Really? you thinnk that would be a gravitational issue? I would say electro magnetic.
There are many possibilities. But the important part is that it in no way supports a FE as the difference between RE and FE is so minor.
Jack, I've seen the flatness, I believe. Did you ever think it was flat?
How have you seen the flatness? I have seen literally nothing of Earth that indicates it is flat.
At the small scale it is far too irregular to appear as Earth being flat.
At the large scale, there is only the appearance of it being round, such as being able to see at variable distance depending on height, and seeing objects over the horizon.
Just how have you "seen the flatness"?
Maybe your disbelieving brain blocks it out or you just see whatever you believe.
Again the double standard.
Have you thought of applying that to yourself?
Have you thought that you are happy to just appeal to ignorance
I don't kow man, this was just some casual talk generally about flat earth stuff, not meant to convince a disbeliever.Is it your mandate that you won't allow a flat earth statement to go unchecked here on the FES web site? Pls answwer this specific question.
The problem is you started to make claims about reality, while leaving it quite vague. That appears to be what a lot of FEers latch onto to try and say Earth can't be round.
They reference some vague experiment or observation with no details, which may or may not show Earth is flat or round, and act like it means Earth is flat.
If you want to have a discussion without making vague claims about reality, that is fine and I wont interrupt. (For example, you could talk about Johnson, without bringing up claims about his experiments which allegedly show Earth to be flat, and that would be fine.)
Alternatively, if you want to have a discussion where people like me can't interrupt, there is a "believers only" section to talk in, where REers like me aren't allowed.