I'm far from struggling. I'm more than happy to explain to people who genuinely want to understand.
Really?
Because I am yet to see you explain anything.
You only seem to be willing to preach to those who are willing to accept whatever BS you say without thinking or quesitoning.
You do not fit into this category.
And more pathetic insults.
I have shown that I do fit into the category that you have actually described, those with a genuine interest in understanding.
I have done this by actually listening to your model, and asking for how it explains various things, and keeping those things in mind with later things which causes a conflict because you contradict yourself.
If you have a model which works to describe reality, I want to know and understand it.
But that doesn't mean I will just accept whatever nonsense you say.
The only reason you say I don't want to understand is because you cannot address the issues raised because your model simply doesn't work.
The category I don't fit into is the one you actually want, that described above, the fools who will just accept whatever you say.
I don't fit into that category because I actually care about the truth, unlike you.
So if you really are more than happy to explain and you aren't struggling at all, then answer one of the most basic issues of your model:
What makes air stack such that the pressure is greater the lower down in the stack you are?
Remember, it can't be the air. That is what you are trying to explain; and if we ignore what happens at the top, then if it was just each layer of air pushing down on the next, the pressure would be constant.
You need a force acting on each layer of air to cause the pressure to increase.
What is the source of this force?
Can you actually explain it? Or can you just insult and dismiss those who question your model?
It makes no sense to you and others because you will not allow it to
No, it makes absolutely no sense because it directly contradicts itself as repeatedly explained.
You have no justification for why your air stacks.
This issue has been clearly shown to you repeatedly, and you just ignore it.
And that is just one of many issues.
We have raised numerous issues where your model contradicts reality or itself, and you have no answer and instead just ignore the issue entirely or find some way to deflect, or just insult us.
Once more, the issue is not us, it is you and your model.
because to make sense of it would be to kill off your globe and we can't be having that, can we?
See, this is also pure BS, and that has also been explained to you.
There is nothing in your nonsense which prevents it from working just as well on a globe.
You would have the RE as the foundation, with the air stacking by pure magic, just in spherical shells instead of flat layers, all the way out to the dome, which would be another spherical shell.
As you have provided no justification for what magic causes the air to stack, there is nothing stopping working just as well on the globe we live on.
So that clearly is not the reason.
The most likely reason so many people think it is nonsense is because it is nonsense, and you just refuse to admit it.
If it wasn't nonsense, you would have addressed the multitude of issues raised instead of ignoring them entirely or deflecting however you can.