I did not mean to spook or scare you my dear globularists. But it is useful to understand the connection scientists (GLOBULARIST SCIENTISTS mind you) can draw between the evils of Lucifer, Luciferase, and the danger of moonlight.
You mean no connection at all?
There are evils of lucifer. Lucifer refers to 2 separate fictional characters.
Its literal meaning is light bringing. It was the name given to the morning star before the evil Christians tried to sully it by linking it to Satan which they pretend is evil while worshipping a far more evil being.
The only real connection is that scientists seem to like using Latin for lots of things, and lucifer or light bringing is Latin. And what would be a better Latin name for something bringing forth light?
Now how about you cut the religious BS and instead deal with the massive failings of your wild speculation?
You claim it mirrors the patterns of bioluminescent creatures on Earth. Again, what creatures on Earth have a bioluminescent cycle that lasts for approximately 28 days, and then every 6 months, instead of being fully bright, they will some times dim, in a complex pattern?
In this case it occurs and gives off a water byproduct. The mechanism is there, the bioluminescence is observable
No, it isn't.
We know the mechanism on Earth, where there are the reactants for the chemical reaction. You have nothing more than wild speculation.
No bioluminescence is observable.
Instead we see the moon brightly illuminated, lit up by another object.
With bioluminescence we observe relatively sharp peaks in the emission spectra, based upon the enzyme and conditions.
For the moon, we see much closer to a black body radiation source.
This all points to the moon being illuminated by another bright object and it merely reflecting light.
Unlike your wild speculation, that actually wraps everything up in a nice little bow.
That's not really a justifiable claim now is it. I don't accept that astronauts have visited the moon.
You not liking the evidence/reality and wanting to reject it doesn't magically make the claim unjustifiable.
Do you know what is an unjustifiable claim? That the moon is lit up by bioluminescent organisms.
But even if they did- how would their short walks eliminate any possibility of life being present? Remember we're talking microflora.
Remember, you are talking about creatures which allegedly produce water from their bioluminescence.
The Astronauts went to an illuminated section of the moon, one which would be producing light and thus water if your wild speculation was true.
They didn't find water there.
Instead they notice the moon being illuminated by the sun, even having shadows cast.
They even brought back samples of the "dirt" from the moon.
So how about you try justifying your own claim?