NASA EPIC LIES

YOU ONLY NEED TO PROVE ONE OF THEM TO BE THE SAME PERSON TO PROVE THE THEORY :




What follows is at the level (of credibility) of the fairytale about 9/11 highjacker passport that was allegedly found moments before the World Trade Center 2 (South Tower) collapsed :





Ronald McNair is next. He was a Mission Specialist on the crew. The official story is that this picture below is of Carl McNair, who just happens to be Ronald’s twin brother. If you believe that, then I’ve got some land in Florida I think you might be interested in. Here you can see “Carl” McNair on LinkedIn, where he happens to be a “Best-Selling Author, Inspirational Speaker and Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Education Consultant.”

Ellison Onizuka is still alive. The official story in Ellison’s case is also an “identical twin brother” coincidence. So apparently, that’s not Ellison on the right, it’s his brother Claude. Yeah, right. Wink, wink. :lol:

THE BEST VIDEO EVER MADE ON THIS TOPIC :

Challenger Crew Still Alive and Kicking :

Challenger Crew Still Alive and Kicking :

I remember watching this when it happened.

Those people died, and this kind of thing makes me literally sick to my stomach.

Most of those pictures have been debunked. They are pictures of sisters, brothers, unrelated photos. Many have been tracked down. Google if if you want, but it's all just hurtful nonsense.

Wellcome back, cikljamas.

Nice working even the most retards need to agree.

Quote from: cikljamas on May 30, 2020, 04:45:45 AM

Challenger Crew Still Alive and Kicking :

I remember watching this when it happened.

Those people died, and this kind of thing makes me literally sick to my stomach.

Most of those pictures have been debunked. They are pictures of sisters, brothers, unrelated photos. Many have been tracked down. Google if if you want, but it's all just hurtful nonsense.

Let me show you one another example of mathematical impossibility :

“Richard Charnin is an author and quantitative software developer with advanced degrees in applied mathematics and operations research. He paints a very clear portrait of the JFK witness deaths in the context of the mathematical landscape: I have proved mathematically what many have long suspected: The scores of convenient JFK unnatural witness deaths cannot be coincidental.15”
― Richard Belzer, Hit List: An In-Depth Investigation Into the Mysterious Deaths of Witnesses to the JFK Assassination

“In the three-year period which followed the murder of President Kennedy and Lee Harvey Oswald, 18 material witnesses died:”
― Richard Belzer, Hit List: An In-Depth Investigation Into the Mysterious Deaths of Witnesses to the JFK Assassination

“An actuary engaged by the London Times calculated the probability that at least 18 witnesses would die of any cause within 3 years of the JFK assassination as 1 in 100,000 trillion.5”
― Richard Belzer, Hit List: An In-Depth Investigation Into the Mysterious Deaths of Witnesses to the JFK Assassination

ONE ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY :

The theory says that a three-centimeter-long (1.2″) copper-jacketed lead-core 6.5×52mm Mannlicher–Carcano rifle bullet fired from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository passed through President Kennedy’s neck and went into Governor Connally’s chest, went through his wrist, and embedded itself in the Governor’s thigh. If so, this bullet traversed 15 layers of clothing, seven layers of skin, and approximately 15 inches of muscle tissue, struck a necktie knot, removed 4 inches of rib, and shattered a radius bone. The bullet was found on a gurney in the corridor at Parkland Memorial Hospital after the assassination. The Warren Commission found that this gurney was the one that had borne Governor Connally. This bullet became a key exhibit for the Commission. Its copper jacket was completely intact. While the bullet’s nose appeared normal, the tail was compressed laterally on one side.

ONE ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY :

How to knock down three buildings with two "airplanes?" (What were the odds?)

