@themightykabool
That's funny.
Sandokhan's whole point is that RE'rs (honestly, most all people) do not know the physics, as evidenced by his unanswerable "trick question" - which few in this thread have recognized as such...
Not really. Most REers aren't on this forum, because they don't really give a damn if a bunch of fools believe Earth is flat.
The bigger issue with Sandokhan is his play of semantics over exactly what constitutes a mechanism.
The mechanism by which the water adheres to the surface is gravity.
But like everything, that can be pushed back to ask for the mechanism of gravity, then the mechanism of that and so on.
e.g. someone provides mass curves spacetime which results in objects following geodesics which convert motion through time into motion through space; then he asks for the mechanism by which mass curves spacetime and the mechanism by which curved spacetime accelerates objects.
But it doesn't matter what you pick, this will always be the case with you always being able to push things an extra step back.
Sandy refuses to accept that and wants to pretend you can have a perfect mechanism with no extra questions, so he can pretend that gravity simply being like all fundamental forces is a problem for the RE.