No, I do not, I'm fact, believe you. I don't because I have no reason to after you committed so many ridiculous errors that you never acknowledge. And now you are trying to change the subject. This has really been a train wreck.
Alright, I'll do it for you. If the trial used a perfect vaccine, you would have 162/20000 people in the control getting sick and 0/20000 getting sick in the test group. If you naively try to calculate the "ARR" based on that, you get that it is actually 162/20000=0.81%. This, according to you, is useless. A fucking perfect vaccine that provides perfect immunity to everyone is, according to your analysis, useless.
Except as I explained a million times already, framing it like that is incredibly misleading, because the way vaccine trials work is, they give a bunch of people the real deal, then they give a placebo to another group, and they just leave them alone for a while. After the trial ends, a number of the people out of either group will have been exposed to the virus, ans some will have gotten sick. If you have a good vaccine, then the number in the test group will be much lower compared to the control group. However, most people won't get covid within that timeframe. It's just how it is. This will drive the ARR calculated that way wayyyyy down. But this is not representative of anything really, because the total absolute risk is not 0.81%, but much, much higher as evidenced by the millions and millions of people getting sick and dying.
There is nothing more to this conversation. You've made error after error. This is not subjective. Own up to it and move on. Jeez.
Also tell me what your book is called, I want to find it.