ONE ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF MATHEMATICAL IMPOSSIBILITY :

John Basilone says :
In1986 I was a 2nd Lt. and a newly minted, USAF officer and aviator, flying C-130s.  One of my first operational missions was to fly some troops to  Andrews AFB.   We stayed in D.C. for two days. On one day, we wemt to the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum.  When I saw the LEM and especially when I saw the lunar rover exhibit, a life size mock-up, I told one of my crewmates, another 2nd Lt., copilot, that this is b.s., no way they landed the LEM with that rover.  After seeing that exhibit, I started questioning the veracity of the lunar landings. Most professional aviators do not have the balls to even question the lunar missions, let alone say that they were fake.  Look at 911, any active aviator who questions 911 will be grounded. Few will say a thing when they know the Pentagon strike was a virtual impossibilty.

Now, all you have to do is to apply this same logic (mathematical impossibility) to "The 1986 Challenger crew still alive and kicking" case....

Ronald McNair is next. He was a Mission Specialist on the crew. The official story is that this picture below is of Carl McNair, who just happens to be Ronald’s twin brother. If you believe that, then I’ve got some land in Florida I think you might be interested in. Here you can see “Carl” McNair on LinkedIn, where he happens to be a “Best-Selling Author, Inspirational Speaker and Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Education Consultant.”

Hilarious nonsense.  If evil government wanted hide someone, they’d be given a completely new identity and moved somewhere no one know them.

The last thing they’d do is invent a non-existent identical brother.  Because countless friends, colleagues, family members, old classmates, etc would clearly remember him not having a brother. 

If you believe that, I’ve got a moon going cheap. 

Perfect example of conspiracy theorists believing any old crap they find on the internet that reinforces their ideas.  How about engaging that critical thinking you lot claim to have?

Quote from: cikljamas on May 30, 2020, 04:45:45 AM

Ronald McNair is next. He was a Mission Specialist on the crew. The official story is that this picture below is of Carl McNair, who just happens to be Ronald’s twin brother. If you believe that, then I’ve got some land in Florida I think you might be interested in. Here you can see “Carl” McNair on LinkedIn, where he happens to be a “Best-Selling Author, Inspirational Speaker and Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Education Consultant.”

Hilarious nonsense.  If evil government wanted hide someone, they’d be given a completely new identity and moved somewhere no one know them.

The last thing they’d do is invent a non-existent identical brother.  Because countless friends, colleagues, family members, old classmates, etc would clearly remember him not having a brother. 

If you believe that, I’ve got a moon going cheap. 

Perfect example of conspiracy theorists believing any old crap they find on the internet that reinforces their ideas.  How about engaging that critical thinking you lot claim to have?

they trust people's stupidity so much that they don't need to hide their identity.

Also, NASA is not NSA, it cannot do it on its own.

Quote from: cikljamas on May 30, 2020, 04:45:45 AM

Ronald McNair is next. He was a Mission Specialist on the crew. The official story is that this picture below is of Carl McNair, who just happens to be Ronald’s twin brother. If you believe that, then I’ve got some land in Florida I think you might be interested in. Here you can see “Carl” McNair on LinkedIn, where he happens to be a “Best-Selling Author, Inspirational Speaker and Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Education Consultant.”

Hilarious nonsense.  If evil government wanted hide someone, they’d be given a completely new identity and moved somewhere no one know them.

The last thing they’d do is invent a non-existent identical brother.  Because countless friends, colleagues, family members, old classmates, etc would clearly remember him not having a brother. 

If you believe that, I’ve got a moon going cheap. 

Perfect example of conspiracy theorists believing any old crap they find on the internet that reinforces their ideas.  How about engaging that critical thinking you lot claim to have?

Well, the fact is that they lost long ago any respect with respect to any kind of critical thinking of average "useless eater," so that they don't hesitate to use every occasion to insult our intelligence to the highest possible degree. They know that they can get away with literally anything (no matter how obvious their crime could be), so they simply enjoy laughing at us. The newest example of their brazen arrogance : I can't breathe - must see :

EIFFEL TOWER PROOF :

Now, all you have to do is to apply this same logic (mathematical impossibility) to "The 1986 Challenger crew still alive and kicking" case....

