The faster we vax the less likely more mutations will arise.You have no idea what you are talking about.
The new strain D614G appeared exactly in March 2020, exactly after the first trial vaccines were administered.
The first powerful new strains then emerged exactly in the countries which used the trial vaccines the most: UK, SA, Brazil.
So, the faster you vax, the more mutations there will be. If a new third shot will be administered, there will be even further mutations/strains (more powerful than what the world is dealing with right now). Furthermore, reassortment viruses will appear.
Listen to the experts: the vaccination program started the mutations. Had M. avium been left alone, covid-19 would have been over by spring 2020.
According to concerns raised by a senior scientist at Oxford University, the global rollout of COVID-19 vaccines may lead to mutations in the virus caused by immunological selection.
Based on the observations made on COVID-19 virus mutations, Professor Sir John Bell has informed that the virus is mutating in order to be more effective in its new hosts, that is humans.
“Most of the variants we have seen so far represent that kind of adaptation to a new species; it’s a bit like moving into a new apartment, you are shuffling the sofa around and making sure the TV is in the right place,” Bell told colleagues and lawmakers.
“What we will see between now and the end of the year is a number of variants which are driven by immunological selection, largely by the vaccines, and that will add another layer of complexity.”
Bell also added that people are getting reinfected by the Brazilian and South African strains as these strains are resistant to the immunity that we have developed against previous COVID-19 virus strains.
The Financial Times warns the Brazil-variant of the virus has been found to evade natural immunity.
The P. 1 Covid-19 variant that originated in Brazil and has spread to more than 25 countries is around twice as transmissible as some other strains and is more likely to evade the natural immunity people usually develop from prior infection, according to a new international study.
It was also “able to evade 25-61 per cent of protective immunity elicited by previous infection” with any earlier variant, the researchers found, in a sign that current vaccines could also be less effective against it.
Let us now compare what Professor Bell is saying.
On one hand:
Professor Sir John Bell has informed that the virus is mutating in order to be more effective in its new hosts, that is humans.
“What we will see between now and the end of the year is a number of variants which are driven by immunological selection, largely by the vaccines, and that will add another layer of complexity.”
Then, if the virus is mutating and adding new layers of complexity it would make more sense to stop the entire vaccination program, right?
On the other hand:
It does appear that the existing vaccines are able to prevent severe disease.
'We need to be conscious of the new variants, we need to be ready to make new vaccines if we need them, but I am pretty clear our existing vaccines are going to work to some extent,' he said."
How are the vaccines going to work if they are behind the emergence of the new strains? If new layers of complexity are added by the vaccines themselves, most definitely the vaccines will no longer be able to offer any protection whatsoever. NEW vaccines are going to be needed for the new strains. But these NEW vaccines will also add more layers of complexities, that is, they will become useless almost immediately.
Viruses tend to become less pathogenic. If this is not happening to SARS-Cov-2 then something else very ominous is going on. Even the 1918-1919 Spanish flu was over after the pandemic took its toll for a single year. What is going on does not make any sense, unless we are dealing with leaky vaccines, which allow the mycobacteria (and the passenger viruses) to thrive and to become more pathogenic.
Vaccinations do cause strains.
https://www.francesoir.fr/opinions-tribunes/covid-19-questions-sur-les-vaccinsMais patatras, voilà que l’Académie de médecine s’y met, et maladroitement, car son explication pour ne pas différer la seconde injection, remet dans le circuit le risque de mutations dues aux vaccins. Outre le fait que « le retard peut faire en sorte que des anticorps facilitants créés pourrait exacerber la Covid-19 », le communiqué indique aussi que « le faible niveau d’immunité (après la primo-vaccination) constituera un terrain favorable pour sélectionner l’émergence d’un ou de plusieurs variants échappant à l’immunité induite par la vaccination ». Cela a été répété par Yves Buisson rapporteur, sur France Info.
Seconde question : y a-t-il un lien entre vaccins et derniers mutants ? Le communiqué de l’Académie de médecine dit que c’est possible, et des faits me troublent.
https://www.francetvinfo.fr/sante/maladie/coronavirus/vaccin/vaccins-contre-le-covid-19-en-espacant-les-deux-doses-de-vaccin-on-risque-d-avoir-des-mutations-du-virus-alerte-un-professeur-de-medecine_4255067.htmlBy spacing the two doses of vaccine, "we risk having mutations" of the virus, alerted Tuesday, January 12 on franceinfo, Professor Yves Buisson of the National Academy of Medicine, president of the Covid-19 cell .
In addition to the fact that "the delay may ensure that facilitating antibodies created could exacerbate Covid-19", the press release also indicates that "the low level of immunity (after the primary vaccination) will constitute a favorable ground for selecting the 'emergence of one or more variants escaping immunity induced by vaccination'.
Second question: is there a link between vaccines and the latest mutants? The press release from the Academy of Medicine says it is possible, and I am troubled by the facts.
Now listen to this.
"New Jersey-based Merck, one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies, has just abandoned its two experimental COVID vaccine projects after early data showed they generated little, if any, immune response in patients."
"After evaluating the data, Merck's leadership team decided to scrap the vax effort and focus resources on COVID treatments instead."
Why would they be focusing on treatments when the vaccine will make them unnecessary?