleged twin brothers have different names, four others have the same names, how convenient?!?!?
What's more, those who are not even related (allegedly) (Richard Scobee, Michael J. Smith, Judith Resnick, Sharon McAuliffe) are even more alike to their Challenger crew doppelgangers than it is the case regarding the degree of the apparent resemblance between two pairs of (alleged) twin brothers.
To recap :
Two out of six are identical twins.
Remaining four are even more mutually alike than we should expect to be the case between identical twins.
Remaining four have the same names.
All six are the same age as their Challenger crew doppelgangers.
And now you can even see forensic analysis :