No, I don't have to apply a bunch of random "math" from other conspiracy theories.

All I have to know is how sad it is people are spreading lies about a bunch of brave people who died in a terrible accident.

Shameful.

Quote from: cikljamas on May 30, 2020, 06:18:48 AM

Now, all you have to do is to apply this same logic (mathematical impossibility) to "The 1986 Challenger crew still alive and kicking" case....

No, I don't have to apply a bunch of random "math" from other conspiracy theories.

All I have to know is how sad it is people are spreading lies about a bunch of brave people who died in a terrible accident.

Shameful.

If you were interested in seeing something really shameful, then you should watch at least first video from my APOLLO-HOAX OF THE CENTURY series of videos (few days ago reuploaded since youtube finally (quite recently) decided to shut down my primary youtube channel (after harassing me for years, simply because they couldn't stand the truth) :

IN ADDITION : The best demonstration (EVER) of mathematical impossibility :

Quote from: Unconvinced on May 30, 2020, 06:24:38 AM

Quote from: cikljamas on May 30, 2020, 04:45:45 AM

Ronald McNair is next. He was a Mission Specialist on the crew. The official story is that this picture below is of Carl McNair, who just happens to be Ronald’s twin brother. If you believe that, then I’ve got some land in Florida I think you might be interested in. Here you can see “Carl” McNair on LinkedIn, where he happens to be a “Best-Selling Author, Inspirational Speaker and Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Education Consultant.”

Hilarious nonsense.  If evil government wanted hide someone, they’d be given a completely new identity and moved somewhere no one know them.

The last thing they’d do is invent a non-existent identical brother.  Because countless friends, colleagues, family members, old classmates, etc would clearly remember him not having a brother. 

If you believe that, I’ve got a moon going cheap. 

Perfect example of conspiracy theorists believing any old crap they find on the internet that reinforces their ideas.  How about engaging that critical thinking you lot claim to have?

Well, the fact is that they lost long ago any respect with respect to any kind of critical thinking of average "useless eater," so that they don't hesitate to use every occasion to insult our intelligence to the highest possible degree. They know that they can get away with literally anything (no matter how obvious their crime could be), so they simply enjoy laughing at us.

What?   It’s the story you would have us believe that insults the intelligence.  Using the same actor to play the twin brother after killing off the original character is daytime soap opera level bollocks.

The official story is perfectly normal.  Some people have brothers.  Shocking.

Quote from: cikljamas on May 30, 2020, 06:39:15 AM

Quote from: Unconvinced on May 30, 2020, 06:24:38 AM

Quote from: cikljamas on May 30, 2020, 04:45:45 AM

Ronald McNair is next. He was a Mission Specialist on the crew. The official story is that this picture below is of Carl McNair, who just happens to be Ronald’s twin brother. If you believe that, then I’ve got some land in Florida I think you might be interested in. Here you can see “Carl” McNair on LinkedIn, where he happens to be a “Best-Selling Author, Inspirational Speaker and Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Education Consultant.”

Hilarious nonsense.  If evil government wanted hide someone, they’d be given a completely new identity and moved somewhere no one know them.

The last thing they’d do is invent a non-existent identical brother.  Because countless friends, colleagues, family members, old classmates, etc would clearly remember him not having a brother. 

If you believe that, I’ve got a moon going cheap. 

Perfect example of conspiracy theorists believing any old crap they find on the internet that reinforces their ideas.  How about engaging that critical thinking you lot claim to have?

Well, the fact is that they lost long ago any respect with respect to any kind of critical thinking of average "useless eater," so that they don't hesitate to use every occasion to insult our intelligence to the highest possible degree. They know that they can get away with literally anything (no matter how obvious their crime could be), so they simply enjoy laughing at us.

