Let me put an end to this right now.
M. avium has been isolated in covid-19 patients.
https://www.academia.edu/43416919/How_BCG_Vaccination_Trials_Might_Finally_Unlock_the_Many_Mysteries_of_COVID_19_ (pg 9-12)





The current situation is this: delta, lambda, epsilon, eta, mu and C.1.2 are completely resistant to the cmRNA / adenovirus vaccines.
A third shot, specific for any of the variants, will unleash the antigenic sin phenomenon (i.e., it is useless).
A third shot, for the Wuhan original strain (which, incidentally, disappeared from view in march 2020), won't be of any help: the antibodies last at most six weeks. And those antibodies have nothing to do with sars-cov-2.
The vaccines are cmRNA, and not mRNA. cmRNA = chemically modified RNA.
Definition of cmRNA:
"cmRNA is mRNA that has been modified through the substitution of chemically modified bases for normal bases, such as pseudouridine for uridine."
The vaccines are coded with PSEUDOURIDINE (pseudouracil), an isomer of URIDINE. Different chirality, different chemical/biological functions, different configuration. A total disaster. All of the resultant proteins will be mutant.
The vaccines do not have a stop codon. Believe it or not. All of the resultant proteins will be mutant.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/734/htmHowever, superficial application of these two criteria can lead to mistakes. I will take the CGN codon family for Arg to show an incorrect optimization of the two mRNA vaccines.
The designers of both vaccines considered CGG as the optimal codon in the CGN codon family and recoded almost all CGN codons to CGG. There are two lines of evidence suggesting that CGG is not the optimal codon. These multiple lines of evidence suggest that CGC is a better codon than CGG. The designers of the mRNA vaccines (especially mRNA-1273, Table 1) chose a wrong codon as the optimal codon.
Pfizer/BioNTech’s BNT162b2 mRNA features two consecutive UGA stop codons. Moderna’s mRNA-1273 uses all three different stop codons UGAUAAUAG. Are these the optimal arrangement?
With such a +1 frameshifting, a downstream in-frame stop codon cannot serve as a fail-safe mechanism. UGA is a poor choice of a stop codon, and UGAU in Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines could be even worse.
One caveat in the reasoning above involves the replacement of U by N1-methylpseudouridine (Ψ) in the two vaccine mRNAs.
Therefore, the stop signals are ΨGAΨGA instead of UGAUGA in Pfizer/BioNTech’s vaccine, and ΨGAΨAAΨAG instead of UGAUAAUAG in Moderna’s vaccine. As Ψ is more promiscuous in base-pairing than U and can pair with both A and G and, to a less extent, with C and U, stop codons become more prone to misreading by tRNAs. It is for this reason that both mRNA vaccines use consecutive stop codons as a fail-safe mechanism, with the hope that no frameshifting occurs when the first stop codon fails. However, UGAU is known to cause a +1 frameshifting. It is reasonable to infer that ΨGAΨ may be the same. I have mentioned before that mammalian AZ1 gene with a stop codon context UGAU is prone to polyamine-induced +1 frameshifting. Such a +1 frameshifting defeats the purpose of having multiple stop codons as a fail-safe mechanism.
We find ourselves in the Spartan Virus scenario: only an exobiological solution will be offered. Now, remember that I have been writing about ICHOR for years here now. Ichor, the blood of the titans, is extremely toxic to humans.
The Sars-cov-2 genom (MN908947) has protein codes which belong to a cobra.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jmv.25682"The researchers used an analysis of the protein codes favored by the new cor.onavirus and compared it to the protein codes from cor.onaviruses found in different animal hosts, like birds, snakes, marmots, hedgehogs, manis, bats and humans. Surprisingly, they found that the protein codes in the 2019-nCoV are most similar to those used in snakes."
There are huge doubts about the RaTG13 bat genom sequence:
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202008.0205/v3https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202008.0595/v1ACE2 proteins from snakes can bind to the RBD of the spike protein:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7221370/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339320636_Structure_analysis_of_the_receptor_binding_of_2019-nCoV"However,the possibility that cold-blooded animals like snakes can serve as a host cannot be ruled out. The flexible interacting loop identified in our study may allow the virus to adapt to both the cold-blooded and warm-blooded hosts."
"BNT162b is a mRNA vac.cine for prevention of COVID-19. The vac.cine is made of a mRNA encoding forthe full-length SAR.S-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (S) encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The sequence of the S protein was chosen based on the sequence for the “SAR.S-CoV-2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1”, which was available when the program was initiated: GenBank: MN908947.3 (complete genome) and GenBank: QHD43416.1 (spike surface glycoprotein)."
"To generate the template for RNA synthesis, a DNA fragment encoding the SAR.S-CoV-2 P2280 S protein (based on GenBank: MN908947), including the amino acid exchanges K986P and 281 V987P, was cloned into a starting plasmid vector."
1913 Nobel Lecture, Charles Richet: theory of anaphylactic shock. Once a foreign protein (antigen) is introduced directly in the blood, the pacient becomes anaphylactized. That is, a second minute dose of the same antigen will unleash the anaphylactic shock.
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1913/richet/lecture/"We are so constituted that we can never receive other
proteins into the blood than those that have been modified
by digestive juices. Every time alien protein penetrates
by effraction, the organism suffers and becomes resistant.
This resistance lies in increased sensitivity, a sort of
revolt against the second parenteral injection which would
be fatal. At the first injection, the organism was taken
by surprise and did not resist. At the second injection,
the organism mans its defences and answers by the
anaphylactic shock."

mRNA for spike proteins belonging to sars-cov-2 has AGCU as a genetic code. cmRNA for spike protein being produced/created in the body has AGCΨ as a genetic code. A totally different chirality, biological/chemical functions.
The spike proteins from the vaccines are MORE pathogenic than the spike proteins from sars-cov-2:
https://www.francesoir.fr/opinions-tribunes/le-sars-cov2-accelererait-lage-biologique