The Ellis ether wormhole is a fact of science: the only rotating wormhole which is stable.

Ether vortex model, published in the Journal of Mathematical Physics.

Dr. Ellis' groundbreaking paper takes GTR from a singularity to a drainhole aether model, the paper was published in the JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS.

Now, the mathematical theory for the absorption/emission of aether through a Planck length level particle.

http://euclid.colorado.edu/~ellis/RelativityPapers/EtFlThDrPaMoGeRe.pdfEther flow through a drainhole: a particle model in general relativity

Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 14, no. 1, 1973

Dr. Ellis:

This ether is in general "more than a mere inert medium for the propagation of electromagnetic waves; it is a restless, flowing continuum whose internal, relative motions manifest themselves to us as gravity.

**Mass particles appear as sources or sinks of this flowing ether.**"

Dr. Ellis:

The inertial mass of the particle modeled by the drainhole. A "Higgsian" way of expressing this idea is to say that the drainhole 'acquires' (inertial) mass from the scalar field.

The Ellis wormhole was rediscovered by Morris and Thorne later in time.

That is why this reference does not include the word "aether" in it; everybody knows what the model of the Ellis-Morris-Thorne ether wormhole stands for.

Now, I have the reference to back up this part of the aether mechanism.

These wormholes have throats on the order of the Planck length:

https://cds.cern.ch/record/350843/files/9803098.pdf (page 12)

Now, imagine the level of ignorance of this statement:

*Sure it says that "These wormholes have throats with radii of order of the Planck length, and could*

serve as a model for space-time foam".

But you have no justification to claim "this part of the aether mechanism". The paper says no such thing!The Ellis-Morris-Thorne wormhole IS an aether wormhole.

Rotating Ellis wormholes create weight.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1503.pdfRotating Ellis Wormholes in Four Dimensions

**The rotating wormholes attain a finite mass and quadrupole moment.**

Gravity is described by quantum entanglement Ellis wormholes.These wormhole must rotate and must be traversable.

This is how an object attains weight.

*Not only that but g varies from place to place on the Earth's surface and in space is totally meaningless.*

This makes your "mass = density x volume; density = specific weight/g" totally useless.Here is the

**W = -mg** formula at the SUBQUARK/GRAVITON level:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13386630_Gravity_as_a_zero-point-fluctuation_force [equation (62)]

(where, of course, g = Gm/r

^{2})

Thus, WEIGHT is the fundamental force which manifests itself at the quantum level.

Then, we have the weight of a subquark/parton/graviton formula derived by three of the top physicists in the world:

(m = W/g)

https://web.archive.org/web/20190228190940/https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9069/0be66e03f535dd3b47aeb76ea36bfc3d1909.pdfIt was published in the Physical Review A:

https://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.49.678I have everything here, the formulas, the papers.