What?   It’s the story you would have us believe that insults the intelligence.  Using the same actor to play the twin brother after killing off the original character is daytime soap opera level bollocks.

The official story is perfectly normal.  Some people have brothers.  Shocking.

Well, some people have brothers, but finding 6 (out of 7 crew members on a ship) either identical twins or brothers & sisters that look like identical twins is beyond imagination...Let me show you one another example that belongs to that category (beyond imagination) :

Quote from: Unconvinced on May 30, 2020, 07:01:09 AM

Quote from: cikljamas on May 30, 2020, 06:39:15 AM

Quote from: Unconvinced on May 30, 2020, 06:24:38 AM

Quote from: cikljamas on May 30, 2020, 04:45:45 AM

Ronald McNair is next. He was a Mission Specialist on the crew. The official story is that this picture below is of Carl McNair, who just happens to be Ronald’s twin brother. If you believe that, then I’ve got some land in Florida I think you might be interested in. Here you can see “Carl” McNair on LinkedIn, where he happens to be a “Best-Selling Author, Inspirational Speaker and Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) Education Consultant.”

Hilarious nonsense.  If evil government wanted hide someone, they’d be given a completely new identity and moved somewhere no one know them.

The last thing they’d do is invent a non-existent identical brother.  Because countless friends, colleagues, family members, old classmates, etc would clearly remember him not having a brother. 

If you believe that, I’ve got a moon going cheap. 

Perfect example of conspiracy theorists believing any old crap they find on the internet that reinforces their ideas.  How about engaging that critical thinking you lot claim to have?

Well, the fact is that they lost long ago any respect with respect to any kind of critical thinking of average "useless eater," so that they don't hesitate to use every occasion to insult our intelligence to the highest possible degree. They know that they can get away with literally anything (no matter how obvious their crime could be), so they simply enjoy laughing at us.

What?   It’s the story you would have us believe that insults the intelligence.  Using the same actor to play the twin brother after killing off the original character is daytime soap opera level bollocks.

The official story is perfectly normal.  Some people have brothers.  Shocking.

Well, some people have brothers, but finding 6 (out of 7 crew members on a ship) either identical twins or brothers & sisters that look like identical twins is beyond imagination...Let me show you one another example that belongs to that category (beyond imagination) :

Alex Jones is not someone I would use as a source "beyond imagination". The guy's imagination is completely livid.

Well, some people have brothers, but finding 6 (out of 7 crew members on a ship) either identical twins or brothers & sisters that look like identical twins is beyond imagination...

So 6 out of 7 people have a brother or sister that looks like them to you is proof of a vast coverup? That's insane, and disgusting.

I hope you never have someone close to you die, and then have people spread lies and slander about them all over the internet. I hope you never have to see the face of a brother or parent or wife or child plastered all over videos and told that their death is all a lie, and you are also part of it.

I can't imagine how horrible that would be.

I can't imagine how horrible someone needs to be to spread such hate and lies. Sick.

Well, some people have brothers, but finding 6 (out of 7 crew members on a ship) either identical twins or brothers & sisters that look like identical twins is beyond imagination.

Make that 2 of the them.  The rest are just people with the same or similar names.

And different faces.

Take a look at the upper lip tic of the Resnik woman:



Now search for her on any people-finding website.

https://www.spokeo.com/Judith-Resnik

There are only five entries for people named Judith Resnik in Spokeo. It is a very rare name.

Judith C Resnik 1 in New Haven CT is the older Yale-professor Judith Resnik seen in the above image

Judith A Resnik 2 in Seabrook, TX are records of the dead NASA-Judith Arlene Resnik, who lived in Seabrook, TX at one point according to google searches

Entries 3 and 4 are named Judy Resnik

The last entry is Juith C. Pemberton who is Pemberton by Marriage.

The only person going by the name of Judith Resnik according to Spokeo in the United States happens to look just like the dead astronaut Judith Resnik, with the same facial deformity.

What a coincidence.

This played out argument is a repost and has already been explained.

