In fact, there is.
Again, explain just what you think it is.
So far you have just repeatedly asserted that there is some paradox without justifying that there is any.
Again, what do you think the paradox is?
What observations are made, and how does that contradict with what should be happening?
A model being imperfect is not a paradox. A paradox is where 2 contradictory statements need to be true at the same time, like the sun being above Earth and below Earth at the same time, or a statement which contradicts itself like "this statement is false".
So far what we actually have is an observation which is being modelled to various extents, but with some limitations of those models.
You then latch on to them and pretend that means there is some massive problem.
It is really no better than saying the weather saying it will rain while it didn't rain is a massive paradox which refutes the RE.
So there is no paradox.
All of the authors mentioned by you present the Chapman-Lindzen model.
Which has been debunked.
Where?
Showing a model is incomplete is not debunking it.
Here is the absolute proof that the atmospheric tide is caused by the atmospheric electrical tide (both semidiurnal):
You might want to learn what absolute proof is.
That article does not contain it.
If you think it does, why don't you provide exactly where?
Especially note that correlation (especially such an imperfect one) does not indicate causation.
Have you considered if the atmospheric tide CAUSES the electrical tide?
Or if they both have a common cause?
In fact, if you bother reading what they say, you will see they suggest exactly that:
"change of barometric pressure may influence potential gradient, by modifying the rate at which this ionized air escapes into the atmosphere"
But they also show it really isn't likely to be the case that either of these cause the other. That is because while the amplitude of the variation of one increased, it decreased for the other.
If they were in fact causing each other, you would expect them to follow the same trend.
So what that really shows is that there is some common causal element causing them both.