This played out argument is a repost and has already been explained.

And the explanation was "it's a coincidence!"

My dad is friends with someone named John Davis.

Let go of the shovel.


https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/challenger-crew-alive/

Keep it clean and on topic, please.

Take a look at the upper lip tic of the Resnik woman:



Now search for her on any people-finding website.

https://www.spokeo.com/Judith-Resnik

There are only five entries for people named Judith Resnik in Spokeo. It is a very rare name.

Judith C Resnik 1 in New Haven CT is the older Yale-professor Judith Resnik seen in the above image

Judith A Resnik 2 in Seabrook, TX are records of the dead NASA-Judith Arlene Resnik, who lived in Seabrook, TX at one point according to google searches

Entries 3 and 4 are named Judy Resnik

The last entry is Juith C. Pemberton who is Pemberton by Marriage.

The only person going by the name of Judith Resnik according to Spokeo in the United States happens to look just like the dead astronaut Judith Resnik, with the same facial deformity.

What a coincidence.

Facial deformity? A freeze frame where she is speaking similar sounds to another picture so they have the same lip position is a deformity now? Why am I not surprised to fell for this conspiracy theory too, Tom. It's both absurd and far-fetched, two things you seem to love.

It's also deeply insulting to the dead, and in that I'm disappointed in you. How would you feel if a loved one died and was treated like this on the internet? Try a a little empathy here, spreading these lies hurts people, just try and imagine how their families feel. They lost loved ones and now have to deal with crazies on the internet attacking them. It's heartless and cruel.

Please refer to the Round Earth Wiki:



"Nobody familiar with either person would confuse these two Judith Resniks with each other, as they have very different facial structures. And while Judith Resnik the electrical engineer was engaged in work and study at RCA, NIH, Xerox, and NASA in the 1970s and 80s, Judith Resnik the lawyer was teaching law school classes at Yale and USC. How someone could have been simultaneously (not to mention secretly) holding down two completely disparate jobs at opposite ends of the country remains unexplained."

That's not too compelling. They generally look the same, have a similar lip tic, and have the same name, which is a rare name which few in the country have. It is one coincidence piled upon another.

And the rebuttal to this is what the older Resnik was claiming to do in the 80's? That she didn't write "dead astronaut" on her resume or something?

Take a look at the upper lip tic of the Resnik woman:



Now search for her on any people-finding website.

https://www.spokeo.com/Judith-Resnik

There are only five entries for people named Judith Resnik in Spokeo. It is a very rare name.

Judith C Resnik 1 in New Haven CT is the older Yale-professor Judith Resnik seen in the above image

Judith A Resnik 2 in Seabrook, TX are records of the dead NASA-Judith Arlene Resnik, who lived in Seabrook, TX at one point according to google searches

Entries 3 and 4 are named Judy Resnik

The last entry is Juith C. Pemberton who is Pemberton by Marriage.

The only person going by the name of Judith Resnik according to Spokeo in the United States happens to look just like the dead astronaut Judith Resnik, with the same facial deformity.

What a coincidence.

This:


Does not look like this:


Judith Resnik the astronaut is dead. Judith Resnik the Yale professor is not. She appears to have published a bunch of papers. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/JResnik_Publications.pdf (warning, direct link to PDF file)

Apparently in 1982 she worked on: Should Prisoners Be Classified by Sex?, in Criminal Corrections: Ideals and Realities, at
109-123 (ed. J. Doig, Mass: Lexington Books, Fall, 1982).

I don't think somebody that is going to fly a space shuttle in 4 years after that will be working on completely different subject. There's also a list of articles she worked on around 1986, they all don't sound very space-like:

Judging Consent, University of Chicago Legal Forum 43 (1987).
Images of Justice (with Dennis E. Curtis), 96 Yale Law Journal 1727 (1987).
The Problems of Parity, Journal of the National Prison Project (Fall 1987).
Failing Faith: Adjudicatory Procedure in Decline, 53 University of Chicago Law Review
494 (1986); also published by RAND, Institute for Civil Justice (1986).
The Declining Faith in the Adversary System, 13 Litigation 3 (1986).
The Mythic Meaning of Article III Courts, 56 University of Colorado Law
Review 581 (1985).
Precluding Appeals, 70 Cornell Law Review 603 (1985).

According to her bio she moved to live with her husband while he was studying law. Not much of a stretch that she would go into law afterwards if NASA wanted her to move and change careers. In the 80's they didn't have the internet like we do now and may not have forseen that this was not good enough.

Again, listing what the older Resnik claimed to do in the 80's is hardly good enough. You are claiming that she didn't write that she was a dead astronaut and listed some things about what she was doing so therefore she isn't her.

And again, ignoring the phenomenal coincidences of a doppelganger with the same facial tick and super rare name.

According to her bio she moved to live with her husband while he was studying law. Not much of a stretch that she would go into law afterwards if NASA wanted her to move and change careers. In the 80's they didn't have the internet like we do now and may not have forseen that this was not good enough.

Again, listing what the older Resnik claimed to do in the 80's is hardly good enough. You are claiming that she didn't write that she was a dead astronaut and made some thing up about what she was doing so therefore she isn't.

The list of articles are all on the website of Yale. And she did law stuff before 1986.

That's not too compelling. They generally look the same, have a similar lip tic, and have the same name, which is a rare name which few in the country have. It is one coincidence piled upon another.

And the rebuttal to this is what the older Resnik was claiming to do in the 80's? That she didn't write "dead astronaut" on her resume or something?

The rebuttal to this absurd conspiracy theory is that the living Resnik had a busy career in the 80's, so if she was the same as the dead one, how did they both live totally separate lives at the same time?

Your entire argument is they kind of look similar.

It's still a disgusting conspiracy theory to push and you should be ashamed. You have no respect for other human beings.

YOU ONLY NEED TO PROVE ONE OF THEM TO BE THE SAME PERSON TO PROVE THE THEORY

Then pick one, and prove it.
The fact that you want to spam all of them indicates you likely can't prove any and that you are trying to just make a bunch of baseless claims to bury your opponents in BS.
Especially as all these claims have been refuted before, by plenty of people.
e.g.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/challenger-crew-alive/

It seems you have picked Francis Scobee.


As you can see from the snopes article, the 2 are different people.

What evidence do you have that they are the same?
That they superficially look similar?
Not convincing enough.

More importantly, don't you think if NASA was going to do something like this they would give them completely different names, and likely also given them plastic surgery to change what they look like?

Your argument relies upon extreme stupidity by an organisation allegedly so advanced and intelligent they have been duping for thousands of years.
No sane person would buy that if they actually took the time to think about it.

They generally look the same

How?
They are both female?
The same colour hair.
That isn't too surprising.

I see no significant similarities that I would use to recognise an individual.
If you presented the 2 pictures of the people as just random people I would not recognise them as the same person.

All you have is a picture of someone with the same name (which you have proven is not difficult as multiple people have that name).


The standard of evidence used to confirm these are the same people is so low it isn't funny,
You literally just have a superficially similar apparence based upon attributes shared by so many people it isn't funny.
Some times you have the same name, which is a bonus, but again, based upon the attributes and how names typically work, that isn't anything special.

The closest you have is the brother, and that isn't anything special, considering brothers typically look alike, especially when you are comparing photos of them taken decades apart.

This is not enough evidence to convince any sane person.

Why should anyone believe these are the same people?

Quote from: cikljamas on May 30, 2020, 04:45:45 AM

YOU ONLY NEED TO PROVE ONE OF THEM TO BE THE SAME PERSON TO PROVE THE THEORY

Then pick one, and prove it.

Just one? How about two?

These are 5 years old informations, but it really doesn't matter (since you gonna like it), does it :





CARL MCNAIR
I searched on Ancestry.com for a “Carl McNair,” who claims to be the brother of astronaut Ronald McNair. Carl S. McNair’s LinkedIn page says his birthdate is Dec. 16; Wikipedia’s page on Ronald McNair says his parents are Carl C. and Pearl M. McNair. So I asked Ancestry.com to search all “birth, baptism and christening” records for “Carl McNair,” born on Dec. 16, whose father is Carl McNair and mother is Pearl McNair.

Result of search: Just one record in Texas Birth Certificates 1903-1932, that of Herschel John McNair, born on 12 Oct 1912 – Rosewood, Upshur, whose father was William McNair and mother was Pearl Watkins.

In other words, according to Ancestry.com, there is no Carl McNair, brother of Ronald McNair. Here’s the screenshot I took of ancestry.com’s search results, with the time (10:18 AM) and date (5/9/2015) when I took it in the lower right corner (circled in red).

Just to be sure, I re-did my search for “Carl McNair,” this time without specifying the names of the parents. There were 8,850 results. So I narrowed the search to �Carl McNair,� whose father�s last name is McNair and whose mother�s first name is Pearl. That narrowed the results to 8,980, which include all persons whose last name is McNair or similar-sounding last names, e.g., McNare, McNear, Mackner. Of those 8,980 results, I found no Carl McNair whose father�s name is (also) Carl McNair and whose mother�s first name is Pearl.

No parent names were given for these 3 Carl McNairs:

Carl W. McNair, b. Sept 2, 1950
Carl F. McNair, b. Feb. 9, 1954
Marcus Carl McNair, b. Dec. 23, 1952
Since astronaut Ronald McNair was born on Oct. 21, 1950, we can rule out #1 Carl W. McNair, born on Sept. 2, 1950, as Ronald’s brother. That leaves us with Carl. F. McNair and Marcus Carl McNair.




CLAUDE ONIZUKA
I also asked Ancestry.com to search for the birth records of �Claude Onizuka,� the alleged brother of astronaut Ellison Onizuka. According to Wikipedia�s entry on Ellison Onizuka, his father was the late Masamitsu Onizuka, his mother is Mitsue Onizuka.

Result of search: �Your search for Claude Onizuka returned zero good matches.�

Just to be sure, I re-did the search for �Claude Onizuka,� this time without putting in the names of the parents. There were 36 results, none of which is Claude Onizuka. In other words, according to Ancestry.com, no one named Claude Onizuka had ever been born in the United States.





In the end we need to ask ourselves this question:

It’s one thing that one of the Challenger’s crew members resembles someone alive today. For that, we can chalk it up to a coincidence.

It’s another thing entirely that SIX members of the Challenger crew have doppelgangers who are alive, in some cases with exactly the same names (Richard Scobee, Michael J. Smith, Judith Resnick, Sharon McAuliffe). What are the chances of that?

You don’t have to be an expert in mathematics to know that those odds defy statistical probability.

Your definition of evidence seems to be different From everyone else’s.

( Massive cut and paste deleted )

Quit attacking family members of the dead and innocent people by spreading your lies. None of that copy paste of conspiracy garbage is true. I frankly don't understand how you can be so cold hearted and cruel to people who lost loved ones like that. And all those innocent people who have to deal with internet crazies stalking them online because people like YOU keep posting their names and pictures and spreading hate and lies.

I mean, my gosh, a white woman looks like another white woman and look here are two african americans. That's your proof? People kind of look alike? It's sick. You have no empathy. A functioning human being wouldn't spread crap like that.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/challenger-crew-alive/

Just one? How about two?

You don't have two. You don't even have 1.
Now like I said, pick one and stick to it.

If you are going to spam a bunch of them because you aren't capable of defending one and instead need to jump between them, it shows you have none.

So take your pick, choose ONE and defend that 1, or I will take it you have none.

What will it be?